The influence of research compensation options on Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) physician participation: A North Texas (NorTex) PBRN study

Richard A. Young, Kimberly G. Fulda, Sumihiro Suzuki, Kristen A. Hahn, Anna M. Espinoza, James D. Marshall, Billy J. Moore, Roberto Cardarelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To study the effect of two compensation approaches, continuing medical education (CME) credits (5 hours) or monetary ($150), on the participation rate of a physician needs assessment study. Methods: Physicians representing family medicine, internal medicine, pediatric, and geriatrics specialties, and practicing in ambulatory primary care clinics affiliated with the North Texas Primary Care (NorTex) PBRN clinics, were recruited to complete a survey relevant to their subspecialty and to conduct a self-audit/abstraction of five medical records. Physicians were recruited from four health care systems, and the recruiting methods varied by system. Study outcome was the rate of study completion by type of incentive. Results: One hundred five of 211 (49.8%) physicians approached to participate gave consent and 84 (39.8%) completed the study. There was no difference in the number of physicians randomly assigned to monetary compared with CME compensation for giving consent to participate (adjusted odds ratio = 1.42, confidence interval = 0.69, 2.93). However, physicians in the monetary compensation group were more likely to complete the study after giving consent (adjusted odds ratio = 4.70, confidence interval ∇ 1.25, 17.58). This monetary effect was also significant from the perspective of all physicians approached initially (adjusted odds ratio = 2.78, confidence interval = 1.16, 6.67). Discussion: This study suggests that future PBRN investigators should receive monetary compensation for the opportunity cost of adding research activities to their already busy practices. This compensation may be especially vital for PBRNs to complete more ambitious projects requiring a significant time commitment from the participating physicians.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)562-568
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Compensation and Redress
Physicians
Research
Continuing Medical Education
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Primary Health Care
Needs Assessment
Family Physicians
Ambulatory Care
Internal Medicine
Geriatrics
Medical Records
Motivation
Research Personnel
Medicine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pediatrics
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Physician behavior
  • Physician compensation
  • Practice-based research
  • Primary care
  • Research methods

Cite this

Young, Richard A. ; Fulda, Kimberly G. ; Suzuki, Sumihiro ; Hahn, Kristen A. ; Espinoza, Anna M. ; Marshall, James D. ; Moore, Billy J. ; Cardarelli, Roberto. / The influence of research compensation options on Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) physician participation : A North Texas (NorTex) PBRN study. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 562-568.
@article{168460a03f0b43f48cd64061428bb3a4,
title = "The influence of research compensation options on Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) physician participation: A North Texas (NorTex) PBRN study",
abstract = "Objective: To study the effect of two compensation approaches, continuing medical education (CME) credits (5 hours) or monetary ($150), on the participation rate of a physician needs assessment study. Methods: Physicians representing family medicine, internal medicine, pediatric, and geriatrics specialties, and practicing in ambulatory primary care clinics affiliated with the North Texas Primary Care (NorTex) PBRN clinics, were recruited to complete a survey relevant to their subspecialty and to conduct a self-audit/abstraction of five medical records. Physicians were recruited from four health care systems, and the recruiting methods varied by system. Study outcome was the rate of study completion by type of incentive. Results: One hundred five of 211 (49.8{\%}) physicians approached to participate gave consent and 84 (39.8{\%}) completed the study. There was no difference in the number of physicians randomly assigned to monetary compared with CME compensation for giving consent to participate (adjusted odds ratio = 1.42, confidence interval = 0.69, 2.93). However, physicians in the monetary compensation group were more likely to complete the study after giving consent (adjusted odds ratio = 4.70, confidence interval ∇ 1.25, 17.58). This monetary effect was also significant from the perspective of all physicians approached initially (adjusted odds ratio = 2.78, confidence interval = 1.16, 6.67). Discussion: This study suggests that future PBRN investigators should receive monetary compensation for the opportunity cost of adding research activities to their already busy practices. This compensation may be especially vital for PBRNs to complete more ambitious projects requiring a significant time commitment from the participating physicians.",
keywords = "Physician behavior, Physician compensation, Practice-based research, Primary care, Research methods",
author = "Young, {Richard A.} and Fulda, {Kimberly G.} and Sumihiro Suzuki and Hahn, {Kristen A.} and Espinoza, {Anna M.} and Marshall, {James D.} and Moore, {Billy J.} and Roberto Cardarelli",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.100291",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "562--568",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "5",

