The effects of peer relational victimization on social cognition: Rejection attribution bias or a more generalized sensitivity to social pain?

Anna Park, Lauri A. Jensen-Campbell, Haylie Lauren Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study tested two possible ways that being relationally victimized may affect social cognition. Victims may develop a rejection attribution bias (i.e., experiencing social pain by engaging in cue distortion and attributing ambiguous social behavior to intentional rejection). Conversely, victims may develop a more generalized sensitivity to social pain, wherein they react negatively to a wider spectrum of social situations—even those in which they are obviously included and excluded). Participants (males = 55, females = 134) completed online surveys containing demographic, personality, and peer victimization measures. In a later session, participants came to the lab and were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: overt exclusion, ambiguous nonexclusion, and overt inclusion as part of an online ball-tossing game (Cyberball). The participants then completed self-report measures regarding their mood and experiences during the game. The results provided more support for the theoretical model that victims have a more generalized sensitivity to social pain; the rejection attribution theory was not supported.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)984-1006
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Social and Personal Relationships
Volume34
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2017

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Cyberball
  • rejection
  • relational victimization
  • social cognition
  • social pain

Cite this