The role of the built environment and private rooms for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections

Liam O'Neill, Sae Hwan Park, Francis Rosinia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Private hospital rooms are believed to offer some protective effect against hospital-acquired infections, including central line-associated bloodstream infections. Yet a recent meta-analysis found the evidence-base to be lacking from a policy perspective. We sought to determine whether private rooms were associated with a lower risk of central-line infections. We examined the discharge records of more than one million inpatients from 335 Texas hospitals to determine patients that stayed in private rooms. Patients who stayed in bay rooms had 64 percent more central line infections than patients who stayed in private rooms. Even after adjusting for relevant covariates, patients assigned to bay rooms had a 21 percent greater relative risk of a central line infection (p = 0.005), compared with patients assigned to private rooms. At the hospital level, a 10% increase in private rooms was associated with an 8.6% decrease in central line infections (p<0.001), regardless of individual patients’ room assignment. This study demonstrates and validates the use of private rooms as a structural measure and independent predictor of hospital quality.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0201002
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume13
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Patients' Rooms
blood flow
Infection
infection
cross infection
Private Hospitals
relative risk
meta-analysis
Cross Infection
protective effect
Meta-Analysis
Inpatients

Cite this

@article{110e816bac9946f8a4b4f2a81c2542ba,
title = "The role of the built environment and private rooms for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections",
abstract = "Private hospital rooms are believed to offer some protective effect against hospital-acquired infections, including central line-associated bloodstream infections. Yet a recent meta-analysis found the evidence-base to be lacking from a policy perspective. We sought to determine whether private rooms were associated with a lower risk of central-line infections. We examined the discharge records of more than one million inpatients from 335 Texas hospitals to determine patients that stayed in private rooms. Patients who stayed in bay rooms had 64 percent more central line infections than patients who stayed in private rooms. Even after adjusting for relevant covariates, patients assigned to bay rooms had a 21 percent greater relative risk of a central line infection (p = 0.005), compared with patients assigned to private rooms. At the hospital level, a 10{\%} increase in private rooms was associated with an 8.6{\%} decrease in central line infections (p<0.001), regardless of individual patients’ room assignment. This study demonstrates and validates the use of private rooms as a structural measure and independent predictor of hospital quality.",
author = "Liam O'Neill and Park, {Sae Hwan} and Francis Rosinia",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0201002",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "7",

}

The role of the built environment and private rooms for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections. / O'Neill, Liam; Park, Sae Hwan; Rosinia, Francis.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 13, No. 7, e0201002, 01.07.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of the built environment and private rooms for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections

AU - O'Neill, Liam

AU - Park, Sae Hwan

AU - Rosinia, Francis

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Private hospital rooms are believed to offer some protective effect against hospital-acquired infections, including central line-associated bloodstream infections. Yet a recent meta-analysis found the evidence-base to be lacking from a policy perspective. We sought to determine whether private rooms were associated with a lower risk of central-line infections. We examined the discharge records of more than one million inpatients from 335 Texas hospitals to determine patients that stayed in private rooms. Patients who stayed in bay rooms had 64 percent more central line infections than patients who stayed in private rooms. Even after adjusting for relevant covariates, patients assigned to bay rooms had a 21 percent greater relative risk of a central line infection (p = 0.005), compared with patients assigned to private rooms. At the hospital level, a 10% increase in private rooms was associated with an 8.6% decrease in central line infections (p<0.001), regardless of individual patients’ room assignment. This study demonstrates and validates the use of private rooms as a structural measure and independent predictor of hospital quality.

AB - Private hospital rooms are believed to offer some protective effect against hospital-acquired infections, including central line-associated bloodstream infections. Yet a recent meta-analysis found the evidence-base to be lacking from a policy perspective. We sought to determine whether private rooms were associated with a lower risk of central-line infections. We examined the discharge records of more than one million inpatients from 335 Texas hospitals to determine patients that stayed in private rooms. Patients who stayed in bay rooms had 64 percent more central line infections than patients who stayed in private rooms. Even after adjusting for relevant covariates, patients assigned to bay rooms had a 21 percent greater relative risk of a central line infection (p = 0.005), compared with patients assigned to private rooms. At the hospital level, a 10% increase in private rooms was associated with an 8.6% decrease in central line infections (p<0.001), regardless of individual patients’ room assignment. This study demonstrates and validates the use of private rooms as a structural measure and independent predictor of hospital quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052241480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0201002

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0201002

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 7

M1 - e0201002

ER -