Smoking status and psychosocioeconomic outcomes of functional restoration in patients with chronic spinal disability

Donald D. McGeary, Tom G. Mayer, Robert Joseph Gatchel, Christopher Anagnostis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background context: Studies have revealed smoking to have a negative impact on spinal surgery. It is assumed that this is the result of the negative impact of nicotine on revascularization of damaged tissue. However, there is a paucity of research on the role of smoking with regard to nonsurgical rehabilitation, but there exists a clear bias for believing that smoking is strongly associated with poor socioeconomic and psychosocial outcome. Purpose: This study was designed to examine the relationship between smoking and outcomes in a chronically disabled work-related spinal disorder (CDWRSD) cohort undergoing functional restoration. Study design: A prospective comparison cohort study investigating the effects of smoking status on functional restoration treatment outcomes. Patient sample: A cohort of 1,141 consecutive CDWRSD patients were divided into four groups: Group A, patients who did not smoke (n = 710); Group B, patients who smoked less than one cigarette pack/day (n = 157); Group C, patients who smoked 1.0 to 1.9 packs/day (n = 218); Group D, patients who smoked 2.0 or more packs/day (n = 56). Outcome measures: Before the start of functional restoration, and upon its completion, patients received a standard psychosocial assessment battery and were assessed on a variety of physical factors. A structured clinical interview examining socioeconomic outcomes was conducted 1 year after the program. Methods: Patients underwent an intensive functional restoration chronic pain management rehabilitation program consisting of quantitatively directed exercise progression and a multimodal disability management program for CDWRSD. The program consisted of four phases, the most significant of which involved a 3-week full-day intensive phase after preparatory preprogram phases and before a work transition phase. Results: Analysis revealed that the percent of males increased as the smoking level increased (Group A = 51.8% vs Group D = 73.2%; p<.001). Also, as smoking increased, the level of education significantly decreased. In addition, as smoking level increased, the percent of patients completing the rehabilitation program decreased (from 86.3% to 75%; p = .03). No significant differences in 1-year posttreatment socioeconomic outcomes of work status, health utilization, recurrent injury or case closure were related to smoking except work retention, which decreased with more smoking (85 to 71%, p<.05). Surprisingly, the physical cumulative score at posttreatment increased as smoking frequency increased (p<.01). This finding indicates that those who smoked more performed at a higher level on physical measures. Those who smoked more frequently before treatment also appeared more depressed (p<.001), but after treatment, these differences disappeared. Self-reported pain intensity differed only after treatment, and posttreatment disability ratings showed a significant linear trend. Conclusions: Contrary to popular belief, CDWRSD patients who smoke do not differ significantly in socioeconomic or psychosocial outcomes relative to those who do not. Although this study does indicate that those who smoke more evidence lower rehabilitation completion rates, those who completed the program had identical 1-year posttreatment outcomes of socioeconomic importance except in retraining work at year end as those who did not smoke. Smokers had slightly higher posttreatment self-reported pain and disability ratings mixed and limited. Overall, there is evidence for the widely held belief that smoking negatively affects tertiary rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)170-175
Number of pages6
JournalSpine Journal
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Smoking
Rehabilitation
Smoke
Pain
Phase Transition
Pain Management
Nicotine
Tobacco Products
Chronic Pain
Health Status
Cohort Studies
Therapeutics
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Interviews
Exercise
Education
Wounds and Injuries
Research

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Depression
  • Disability
  • Functional restoration
  • Occupational injury
  • Physical capacity
  • Smoking
  • Socioeconomic outcomes
  • Spinal disorders
  • Work-related

