Requirements for certification in surgery

A comparison of the American board of surgery and the American osteopathic board of surgery

Paula M. Termuhlen, Albert Yurvati, Joseph J. Stella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In early 2014, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the American Osteopathic Association, and the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine agreed to a memorandum of understanding describing a single accreditation system for graduate medical education in the United States. Although there are many benefits, such as consistent quality of graduate medical education, alignment of competency standards, alignment with policymakers’ expectations, unification of voices on graduate medical education access and funding issues, and visibility of osteopathic medicine, there are also many challenges in creating a uniform system of graduate medical education. The authors review the pathways to initial certification for both the American Board of Surgery and the American Osteopathic Board of Surgery and discuss recertification and maintenance of certification.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)676-682
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Osteopathic Association
Volume116
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Graduate Medical Education
Certification
Osteopathic Medicine
Accreditation
Maintenance

Keywords

  • American board of medical specialties
  • American board of surgery
  • American osteopathic board of surgery
  • Board certification

Cite this

@article{e27ec38b5a824d80929e705743dae095,
title = "Requirements for certification in surgery: A comparison of the American board of surgery and the American osteopathic board of surgery",
abstract = "In early 2014, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the American Osteopathic Association, and the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine agreed to a memorandum of understanding describing a single accreditation system for graduate medical education in the United States. Although there are many benefits, such as consistent quality of graduate medical education, alignment of competency standards, alignment with policymakers’ expectations, unification of voices on graduate medical education access and funding issues, and visibility of osteopathic medicine, there are also many challenges in creating a uniform system of graduate medical education. The authors review the pathways to initial certification for both the American Board of Surgery and the American Osteopathic Board of Surgery and discuss recertification and maintenance of certification.",
keywords = "American board of medical specialties, American board of surgery, American osteopathic board of surgery, Board certification",
author = "Termuhlen, {Paula M.} and Albert Yurvati and Stella, {Joseph J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7556/jaoa.2016.132",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "676--682",
journal = "Journal of the American Osteopathic Association",
issn = "0098-6151",
publisher = "American Osteopathic Association",
number = "10",

}

Requirements for certification in surgery : A comparison of the American board of surgery and the American osteopathic board of surgery. / Termuhlen, Paula M.; Yurvati, Albert; Stella, Joseph J.

In: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Vol. 116, No. 10, 01.10.2016, p. 676-682.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Requirements for certification in surgery

T2 - A comparison of the American board of surgery and the American osteopathic board of surgery

AU - Termuhlen, Paula M.

AU - Yurvati, Albert

AU - Stella, Joseph J.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - In early 2014, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the American Osteopathic Association, and the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine agreed to a memorandum of understanding describing a single accreditation system for graduate medical education in the United States. Although there are many benefits, such as consistent quality of graduate medical education, alignment of competency standards, alignment with policymakers’ expectations, unification of voices on graduate medical education access and funding issues, and visibility of osteopathic medicine, there are also many challenges in creating a uniform system of graduate medical education. The authors review the pathways to initial certification for both the American Board of Surgery and the American Osteopathic Board of Surgery and discuss recertification and maintenance of certification.

AB - In early 2014, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the American Osteopathic Association, and the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine agreed to a memorandum of understanding describing a single accreditation system for graduate medical education in the United States. Although there are many benefits, such as consistent quality of graduate medical education, alignment of competency standards, alignment with policymakers’ expectations, unification of voices on graduate medical education access and funding issues, and visibility of osteopathic medicine, there are also many challenges in creating a uniform system of graduate medical education. The authors review the pathways to initial certification for both the American Board of Surgery and the American Osteopathic Board of Surgery and discuss recertification and maintenance of certification.

KW - American board of medical specialties

KW - American board of surgery

KW - American osteopathic board of surgery

KW - Board certification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988807153&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7556/jaoa.2016.132

DO - 10.7556/jaoa.2016.132

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 676

EP - 682

JO - Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

JF - Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

SN - 0098-6151

IS - 10

ER -