What is the most durable construct for a forefoot amputation, traditional transmetatarsal amputation or a medial ray sparing procedure?

Lawrence A. Lavery, Peter A. Crisologo, Metin Yavuz

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Original languageEnglish
Article numberS47
JournalJournal of Threatened Taxa
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

amputation

Cite this

@article{5d79d8555d334bef8de83032998c7c99,
title = "What is the most durable construct for a forefoot amputation, traditional transmetatarsal amputation or a medial ray sparing procedure?",
author = "Lavery, {Lawrence A.} and Crisologo, {Peter A.} and Metin Yavuz",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.21037/atm.2019.02.46",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Journal of Threatened Taxa",
issn = "0974-7893",
publisher = "Wildlife Information & Liaison Development Society",

}

What is the most durable construct for a forefoot amputation, traditional transmetatarsal amputation or a medial ray sparing procedure? / Lavery, Lawrence A.; Crisologo, Peter A.; Yavuz, Metin.

In: Journal of Threatened Taxa, Vol. 7, S47, 01.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the most durable construct for a forefoot amputation, traditional transmetatarsal amputation or a medial ray sparing procedure?

AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.

AU - Crisologo, Peter A.

AU - Yavuz, Metin

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063738776&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21037/atm.2019.02.46

DO - 10.21037/atm.2019.02.46

M3 - Editorial

VL - 7

JO - Journal of Threatened Taxa

JF - Journal of Threatened Taxa

SN - 0974-7893

M1 - S47

ER -