Use of the Muddiest Point Technique as an exam review in an integrated pharmacotherapy course

Katura C. Bullock, Caitlin Gibson, Meredith Howard, Jialiang Liu, Amulya Tatachar, Wei Cheng Yuet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact in student pharmacists’ exam performance learning outcomes and satisfaction after integrating the Muddiest Point assessment technique into exam reviews. Educational activity and setting: In 2016, the Muddiest Point, a formative assessment tool, was used to develop exam review sessions for second-year student pharmacists in an integrated pharmacotherapy course focused on the cardiovascular system. Performance scores on all four exams were compared between students in the 2015 and 2016 courses. Students’ complexity of learning was categorized using a taxonomy of learning structure. A survey was used to evaluate student perceptions of exam reviews and the Muddiest Point technique (MPT). Findings: Scores were higher on the second exam for the 83 students in the 2016 course (78.0% vs. 86.0%, p<0.001). There was no difference on other exam scores or overall course failures. Muddiest points submitted by students demonstrated a variety of taxonomy of learning levels. Student pharmacists surveyed at the conclusion of the course agreed that exam reviews were helpful for their preparation for exams and that the MPT was a valuable use of class time. Incorporating the MPT into exam reviews maintained exam scores and supported evaluation of student learning. In addition, student pharmacists were satisfied with this exam review method.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1295-1302
Number of pages8
JournalCurrents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Volume10
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Drug therapy
Students
Drug Therapy
Pharmacists
Learning
Taxonomies
Cardiovascular system
Cardiovascular System

Keywords

  • Classroom assessment technique
  • Exam review
  • Formative assessment
  • Integrated pharmacotherapy

Cite this

@article{3646f0a277bc4e11b818ac9011885026,
title = "Use of the Muddiest Point Technique as an exam review in an integrated pharmacotherapy course",
abstract = "Background and purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact in student pharmacists’ exam performance learning outcomes and satisfaction after integrating the Muddiest Point assessment technique into exam reviews. Educational activity and setting: In 2016, the Muddiest Point, a formative assessment tool, was used to develop exam review sessions for second-year student pharmacists in an integrated pharmacotherapy course focused on the cardiovascular system. Performance scores on all four exams were compared between students in the 2015 and 2016 courses. Students’ complexity of learning was categorized using a taxonomy of learning structure. A survey was used to evaluate student perceptions of exam reviews and the Muddiest Point technique (MPT). Findings: Scores were higher on the second exam for the 83 students in the 2016 course (78.0{\%} vs. 86.0{\%}, p<0.001). There was no difference on other exam scores or overall course failures. Muddiest points submitted by students demonstrated a variety of taxonomy of learning levels. Student pharmacists surveyed at the conclusion of the course agreed that exam reviews were helpful for their preparation for exams and that the MPT was a valuable use of class time. Incorporating the MPT into exam reviews maintained exam scores and supported evaluation of student learning. In addition, student pharmacists were satisfied with this exam review method.",
keywords = "Classroom assessment technique, Exam review, Formative assessment, Integrated pharmacotherapy",
author = "Bullock, {Katura C.} and Caitlin Gibson and Meredith Howard and Jialiang Liu and Amulya Tatachar and Yuet, {Wei Cheng}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.cptl.2018.06.014",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1295--1302",
journal = "Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning",
issn = "1877-1297",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of the Muddiest Point Technique as an exam review in an integrated pharmacotherapy course

AU - Bullock, Katura C.

AU - Gibson, Caitlin

AU - Howard, Meredith

AU - Liu, Jialiang

AU - Tatachar, Amulya

AU - Yuet, Wei Cheng

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Background and purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact in student pharmacists’ exam performance learning outcomes and satisfaction after integrating the Muddiest Point assessment technique into exam reviews. Educational activity and setting: In 2016, the Muddiest Point, a formative assessment tool, was used to develop exam review sessions for second-year student pharmacists in an integrated pharmacotherapy course focused on the cardiovascular system. Performance scores on all four exams were compared between students in the 2015 and 2016 courses. Students’ complexity of learning was categorized using a taxonomy of learning structure. A survey was used to evaluate student perceptions of exam reviews and the Muddiest Point technique (MPT). Findings: Scores were higher on the second exam for the 83 students in the 2016 course (78.0% vs. 86.0%, p<0.001). There was no difference on other exam scores or overall course failures. Muddiest points submitted by students demonstrated a variety of taxonomy of learning levels. Student pharmacists surveyed at the conclusion of the course agreed that exam reviews were helpful for their preparation for exams and that the MPT was a valuable use of class time. Incorporating the MPT into exam reviews maintained exam scores and supported evaluation of student learning. In addition, student pharmacists were satisfied with this exam review method.

AB - Background and purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact in student pharmacists’ exam performance learning outcomes and satisfaction after integrating the Muddiest Point assessment technique into exam reviews. Educational activity and setting: In 2016, the Muddiest Point, a formative assessment tool, was used to develop exam review sessions for second-year student pharmacists in an integrated pharmacotherapy course focused on the cardiovascular system. Performance scores on all four exams were compared between students in the 2015 and 2016 courses. Students’ complexity of learning was categorized using a taxonomy of learning structure. A survey was used to evaluate student perceptions of exam reviews and the Muddiest Point technique (MPT). Findings: Scores were higher on the second exam for the 83 students in the 2016 course (78.0% vs. 86.0%, p<0.001). There was no difference on other exam scores or overall course failures. Muddiest points submitted by students demonstrated a variety of taxonomy of learning levels. Student pharmacists surveyed at the conclusion of the course agreed that exam reviews were helpful for their preparation for exams and that the MPT was a valuable use of class time. Incorporating the MPT into exam reviews maintained exam scores and supported evaluation of student learning. In addition, student pharmacists were satisfied with this exam review method.

KW - Classroom assessment technique

KW - Exam review

KW - Formative assessment

KW - Integrated pharmacotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049448873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.06.014

DO - 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.06.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 30497634

AN - SCOPUS:85049448873

VL - 10

SP - 1295

EP - 1302

JO - Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

JF - Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

SN - 1877-1297

IS - 9

ER -