Trunk muscle endurance measurement: Isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects

Tom Mayer, Robert Gatchel, Jaime Betancur, Elizabeth Bovasso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. This cohort study examined a sample (n = 152) of subjects tested for isokinetic lumbar strength and endurance, using novel endurance measures. Objectives. To validate a new lumbar sagittal isokinetic endurance testing protocol comparing reliability in a normal subject cohort with strength test reliability to include presentation of a gender-specific normative database, and then correlating the results to a Sorenson isometric endurance protacal. Summary of Background Data. The isometric Sorenson test has been virtually the only validated clinical tool for lumbar extensor trunk muscle endurance testing. using an exercise chair and permitting the subject to maintain the trurk horizontal against gravity for a single timed contraction. Alternative isokinetic sagittal lumbar performance measurement methodology bas been developed recently to measure trunk muscle endurance by determining declining work performance on repeated, reciprocal dynamic contractions. Method. We compared protocols performance measures, normative data, and reliability for the static isometric Sorenson test to three different sokinetic endurance measurements: The endurance ratio, final fatigue ratio, and recovery ratio. Subjects were tested on a sagittal Cybex TEF (Lumex, Inc., Ronkonkoma, NY) unit for a strength trial followed by an endurance trial. Subgroups also performed reliability and isometric endurance protocols. Results. We found an extremely low lest-retest correlation for the isometric Sorenson trunk extension test. All test-retest correlations for the correspondng isokinetic endurance measures were significant and markedly higher. Extensor muscle performance declined more substantially on all endurance measures then flexors and showed more variability. In contrast, trunk strength measures were more reliable and less variable than corresponding endurance measures. Moreover, correlations between the isometric Sorenson test and the isokinetic endurance measures were all negative; i.e., increases in Sorenson time are moderately correlated to greater decline in work performance. Conclusions. Reliability of the Sorenson isometric endurance test is unacceptably low, showing negative correlations to all isokinetic endurance tests for lumbar extensors. Isokinetic strength and endurance tests are for more reliable than isometric tests, with normative data showing more consistent results from men than women. Both genders display more substantial fatigue (and greater variability) in extensor endurance compared with flexor testing. Endurance measures are identified as human performance cognitive constructs, and reasons for greater variability than usually shown by trunk strength measurements are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)920-926
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume20
Issue number8
StatePublished - Apr 1995

Fingerprint

Muscles
Fatigue
Gravitation
Cohort Studies
Databases
Work Performance

Keywords

  • Endurance
  • Fatigue
  • Human performance testing
  • Isokinetic
  • Isometric
  • Muscle
  • Physical capacity
  • Spinal disorders
  • Trunk strength

Cite this

Mayer, T., Gatchel, R., Betancur, J., & Bovasso, E. (1995). Trunk muscle endurance measurement: Isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects. Spine, 20(8), 920-926.
Mayer, Tom ; Gatchel, Robert ; Betancur, Jaime ; Bovasso, Elizabeth. / Trunk muscle endurance measurement : Isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects. In: Spine. 1995 ; Vol. 20, No. 8. pp. 920-926.
@article{1908f3e99de248a79e51c21e99fb6246,
title = "Trunk muscle endurance measurement: Isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects",
abstract = "Study Design. This cohort study examined a sample (n = 152) of subjects tested for isokinetic lumbar strength and endurance, using novel endurance measures. Objectives. To validate a new lumbar sagittal isokinetic endurance testing protocol comparing reliability in a normal subject cohort with strength test reliability to include presentation of a gender-specific normative database, and then correlating the results to a Sorenson isometric endurance protacal. Summary of Background Data. The isometric Sorenson test has been virtually the only validated clinical tool for lumbar extensor trunk muscle endurance testing. using an exercise chair and permitting the subject to maintain the trurk horizontal against gravity for a single timed contraction. Alternative isokinetic sagittal lumbar performance measurement methodology bas been developed recently to measure trunk muscle endurance by determining declining work performance on repeated, reciprocal dynamic contractions. Method. We compared protocols performance measures, normative data, and reliability for the static isometric Sorenson test to three different sokinetic endurance measurements: The endurance ratio, final fatigue ratio, and recovery ratio. Subjects were tested on a sagittal Cybex TEF (Lumex, Inc., Ronkonkoma, NY) unit for a strength trial followed by an endurance trial. Subgroups also performed reliability and isometric endurance protocols. Results. We found an extremely low lest-retest correlation for the isometric Sorenson trunk extension test. All test-retest correlations for the correspondng isokinetic endurance measures were significant and markedly higher. Extensor muscle performance declined more substantially on all endurance measures then flexors and showed more variability. In contrast, trunk strength measures were more reliable and less variable than corresponding endurance measures. Moreover, correlations between the isometric Sorenson test and the isokinetic endurance measures were all negative; i.e., increases in Sorenson time are moderately correlated to greater decline in work performance. Conclusions. Reliability of the Sorenson isometric endurance test is unacceptably low, showing negative correlations to all isokinetic endurance tests for lumbar extensors. Isokinetic strength and endurance tests are for more reliable than isometric tests, with normative data showing more consistent results from men than women. Both genders display more substantial fatigue (and greater variability) in extensor endurance compared with flexor testing. Endurance measures are identified as human performance cognitive constructs, and reasons for greater variability than usually shown by trunk strength measurements are discussed.",
keywords = "Endurance, Fatigue, Human performance testing, Isokinetic, Isometric, Muscle, Physical capacity, Spinal disorders, Trunk strength",
author = "Tom Mayer and Robert Gatchel and Jaime Betancur and Elizabeth Bovasso",
year = "1995",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "920--926",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

Mayer, T, Gatchel, R, Betancur, J & Bovasso, E 1995, 'Trunk muscle endurance measurement: Isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects', Spine, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 920-926.