Cite this

McGeary, Donald D. ; Mayer, Tom G. ; Gatchel, Robert Joseph ; Anagnostis, Christopher. / Smoking status and psychosocioeconomic outcomes of functional restoration in patients with chronic spinal disability. In: Spine Journal. 2004 ; Vol. 4, No. 2. pp. 170-175.
@article{044fae0b5bd34796b05f0a15156fe95c,
title = "Smoking status and psychosocioeconomic outcomes of functional restoration in patients with chronic spinal disability",
abstract = "Background context: Studies have revealed smoking to have a negative impact on spinal surgery. It is assumed that this is the result of the negative impact of nicotine on revascularization of damaged tissue. However, there is a paucity of research on the role of smoking with regard to nonsurgical rehabilitation, but there exists a clear bias for believing that smoking is strongly associated with poor socioeconomic and psychosocial outcome. Purpose: This study was designed to examine the relationship between smoking and outcomes in a chronically disabled work-related spinal disorder (CDWRSD) cohort undergoing functional restoration. Study design: A prospective comparison cohort study investigating the effects of smoking status on functional restoration treatment outcomes. Patient sample: A cohort of 1,141 consecutive CDWRSD patients were divided into four groups: Group A, patients who did not smoke (n = 710); Group B, patients who smoked less than one cigarette pack/day (n = 157); Group C, patients who smoked 1.0 to 1.9 packs/day (n = 218); Group D, patients who smoked 2.0 or more packs/day (n = 56). Outcome measures: Before the start of functional restoration, and upon its completion, patients received a standard psychosocial assessment battery and were assessed on a variety of physical factors. A structured clinical interview examining socioeconomic outcomes was conducted 1 year after the program. Methods: Patients underwent an intensive functional restoration chronic pain management rehabilitation program consisting of quantitatively directed exercise progression and a multimodal disability management program for CDWRSD. The program consisted of four phases, the most significant of which involved a 3-week full-day intensive phase after preparatory preprogram phases and before a work transition phase. Results: Analysis revealed that the percent of males increased as the smoking level increased (Group A = 51.8{\%} vs Group D = 73.2{\%}; p<.001). Also, as smoking increased, the level of education significantly decreased. In addition, as smoking level increased, the percent of patients completing the rehabilitation program decreased (from 86.3{\%} to 75{\%}; p = .03). No significant differences in 1-year posttreatment socioeconomic outcomes of work status, health utilization, recurrent injury or case closure were related to smoking except work retention, which decreased with more smoking (85 to 71{\%}, p<.05). Surprisingly, the physical cumulative score at posttreatment increased as smoking frequency increased (p<.01). This finding indicates that those who smoked more performed at a higher level on physical measures. Those who smoked more frequently before treatment also appeared more depressed (p<.001), but after treatment, these differences disappeared. Self-reported pain intensity differed only after treatment, and posttreatment disability ratings showed a significant linear trend. Conclusions: Contrary to popular belief, CDWRSD patients who smoke do not differ significantly in socioeconomic or psychosocial outcomes relative to those who do not. Although this study does indicate that those who smoke more evidence lower rehabilitation completion rates, those who completed the program had identical 1-year posttreatment outcomes of socioeconomic importance except in retraining work at year end as those who did not smoke. Smokers had slightly higher posttreatment self-reported pain and disability ratings mixed and limited. Overall, there is evidence for the widely held belief that smoking negatively affects tertiary rehabilitation.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, Depression, Disability, Functional restoration, Occupational injury, Physical capacity, Smoking, Socioeconomic outcomes, Spinal disorders, Work-related",
author = "McGeary, {Donald D.} and Mayer, {Tom G.} and Gatchel, {Robert Joseph} and Christopher Anagnostis",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2003.08.030",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "170--175",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Smoking status and psychosocioeconomic outcomes of functional restoration in patients with chronic spinal disability. / McGeary, Donald D.; Mayer, Tom G.; Gatchel, Robert Joseph; Anagnostis, Christopher.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.03.2004, p. 170-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smoking status and psychosocioeconomic outcomes of functional restoration in patients with chronic spinal disability

AU - McGeary, Donald D.

AU - Mayer, Tom G.

AU - Gatchel, Robert Joseph

AU - Anagnostis, Christopher

PY - 2004/3/1

Y1 - 2004/3/1

N2 - Background context: Studies have revealed smoking to have a negative impact on spinal surgery. It is assumed that this is the result of the negative impact of nicotine on revascularization of damaged tissue. However, there is a paucity of research on the role of smoking with regard to nonsurgical rehabilitation, but there exists a clear bias for believing that smoking is strongly associated with poor socioeconomic and psychosocial outcome. Purpose: This study was designed to examine the relationship between smoking and outcomes in a chronically disabled work-related spinal disorder (CDWRSD) cohort undergoing functional restoration. Study design: A prospective comparison cohort study investigating the effects of smoking status on functional restoration treatment outcomes. Patient sample: A cohort of 1,141 consecutive CDWRSD patients were divided into four groups: Group A, patients who did not smoke (n = 710); Group B, patients who smoked less than one cigarette pack/day (n = 157); Group C, patients who smoked 1.0 to 1.9 packs/day (n = 218); Group D, patients who smoked 2.0 or more packs/day (n = 56). Outcome measures: Before the start of functional restoration, and upon its completion, patients received a standard psychosocial assessment battery and were assessed on a variety of physical factors. A structured clinical interview examining socioeconomic outcomes was conducted 1 year after the program. Methods: Patients underwent an intensive functional restoration chronic pain management rehabilitation program consisting of quantitatively directed exercise progression and a multimodal disability management program for CDWRSD. The program consisted of four phases, the most significant of which involved a 3-week full-day intensive phase after preparatory preprogram phases and before a work transition phase. Results: Analysis revealed that the percent of males increased as the smoking level increased (Group A = 51.8% vs Group D = 73.2%; p<.001). Also, as smoking increased, the level of education significantly decreased. In addition, as smoking level increased, the percent of patients completing the rehabilitation program decreased (from 86.3% to 75%; p = .03). No significant differences in 1-year posttreatment socioeconomic outcomes of work status, health utilization, recurrent injury or case closure were related to smoking except work retention, which decreased with more smoking (85 to 71%, p<.05). Surprisingly, the physical cumulative score at posttreatment increased as smoking frequency increased (p<.01). This finding indicates that those who smoked more performed at a higher level on physical measures. Those who smoked more frequently before treatment also appeared more depressed (p<.001), but after treatment, these differences disappeared. Self-reported pain intensity differed only after treatment, and posttreatment disability ratings showed a significant linear trend. Conclusions: Contrary to popular belief, CDWRSD patients who smoke do not differ significantly in socioeconomic or psychosocial outcomes relative to those who do not. Although this study does indicate that those who smoke more evidence lower rehabilitation completion rates, those who completed the program had identical 1-year posttreatment outcomes of socioeconomic importance except in retraining work at year end as those who did not smoke. Smokers had slightly higher posttreatment self-reported pain and disability ratings mixed and limited. Overall, there is evidence for the widely held belief that smoking negatively affects tertiary rehabilitation.

