Spring Break Versus Spring Broken

Predictive Utility of Spring Break Alcohol Intentions and Willingness at Varying Levels of Extremity

Dana Michelle Litt, Melissa Ardelle Lewis, Megan E. Patrick, Lindsey Rodriguez, Clayton Neighbors, Debra L. Kaysen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Within the domain of risk-related behavior, many times the decision to engage is not a product of premeditation or intention. The prototype willingness model was created to capture and explain the unintended element of risk behavior. The present study aimed to evaluate the importance of willingness versus intention, two important constructs within the prototype willingness model, in relation to spring break drinking behavior when assessed at both high and low extremities. College undergraduates (N = 275) completed questionnaires prior to spring break regarding their anticipated spring break activities. Willingness and intention were assessed for different levels of risk. Specifically, participants indicated the extent to which they intended to (a) get drunk and (b) drink enough to black out or pass out; and the extent to which they were willing to (a) get drunk and (b) drink enough to black out or pass out. When classes resumed following spring break, the students indicated the extent to which they actually (a) got drunk and (b) drank enough to black out or pass out. Results demonstrated that when the health-related risk was lower (i.e., getting drunk), intention was a stronger predictor of behavior than was willingness. However, as the level of risk increased (i.e., getting drunk enough to black out or pass out), willingness more strongly predicted behavior. The present study suggests that willingness and intentions differentially predict spring break alcohol-related behavior depending on the extremity of behavior in question. Implications regarding alcohol interventions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-93
Number of pages9
JournalPrevention Science
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Extremities
Alcohols
Drinking Behavior
Risk-Taking
Students
Health

Keywords

  • Alcohol use
  • Intentions
  • Prevention
  • Spring break
  • Willingness

Cite this

@article{f6f7d5658c9447ca95e6115616e15297,
title = "Spring Break Versus Spring Broken: Predictive Utility of Spring Break Alcohol Intentions and Willingness at Varying Levels of Extremity",
abstract = "Within the domain of risk-related behavior, many times the decision to engage is not a product of premeditation or intention. The prototype willingness model was created to capture and explain the unintended element of risk behavior. The present study aimed to evaluate the importance of willingness versus intention, two important constructs within the prototype willingness model, in relation to spring break drinking behavior when assessed at both high and low extremities. College undergraduates (N = 275) completed questionnaires prior to spring break regarding their anticipated spring break activities. Willingness and intention were assessed for different levels of risk. Specifically, participants indicated the extent to which they intended to (a) get drunk and (b) drink enough to black out or pass out; and the extent to which they were willing to (a) get drunk and (b) drink enough to black out or pass out. When classes resumed following spring break, the students indicated the extent to which they actually (a) got drunk and (b) drank enough to black out or pass out. Results demonstrated that when the health-related risk was lower (i.e., getting drunk), intention was a stronger predictor of behavior than was willingness. However, as the level of risk increased (i.e., getting drunk enough to black out or pass out), willingness more strongly predicted behavior. The present study suggests that willingness and intentions differentially predict spring break alcohol-related behavior depending on the extremity of behavior in question. Implications regarding alcohol interventions are discussed.",
keywords = "Alcohol use, Intentions, Prevention, Spring break, Willingness",
author = "Litt, {Dana Michelle} and Lewis, {Melissa Ardelle} and Patrick, {Megan E.} and Lindsey Rodriguez and Clayton Neighbors and Kaysen, {Debra L.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11121-012-0355-5",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "85--93",
journal = "Prevention Science",
issn = "1389-4986",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Spring Break Versus Spring Broken : Predictive Utility of Spring Break Alcohol Intentions and Willingness at Varying Levels of Extremity. / Litt, Dana Michelle; Lewis, Melissa Ardelle; Patrick, Megan E.; Rodriguez, Lindsey; Neighbors, Clayton; Kaysen, Debra L.

In: Prevention Science, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.02.2014, p. 85-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spring Break Versus Spring Broken

T2 - Predictive Utility of Spring Break Alcohol Intentions and Willingness at Varying Levels of Extremity

AU - Litt, Dana Michelle

AU - Lewis, Melissa Ardelle

AU - Patrick, Megan E.

AU - Rodriguez, Lindsey

AU - Neighbors, Clayton

AU - Kaysen, Debra L.

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - Within the domain of risk-related behavior, many times the decision to engage is not a product of premeditation or intention. The prototype willingness model was created to capture and explain the unintended element of risk behavior. The present study aimed to evaluate the importance of willingness versus intention, two important constructs within the prototype willingness model, in relation to spring break drinking behavior when assessed at both high and low extremities. College undergraduates (N = 275) completed questionnaires prior to spring break regarding their anticipated spring break activities. Willingness and intention were assessed for different levels of risk. Specifically, participants indicated the extent to which they intended to (a) get drunk and (b) drink enough to black out or pass out; and the extent to which they were willing to (a) get drunk and (b) drink enough to black out or pass out. When classes resumed following spring break, the students indicated the extent to which they actually (a) got drunk and (b) drank enough to black out or pass out. Results demonstrated that when the health-related risk was lower (i.e., getting drunk), intention was a stronger predictor of behavior than was willingness. However, as the level of risk increased (i.e., getting drunk enough to black out or pass out), willingness more strongly predicted behavior. The present study suggests that willingness and intentions differentially predict spring break alcohol-related behavior depending on the extremity of behavior in question. Implications regarding alcohol interventions are discussed.

AB - Within the domain of risk-related behavior, many times the decision to engage is not a product of premeditation or intention. The prototype willingness model was created to capture and explain the unintended element of risk behavior. The present study aimed to evaluate the importance of willingness versus intention, two important constructs within the prototype willingness model, in relation to spring break drinking behavior when assessed at both high and low extremities. College undergraduates (N = 275) completed questionnaires prior to spring break regarding their anticipated spring break activities. Willingness and intention were assessed for different levels of risk. Specifically, participants indicated the extent to which they intended to (a) get drunk and (b) drink enough to black out or pass out; and the extent to which they were willing to (a) get drunk and (b) drink enough to black out or pass out. When classes resumed following spring break, the students indicated the extent to which they actually (a) got drunk and (b) drank enough to black out or pass out. Results demonstrated that when the health-related risk was lower (i.e., getting drunk), intention was a stronger predictor of behavior than was willingness. However, as the level of risk increased (i.e., getting drunk enough to black out or pass out), willingness more strongly predicted behavior. The present study suggests that willingness and intentions differentially predict spring break alcohol-related behavior depending on the extremity of behavior in question. Implications regarding alcohol interventions are discussed.

KW - Alcohol use

KW - Intentions

KW - Prevention

KW - Spring break

KW - Willingness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907289438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11121-012-0355-5

DO - 10.1007/s11121-012-0355-5

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 85

EP - 93

JO - Prevention Science

JF - Prevention Science

SN - 1389-4986

IS - 1

ER -