Study of CTS DNA Proficiency Tests with Regard to DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review

Todd Bille, Michael D. Coble, Tim Kalafut, John Buckleton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The National Institute of Standards and Technology has released a document entitled DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review for public comment. This has become known as the Draft NIST Foundation Review. It contains the statement: "Across these 69 data sets, there were 80 false negatives and 18 false positives reported from 110,408 possible responses (27,602 participants × two evidence items × two reference items). In the past five years, the number of participants using PGS has grown." We examine a set of proficiency test results to determine if these NIST statements could be justified. The summary reports for each relevant forensic biology test (Forensic Biology, Semen, and Mixture) in the years 2018-2021 were reviewed. Data were also provided to us by CTS upon our request. None of the false positives or negatives could be attributed to the mixture interpretation strategy and certainly not to the use of PGS.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGenes
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 21 Nov 2022

Keywords

  • CTS
  • Forensic DNA interpretation
  • probabilistic genotyping
  • proficiency testing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Study of CTS DNA Proficiency Tests with Regard to DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this