Trunk muscle endurance measurement : Isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects. / Mayer, Tom; Gatchel, Robert; Betancur, Jaime; Bovasso, Elizabeth.

In: Spine, Vol. 20, No. 8, 04.1995, p. 920-926.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trunk muscle endurance measurement

T2 - Isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects

AU - Mayer, Tom

AU - Gatchel, Robert

AU - Betancur, Jaime

AU - Bovasso, Elizabeth

PY - 1995/4

Y1 - 1995/4

N2 - Study Design. This cohort study examined a sample (n = 152) of subjects tested for isokinetic lumbar strength and endurance, using novel endurance measures. Objectives. To validate a new lumbar sagittal isokinetic endurance testing protocol comparing reliability in a normal subject cohort with strength test reliability to include presentation of a gender-specific normative database, and then correlating the results to a Sorenson isometric endurance protacal. Summary of Background Data. The isometric Sorenson test has been virtually the only validated clinical tool for lumbar extensor trunk muscle endurance testing. using an exercise chair and permitting the subject to maintain the trurk horizontal against gravity for a single timed contraction. Alternative isokinetic sagittal lumbar performance measurement methodology bas been developed recently to measure trunk muscle endurance by determining declining work performance on repeated, reciprocal dynamic contractions. Method. We compared protocols performance measures, normative data, and reliability for the static isometric Sorenson test to three different sokinetic endurance measurements: The endurance ratio, final fatigue ratio, and recovery ratio. Subjects were tested on a sagittal Cybex TEF (Lumex, Inc., Ronkonkoma, NY) unit for a strength trial followed by an endurance trial. Subgroups also performed reliability and isometric endurance protocols. Results. We found an extremely low lest-retest correlation for the isometric Sorenson trunk extension test. All test-retest correlations for the correspondng isokinetic endurance measures were significant and markedly higher. Extensor muscle performance declined more substantially on all endurance measures then flexors and showed more variability. In contrast, trunk strength measures were more reliable and less variable than corresponding endurance measures. Moreover, correlations between the isometric Sorenson test and the isokinetic endurance measures were all negative; i.e., increases in Sorenson time are moderately correlated to greater decline in work performance. Conclusions. Reliability of the Sorenson isometric endurance test is unacceptably low, showing negative correlations to all isokinetic endurance tests for lumbar extensors. Isokinetic strength and endurance tests are for more reliable than isometric tests, with normative data showing more consistent results from men than women. Both genders display more substantial fatigue (and greater variability) in extensor endurance compared with flexor testing. Endurance measures are identified as human performance cognitive constructs, and reasons for greater variability than usually shown by trunk strength measurements are discussed.

AB - Study Design. This cohort study examined a sample (n = 152) of subjects tested for isokinetic lumbar strength and endurance, using novel endurance measures. Objectives. To validate a new lumbar sagittal isokinetic endurance testing protocol comparing reliability in a normal subject cohort with strength test reliability to include presentation of a gender-specific normative database, and then correlating the results to a Sorenson isometric endurance protacal. Summary of Background Data. The isometric Sorenson test has been virtually the only validated clinical tool for lumbar extensor trunk muscle endurance testing. using an exercise chair and permitting the subject to maintain the trurk horizontal against gravity for a single timed contraction. Alternative isokinetic sagittal lumbar performance measurement methodology bas been developed recently to measure trunk muscle endurance by determining declining work performance on repeated, reciprocal dynamic contractions. Method. We compared protocols performance measures, normative data, and reliability for the static isometric Sorenson test to three different sokinetic endurance measurements: The endurance ratio, final fatigue ratio, and recovery ratio. Subjects were tested on a sagittal Cybex TEF (Lumex, Inc., Ronkonkoma, NY) unit for a strength trial followed by an endurance trial. Subgroups also performed reliability and isometric endurance protocols. Results. We found an extremely low lest-retest correlation for the isometric Sorenson trunk extension test. All test-retest correlations for the correspondng isokinetic endurance measures were significant and markedly higher. Extensor muscle performance declined more substantially on all endurance measures then flexors and showed more variability. In contrast, trunk strength measures were more reliable and less variable than corresponding endurance measures. Moreover, correlations between the isometric Sorenson test and the isokinetic endurance measures were all negative; i.e., increases in Sorenson time are moderately correlated to greater decline in work performance. Conclusions. Reliability of the Sorenson isometric endurance test is unacceptably low, showing negative correlations to all isokinetic endurance tests for lumbar extensors. Isokinetic strength and endurance tests are for more reliable than isometric tests, with normative data showing more consistent results from men than women. Both genders display more substantial fatigue (and greater variability) in extensor endurance compared with flexor testing. Endurance measures are identified as human performance cognitive constructs, and reasons for greater variability than usually shown by trunk strength measurements are discussed.

KW - Endurance

KW - Fatigue

KW - Human performance testing

KW - Isokinetic

KW - Isometric

KW - Muscle

KW - Physical capacity

KW - Spinal disorders

KW - Trunk strength

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028943841&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7644957

AN - SCOPUS:0028943841

VL - 20

SP - 920

EP - 926

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 8

ER -

Mayer T, Gatchel R, Betancur J, Bovasso E. Trunk muscle endurance measurement: Isometric contrasted to isokinetic testing in normal subjects. Spine. 1995 Apr;20(8):920-926.