Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke: clinical data, challenges, and future directions

Wenbo Zhao, Sijie Li, Changhong Ren, Ran Meng, Kunlin Jin, Xunming Ji

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Despite great improvement during the past several decades, the management of stroke is still far from satisfactory, which warrants alternative or adjunctive strategies. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), an easy-to-use and noninvasive therapy, can be performed in various clinical scenarios (e.g., prehospital transportation, intrahospital, and at home), and it has been widely investigated for stroke management. RIC has been demonstrated to be well tolerated in patients with acute ischemic stroke and aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage, and it may benefit these patients by improving clinical outcomes; in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis, long-term repeated RIC could be safely performed and benefit patients by reducing recurrent ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack, as well as improving cerebral perfusion status; long-term repeated RIC may also benefit patients with cerebral small vessel disease by slowing cognitive decline and reducing volume of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI; in patients with severe carotid atherosclerotic stenosis undergoing stenting, preprocedural RIC could reduce the odds of new brain lesions on postprocedural MRI. Previous clinical studies suggest broad future prospects of RIC in the field of cerebrovascular diseases. However, the optimal RIC protocol and the mechanisms that RIC protects the brain is not fully clear, and there is lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers of RIC, all these dilemmas prevent RIC from entering clinical practice. This review focuses on recent advances in clinical studies of RIC in stroke management, its challenges, and the potential directions of future studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-196
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Stroke
Brain
Conditioning (Psychology)
Direction compound
Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases
Intracranial Arteriosclerosis
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Carotid Stenosis
Transient Ischemic Attack
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Aneurysm
Perfusion
Biomarkers

Cite this

Zhao, Wenbo ; Li, Sijie ; Ren, Changhong ; Meng, Ran ; Jin, Kunlin ; Ji, Xunming. / Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke : clinical data, challenges, and future directions. In: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 2019 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 186-196.
@article{0ff54e1af51c4791a5a31d063ae8e213,
title = "Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke: clinical data, challenges, and future directions",
abstract = "Despite great improvement during the past several decades, the management of stroke is still far from satisfactory, which warrants alternative or adjunctive strategies. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), an easy-to-use and noninvasive therapy, can be performed in various clinical scenarios (e.g., prehospital transportation, intrahospital, and at home), and it has been widely investigated for stroke management. RIC has been demonstrated to be well tolerated in patients with acute ischemic stroke and aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage, and it may benefit these patients by improving clinical outcomes; in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis, long-term repeated RIC could be safely performed and benefit patients by reducing recurrent ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack, as well as improving cerebral perfusion status; long-term repeated RIC may also benefit patients with cerebral small vessel disease by slowing cognitive decline and reducing volume of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI; in patients with severe carotid atherosclerotic stenosis undergoing stenting, preprocedural RIC could reduce the odds of new brain lesions on postprocedural MRI. Previous clinical studies suggest broad future prospects of RIC in the field of cerebrovascular diseases. However, the optimal RIC protocol and the mechanisms that RIC protects the brain is not fully clear, and there is lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers of RIC, all these dilemmas prevent RIC from entering clinical practice. This review focuses on recent advances in clinical studies of RIC in stroke management, its challenges, and the potential directions of future studies.",
author = "Wenbo Zhao and Sijie Li and Changhong Ren and Ran Meng and Kunlin Jin and Xunming Ji",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acn3.691",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "186--196",
journal = "Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology",
issn = "2328-9503",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke : clinical data, challenges, and future directions. / Zhao, Wenbo; Li, Sijie; Ren, Changhong; Meng, Ran; Jin, Kunlin; Ji, Xunming.

In: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 186-196.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Remote ischemic conditioning for stroke

T2 - clinical data, challenges, and future directions

AU - Zhao, Wenbo

AU - Li, Sijie

AU - Ren, Changhong

AU - Meng, Ran

AU - Jin, Kunlin

AU - Ji, Xunming

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - Despite great improvement during the past several decades, the management of stroke is still far from satisfactory, which warrants alternative or adjunctive strategies. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), an easy-to-use and noninvasive therapy, can be performed in various clinical scenarios (e.g., prehospital transportation, intrahospital, and at home), and it has been widely investigated for stroke management. RIC has been demonstrated to be well tolerated in patients with acute ischemic stroke and aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage, and it may benefit these patients by improving clinical outcomes; in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis, long-term repeated RIC could be safely performed and benefit patients by reducing recurrent ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack, as well as improving cerebral perfusion status; long-term repeated RIC may also benefit patients with cerebral small vessel disease by slowing cognitive decline and reducing volume of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI; in patients with severe carotid atherosclerotic stenosis undergoing stenting, preprocedural RIC could reduce the odds of new brain lesions on postprocedural MRI. Previous clinical studies suggest broad future prospects of RIC in the field of cerebrovascular diseases. However, the optimal RIC protocol and the mechanisms that RIC protects the brain is not fully clear, and there is lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers of RIC, all these dilemmas prevent RIC from entering clinical practice. This review focuses on recent advances in clinical studies of RIC in stroke management, its challenges, and the potential directions of future studies.

AB - Despite great improvement during the past several decades, the management of stroke is still far from satisfactory, which warrants alternative or adjunctive strategies. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), an easy-to-use and noninvasive therapy, can be performed in various clinical scenarios (e.g., prehospital transportation, intrahospital, and at home), and it has been widely investigated for stroke management. RIC has been demonstrated to be well tolerated in patients with acute ischemic stroke and aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage, and it may benefit these patients by improving clinical outcomes; in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis, long-term repeated RIC could be safely performed and benefit patients by reducing recurrent ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack, as well as improving cerebral perfusion status; long-term repeated RIC may also benefit patients with cerebral small vessel disease by slowing cognitive decline and reducing volume of white matter hyperintensities on brain MRI; in patients with severe carotid atherosclerotic stenosis undergoing stenting, preprocedural RIC could reduce the odds of new brain lesions on postprocedural MRI. Previous clinical studies suggest broad future prospects of RIC in the field of cerebrovascular diseases. However, the optimal RIC protocol and the mechanisms that RIC protects the brain is not fully clear, and there is lack of sensitive and specific biomarkers of RIC, all these dilemmas prevent RIC from entering clinical practice. This review focuses on recent advances in clinical studies of RIC in stroke management, its challenges, and the potential directions of future studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056447267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acn3.691

DO - 10.1002/acn3.691

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85056447267

VL - 6

SP - 186

EP - 196

JO - Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology

JF - Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology

SN - 2328-9503

IS - 1

ER -