What is the most durable construct for a forefoot amputation, traditional transmetatarsal amputation or a medial ray sparing procedure?

Lawrence A. Lavery, Peter A. Crisologo, Metin Yavuz

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial

Original language	English
Article number	S47
Journal	Journal of Threatened Taxa
Volume	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.02.46
State	Published - 1 Mar 2019

Access to Document

10.21037/atm.2019.02.46

Link to publication in Scopus

Cite this

Lavery, L. A., Crisologo, P. A., & Yavuz, M. (2019). What is the most durable construct for a forefoot amputation, traditional transmetatarsal amputation or a medial ray sparing procedure? Journal of Threatened Taxa, 7, [S47]. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.02.46

@article{5d79d8555d334bef8de83032998c7c99,

title = "What is the most durable construct for a forefoot amputation, traditional transmetatarsal amputation or a medial ray sparing procedure?",

author = "Lavery, {Lawrence A.} and Crisologo, {Peter A.} and Metin Yavuz",

year = "2019",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.21037/atm.2019.02.46",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

journal = "Journal of Threatened Taxa",

issn = "0974-7893",

publisher = "Wildlife Information & Liaison Development Society",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the most durable construct for a forefoot amputation, traditional transmetatarsal amputation or a medial ray sparing procedure?

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

AU - Crisologo, Peter A.

AU - Yavuz, Metin

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063738776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21037/atm.2019.02.46

DO - 10.21037/atm.2019.02.46

M3 - Editorial

VL - 7

JO - Journal of Threatened Taxa

JF - Journal of Threatened Taxa

SN - 0974-7893

M1 - S47

ER -