Time to defibrillation

A controlled laboratory study comparing three automated and semi-automated defibrillators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Currently there are three vendors marketing first-responder defibrillation units. Each vendor's unit has its own distinct features, advantages, and disadvantages, making the selection of one vendor's unit a complex decision. However, two critical performance criteria upon which a decision to choose one vendor's unit over another could be 1) differences in dysrhythmia recognition sensitivity and specificity and 2) time to delivery of a defibrillation shock. While there appears to be evidence suggesting no significant differences between the three units in terms of dysrhythmia recognition, there do not appear to be any controlled 'time-to-defibrillation' studies. The purpose of this study was to determine if, under controlled conditions, any performance differences existed between these three units in time to delivery of a defibrillation shock. The results of this study suggest that there are no pragmatic differences between the three defibrillation units. In the absence of time-to-defibrillation differences, EMS systems managers can place more emphasis on other features so as to better address the needs, concerns, and resources of their system.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-167
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 1989

Fingerprint

Defibrillators
Shock
Marketing
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • EMS management
  • EMS systems
  • automatic external defibrillators (AEDs)
  • defibrillation times
  • first responders

Cite this

@article{d3672a2ba63c4e3183640bfb35ad38aa,
title = "Time to defibrillation: A controlled laboratory study comparing three automated and semi-automated defibrillators",
abstract = "Currently there are three vendors marketing first-responder defibrillation units. Each vendor's unit has its own distinct features, advantages, and disadvantages, making the selection of one vendor's unit a complex decision. However, two critical performance criteria upon which a decision to choose one vendor's unit over another could be 1) differences in dysrhythmia recognition sensitivity and specificity and 2) time to delivery of a defibrillation shock. While there appears to be evidence suggesting no significant differences between the three units in terms of dysrhythmia recognition, there do not appear to be any controlled 'time-to-defibrillation' studies. The purpose of this study was to determine if, under controlled conditions, any performance differences existed between these three units in time to delivery of a defibrillation shock. The results of this study suggest that there are no pragmatic differences between the three defibrillation units. In the absence of time-to-defibrillation differences, EMS systems managers can place more emphasis on other features so as to better address the needs, concerns, and resources of their system.",
keywords = "EMS management, EMS systems, automatic external defibrillators (AEDs), defibrillation times, first responders",
author = "Papa, {Frank J.}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0736-4679(89)90264-3",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "163--167",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

Time to defibrillation : A controlled laboratory study comparing three automated and semi-automated defibrillators. / Papa, Frank J.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.01.1989, p. 163-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time to defibrillation

T2 - A controlled laboratory study comparing three automated and semi-automated defibrillators

AU - Papa, Frank J.

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Currently there are three vendors marketing first-responder defibrillation units. Each vendor's unit has its own distinct features, advantages, and disadvantages, making the selection of one vendor's unit a complex decision. However, two critical performance criteria upon which a decision to choose one vendor's unit over another could be 1) differences in dysrhythmia recognition sensitivity and specificity and 2) time to delivery of a defibrillation shock. While there appears to be evidence suggesting no significant differences between the three units in terms of dysrhythmia recognition, there do not appear to be any controlled 'time-to-defibrillation' studies. The purpose of this study was to determine if, under controlled conditions, any performance differences existed between these three units in time to delivery of a defibrillation shock. The results of this study suggest that there are no pragmatic differences between the three defibrillation units. In the absence of time-to-defibrillation differences, EMS systems managers can place more emphasis on other features so as to better address the needs, concerns, and resources of their system.

AB - Currently there are three vendors marketing first-responder defibrillation units. Each vendor's unit has its own distinct features, advantages, and disadvantages, making the selection of one vendor's unit a complex decision. However, two critical performance criteria upon which a decision to choose one vendor's unit over another could be 1) differences in dysrhythmia recognition sensitivity and specificity and 2) time to delivery of a defibrillation shock. While there appears to be evidence suggesting no significant differences between the three units in terms of dysrhythmia recognition, there do not appear to be any controlled 'time-to-defibrillation' studies. The purpose of this study was to determine if, under controlled conditions, any performance differences existed between these three units in time to delivery of a defibrillation shock. The results of this study suggest that there are no pragmatic differences between the three defibrillation units. In the absence of time-to-defibrillation differences, EMS systems managers can place more emphasis on other features so as to better address the needs, concerns, and resources of their system.

KW - EMS management

KW - EMS systems

KW - automatic external defibrillators (AEDs)

KW - defibrillation times

KW - first responders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024601589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0736-4679(89)90264-3

DO - 10.1016/0736-4679(89)90264-3

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 163

EP - 167

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 2

ER -