}

The influence of research compensation options on Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) physician participation : A North Texas (NorTex) PBRN study. / Young, Richard A.; Fulda, Kimberly G.; Suzuki, Sumihiro; Hahn, Kristen A.; Espinoza, Anna M.; Marshall, James D.; Moore, Billy J.; Cardarelli, Roberto.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 5, 01.09.2011, p. 562-568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of research compensation options on Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) physician participation

T2 - A North Texas (NorTex) PBRN study

AU - Young, Richard A.

AU - Fulda, Kimberly G.

AU - Suzuki, Sumihiro

AU - Hahn, Kristen A.

AU - Espinoza, Anna M.

AU - Marshall, James D.

AU - Moore, Billy J.

AU - Cardarelli, Roberto

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Objective: To study the effect of two compensation approaches, continuing medical education (CME) credits (5 hours) or monetary ($150), on the participation rate of a physician needs assessment study. Methods: Physicians representing family medicine, internal medicine, pediatric, and geriatrics specialties, and practicing in ambulatory primary care clinics affiliated with the North Texas Primary Care (NorTex) PBRN clinics, were recruited to complete a survey relevant to their subspecialty and to conduct a self-audit/abstraction of five medical records. Physicians were recruited from four health care systems, and the recruiting methods varied by system. Study outcome was the rate of study completion by type of incentive. Results: One hundred five of 211 (49.8%) physicians approached to participate gave consent and 84 (39.8%) completed the study. There was no difference in the number of physicians randomly assigned to monetary compared with CME compensation for giving consent to participate (adjusted odds ratio = 1.42, confidence interval = 0.69, 2.93). However, physicians in the monetary compensation group were more likely to complete the study after giving consent (adjusted odds ratio = 4.70, confidence interval ∇ 1.25, 17.58). This monetary effect was also significant from the perspective of all physicians approached initially (adjusted odds ratio = 2.78, confidence interval = 1.16, 6.67). Discussion: This study suggests that future PBRN investigators should receive monetary compensation for the opportunity cost of adding research activities to their already busy practices. This compensation may be especially vital for PBRNs to complete more ambitious projects requiring a significant time commitment from the participating physicians.

AB - Objective: To study the effect of two compensation approaches, continuing medical education (CME) credits (5 hours) or monetary ($150), on the participation rate of a physician needs assessment study. Methods: Physicians representing family medicine, internal medicine, pediatric, and geriatrics specialties, and practicing in ambulatory primary care clinics affiliated with the North Texas Primary Care (NorTex) PBRN clinics, were recruited to complete a survey relevant to their subspecialty and to conduct a self-audit/abstraction of five medical records. Physicians were recruited from four health care systems, and the recruiting methods varied by system. Study outcome was the rate of study completion by type of incentive. Results: One hundred five of 211 (49.8%) physicians approached to participate gave consent and 84 (39.8%) completed the study. There was no difference in the number of physicians randomly assigned to monetary compared with CME compensation for giving consent to participate (adjusted odds ratio = 1.42, confidence interval = 0.69, 2.93). However, physicians in the monetary compensation group were more likely to complete the study after giving consent (adjusted odds ratio = 4.70, confidence interval ∇ 1.25, 17.58). This monetary effect was also significant from the perspective of all physicians approached initially (adjusted odds ratio = 2.78, confidence interval = 1.16, 6.67). Discussion: This study suggests that future PBRN investigators should receive monetary compensation for the opportunity cost of adding research activities to their already busy practices. This compensation may be especially vital for PBRNs to complete more ambitious projects requiring a significant time commitment from the participating physicians.

KW - Physician behavior

KW - Physician compensation

KW - Practice-based research

KW - Primary care

KW - Research methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052876504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.100291

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.100291

M3 - Article

C2 - 21900439

AN - SCOPUS:80052876504

VL - 24

SP - 562

EP - 568

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 5

ER -