The Societal Cost of Tuberculosis

Tarrant County, Texas, 2002

Thaddeus L. Miller, Scott J.N. McNabb, Peter Hilsenrath, Jotam Pasipanodya, Gerry Drewyer, Stephen Weis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Cost analyses of tuberculosis (TB) in the United States have not included elements that may be prevented if TB were prevented, such as losses associated with TB-related disability, personal and other costs to society. Unmeasured TB costs lead to underestimates of the benefit of prevention and create conditions that could result in a resurgence of TB. We gathered data from Tarrant County, Texas, for 2002, to estimate the societal cost due to TB. Methods: We estimated societal costs due to the presence or suspicion of TB using known variable and fixed costs incurred to all parties. These include costs for infrastructure; diagnostics and surveillance; inpatient and outpatient treatment of active, suspected, and latent TB infection (LTBI); epidemiologic activities; personal costs borne by patients and by others for lost time, disability, and death; and the cost of secondary transmission. A discount rate of 3% was used. Results: During 2002, 108 TB cases were confirmed in Tarrant County, costing an estimated $40,574,953. The average societal cost per TB illness was $ 376,255. Secondary transmission created 47% and pulmonary impairment after TB created 35.4% of the total societal cost per illness. Conclusions: Prior estimates have concluded that treatment costs constitute most (86%) TB-related expenditures. From a societal perspective treatment and other direct costs account for little (3.3%) of the full burden. These data predict that preventing infection through earlier TB diagnosis and treatment of LTBI and expanding treatment of LTBI may be the most feasible strategies to reduce the cost of TB.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Epidemiology
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Tuberculosis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Infection
Latent Tuberculosis
Cost of Illness
Therapeutics
Health Expenditures
Health Care Costs
Inpatients
Early Diagnosis
Outpatients
Lung

Cite this

Miller, Thaddeus L. ; McNabb, Scott J.N. ; Hilsenrath, Peter ; Pasipanodya, Jotam ; Drewyer, Gerry ; Weis, Stephen. / The Societal Cost of Tuberculosis : Tarrant County, Texas, 2002. In: Annals of Epidemiology. 2010 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 1-7.
@article{542a88a32e6a4aafb2b1787f33f4b83f,
title = "The Societal Cost of Tuberculosis: Tarrant County, Texas, 2002",
abstract = "Purpose: Cost analyses of tuberculosis (TB) in the United States have not included elements that may be prevented if TB were prevented, such as losses associated with TB-related disability, personal and other costs to society. Unmeasured TB costs lead to underestimates of the benefit of prevention and create conditions that could result in a resurgence of TB. We gathered data from Tarrant County, Texas, for 2002, to estimate the societal cost due to TB. Methods: We estimated societal costs due to the presence or suspicion of TB using known variable and fixed costs incurred to all parties. These include costs for infrastructure; diagnostics and surveillance; inpatient and outpatient treatment of active, suspected, and latent TB infection (LTBI); epidemiologic activities; personal costs borne by patients and by others for lost time, disability, and death; and the cost of secondary transmission. A discount rate of 3{\%} was used. Results: During 2002, 108 TB cases were confirmed in Tarrant County, costing an estimated $40,574,953. The average societal cost per TB illness was $ 376,255. Secondary transmission created 47{\%} and pulmonary impairment after TB created 35.4{\%} of the total societal cost per illness. Conclusions: Prior estimates have concluded that treatment costs constitute most (86{\%}) TB-related expenditures. From a societal perspective treatment and other direct costs account for little (3.3{\%}) of the full burden. These data predict that preventing infection through earlier TB diagnosis and treatment of LTBI and expanding treatment of LTBI may be the most feasible strategies to reduce the cost of TB.",
author = "Miller, {Thaddeus L.} and McNabb, {Scott J.N.} and Peter Hilsenrath and Jotam Pasipanodya and Gerry Drewyer and Stephen Weis",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.09.004",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Annals of Epidemiology",
issn = "1047-2797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

The Societal Cost of Tuberculosis : Tarrant County, Texas, 2002. / Miller, Thaddeus L.; McNabb, Scott J.N.; Hilsenrath, Peter; Pasipanodya, Jotam; Drewyer, Gerry; Weis, Stephen.

In: Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Societal Cost of Tuberculosis

T2 - Tarrant County, Texas, 2002

AU - Miller, Thaddeus L.

AU - McNabb, Scott J.N.

AU - Hilsenrath, Peter

AU - Pasipanodya, Jotam

AU - Drewyer, Gerry

AU - Weis, Stephen

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Cost analyses of tuberculosis (TB) in the United States have not included elements that may be prevented if TB were prevented, such as losses associated with TB-related disability, personal and other costs to society. Unmeasured TB costs lead to underestimates of the benefit of prevention and create conditions that could result in a resurgence of TB. We gathered data from Tarrant County, Texas, for 2002, to estimate the societal cost due to TB. Methods: We estimated societal costs due to the presence or suspicion of TB using known variable and fixed costs incurred to all parties. These include costs for infrastructure; diagnostics and surveillance; inpatient and outpatient treatment of active, suspected, and latent TB infection (LTBI); epidemiologic activities; personal costs borne by patients and by others for lost time, disability, and death; and the cost of secondary transmission. A discount rate of 3% was used. Results: During 2002, 108 TB cases were confirmed in Tarrant County, costing an estimated $40,574,953. The average societal cost per TB illness was $ 376,255. Secondary transmission created 47% and pulmonary impairment after TB created 35.4% of the total societal cost per illness. Conclusions: Prior estimates have concluded that treatment costs constitute most (86%) TB-related expenditures. From a societal perspective treatment and other direct costs account for little (3.3%) of the full burden. These data predict that preventing infection through earlier TB diagnosis and treatment of LTBI and expanding treatment of LTBI may be the most feasible strategies to reduce the cost of TB.

AB - Purpose: Cost analyses of tuberculosis (TB) in the United States have not included elements that may be prevented if TB were prevented, such as losses associated with TB-related disability, personal and other costs to society. Unmeasured TB costs lead to underestimates of the benefit of prevention and create conditions that could result in a resurgence of TB. We gathered data from Tarrant County, Texas, for 2002, to estimate the societal cost due to TB. Methods: We estimated societal costs due to the presence or suspicion of TB using known variable and fixed costs incurred to all parties. These include costs for infrastructure; diagnostics and surveillance; inpatient and outpatient treatment of active, suspected, and latent TB infection (LTBI); epidemiologic activities; personal costs borne by patients and by others for lost time, disability, and death; and the cost of secondary transmission. A discount rate of 3% was used. Results: During 2002, 108 TB cases were confirmed in Tarrant County, costing an estimated $40,574,953. The average societal cost per TB illness was $ 376,255. Secondary transmission created 47% and pulmonary impairment after TB created 35.4% of the total societal cost per illness. Conclusions: Prior estimates have concluded that treatment costs constitute most (86%) TB-related expenditures. From a societal perspective treatment and other direct costs account for little (3.3%) of the full burden. These data predict that preventing infection through earlier TB diagnosis and treatment of LTBI and expanding treatment of LTBI may be the most feasible strategies to reduce the cost of TB.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71549114518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.09.004

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Annals of Epidemiology

JF - Annals of Epidemiology

SN - 1047-2797

IS - 1

ER -