AB - Background context: Studies have revealed smoking to have a negative impact on spinal surgery. It is assumed that this is the result of the negative impact of nicotine on revascularization of damaged tissue. However, there is a paucity of research on the role of smoking with regard to nonsurgical rehabilitation, but there exists a clear bias for believing that smoking is strongly associated with poor socioeconomic and psychosocial outcome. Purpose: This study was designed to examine the relationship between smoking and outcomes in a chronically disabled work-related spinal disorder (CDWRSD) cohort undergoing functional restoration. Study design: A prospective comparison cohort study investigating the effects of smoking status on functional restoration treatment outcomes. Patient sample: A cohort of 1,141 consecutive CDWRSD patients were divided into four groups: Group A, patients who did not smoke (n = 710); Group B, patients who smoked less than one cigarette pack/day (n = 157); Group C, patients who smoked 1.0 to 1.9 packs/day (n = 218); Group D, patients who smoked 2.0 or more packs/day (n = 56). Outcome measures: Before the start of functional restoration, and upon its completion, patients received a standard psychosocial assessment battery and were assessed on a variety of physical factors. A structured clinical interview examining socioeconomic outcomes was conducted 1 year after the program. Methods: Patients underwent an intensive functional restoration chronic pain management rehabilitation program consisting of quantitatively directed exercise progression and a multimodal disability management program for CDWRSD. The program consisted of four phases, the most significant of which involved a 3-week full-day intensive phase after preparatory preprogram phases and before a work transition phase. Results: Analysis revealed that the percent of males increased as the smoking level increased (Group A = 51.8% vs Group D = 73.2%; p<.001). Also, as smoking increased, the level of education significantly decreased. In addition, as smoking level increased, the percent of patients completing the rehabilitation program decreased (from 86.3% to 75%; p = .03). No significant differences in 1-year posttreatment socioeconomic outcomes of work status, health utilization, recurrent injury or case closure were related to smoking except work retention, which decreased with more smoking (85 to 71%, p<.05). Surprisingly, the physical cumulative score at posttreatment increased as smoking frequency increased (p<.01). This finding indicates that those who smoked more performed at a higher level on physical measures. Those who smoked more frequently before treatment also appeared more depressed (p<.001), but after treatment, these differences disappeared. Self-reported pain intensity differed only after treatment, and posttreatment disability ratings showed a significant linear trend. Conclusions: Contrary to popular belief, CDWRSD patients who smoke do not differ significantly in socioeconomic or psychosocial outcomes relative to those who do not. Although this study does indicate that those who smoke more evidence lower rehabilitation completion rates, those who completed the program had identical 1-year posttreatment outcomes of socioeconomic importance except in retraining work at year end as those who did not smoke. Smokers had slightly higher posttreatment self-reported pain and disability ratings mixed and limited. Overall, there is evidence for the widely held belief that smoking negatively affects tertiary rehabilitation.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Depression

KW - Disability

KW - Functional restoration

KW - Occupational injury

KW - Physical capacity

KW - Smoking

KW - Socioeconomic outcomes

KW - Spinal disorders

KW - Work-related

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542319185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.08.030

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.08.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 15016394

AN - SCOPUS:1542319185

VL - 4

SP - 170

EP - 175

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 2

ER -