Protocol for the "Implementation, adoption, and utility of family history in diverse care settings" study

for the Family Health History Network

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Risk assessment with a thorough family health history is recommended by numerous organizations and is now a required component of the annual physical for Medicare beneficiaries under the Affordable Care Act. However, there are several barriers to incorporating robust risk assessments into routine care. MeTree, a web-based patient-facing health risk assessment tool, was developed with the aim of overcoming these barriers. In order to better understand what factors will be instrumental for broader adoption of risk assessment programs like MeTree in clinical settings, we obtained funding to perform a type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness study in primary care clinics at five diverse healthcare systems. Here, we describe the study's protocol. Methods/design: MeTree collects personal medical information and a three-generation family health history from patients on 98 conditions. Using algorithms built entirely from current clinical guidelines, it provides clinical decision support to providers and patients on 30 conditions. All adult patients with an upcoming well-visit appointment at one of the 20 intervention clinics are eligible to participate. Patient-oriented risk reports are provided in real time. Provider-oriented risk reports are uploaded to the electronic medical record for review at the time of the appointment. Implementation outcomes are enrollment rate of clinics, providers, and patients (enrolled vs approached) and their representativeness compared to the underlying population. Primary effectiveness outcomes are the percent of participants newly identified as being at increased risk for one of the clinical decision support conditions and the percent with appropriate risk-based screening. Secondary outcomes include percent change in those meeting goals for a healthy lifestyle (diet, exercise, and smoking). Outcomes are measured through electronic medical record data abstraction, patient surveys, and surveys/qualitative interviews of clinical staff. Discussion: This study evaluates factors that are critical to successful implementation of a web-based risk assessment tool into routine clinical care in a variety of healthcare settings. The result will identify resource needs and potential barriers and solutions to implementation in each setting as well as an understanding potential effectiveness. Trial registration:NCT01956773

Original languageEnglish
Article number163
JournalImplementation Science
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 24 Nov 2015

Fingerprint

Medical History Taking
Clinical Decision Support Systems
Electronic Health Records
Appointments and Schedules
Delivery of Health Care
Medicare
Primary Health Care
Smoking
Organizations
Guidelines
Interviews
Exercise
Health
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Family health history
  • Prevention
  • Primary care
  • Risk stratification

Cite this

@article{d1a3a2f69a204b75b0bb2395df9b801f,
title = "Protocol for the {"}Implementation, adoption, and utility of family history in diverse care settings{"} study",
abstract = "Background: Risk assessment with a thorough family health history is recommended by numerous organizations and is now a required component of the annual physical for Medicare beneficiaries under the Affordable Care Act. However, there are several barriers to incorporating robust risk assessments into routine care. MeTree, a web-based patient-facing health risk assessment tool, was developed with the aim of overcoming these barriers. In order to better understand what factors will be instrumental for broader adoption of risk assessment programs like MeTree in clinical settings, we obtained funding to perform a type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness study in primary care clinics at five diverse healthcare systems. Here, we describe the study's protocol. Methods/design: MeTree collects personal medical information and a three-generation family health history from patients on 98 conditions. Using algorithms built entirely from current clinical guidelines, it provides clinical decision support to providers and patients on 30 conditions. All adult patients with an upcoming well-visit appointment at one of the 20 intervention clinics are eligible to participate. Patient-oriented risk reports are provided in real time. Provider-oriented risk reports are uploaded to the electronic medical record for review at the time of the appointment. Implementation outcomes are enrollment rate of clinics, providers, and patients (enrolled vs approached) and their representativeness compared to the underlying population. Primary effectiveness outcomes are the percent of participants newly identified as being at increased risk for one of the clinical decision support conditions and the percent with appropriate risk-based screening. Secondary outcomes include percent change in those meeting goals for a healthy lifestyle (diet, exercise, and smoking). Outcomes are measured through electronic medical record data abstraction, patient surveys, and surveys/qualitative interviews of clinical staff. Discussion: This study evaluates factors that are critical to successful implementation of a web-based risk assessment tool into routine clinical care in a variety of healthcare settings. The result will identify resource needs and potential barriers and solutions to implementation in each setting as well as an understanding potential effectiveness. Trial registration:NCT01956773",
keywords = "Family health history, Prevention, Primary care, Risk stratification",
author = "{for the Family Health History Network} and Wu, {R. Ryanne} and Myers, {Rachel A.} and McCarty, {Catherine A.} and David Dimmock and Michael Farrell and Cross, {Deanna Sue} and Chinevere, {Troy D.} and Ginsburg, {Geoffrey S.} and Orlando, {Lori A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1186/s13012-015-0352-8",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Protocol for the "Implementation, adoption, and utility of family history in diverse care settings" study. / for the Family Health History Network.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 10, No. 1, 163, 24.11.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protocol for the "Implementation, adoption, and utility of family history in diverse care settings" study

AU - for the Family Health History Network

AU - Wu, R. Ryanne

AU - Myers, Rachel A.

AU - McCarty, Catherine A.

AU - Dimmock, David

AU - Farrell, Michael

AU - Cross, Deanna Sue

AU - Chinevere, Troy D.

AU - Ginsburg, Geoffrey S.

AU - Orlando, Lori A.

PY - 2015/11/24

Y1 - 2015/11/24

N2 - Background: Risk assessment with a thorough family health history is recommended by numerous organizations and is now a required component of the annual physical for Medicare beneficiaries under the Affordable Care Act. However, there are several barriers to incorporating robust risk assessments into routine care. MeTree, a web-based patient-facing health risk assessment tool, was developed with the aim of overcoming these barriers. In order to better understand what factors will be instrumental for broader adoption of risk assessment programs like MeTree in clinical settings, we obtained funding to perform a type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness study in primary care clinics at five diverse healthcare systems. Here, we describe the study's protocol. Methods/design: MeTree collects personal medical information and a three-generation family health history from patients on 98 conditions. Using algorithms built entirely from current clinical guidelines, it provides clinical decision support to providers and patients on 30 conditions. All adult patients with an upcoming well-visit appointment at one of the 20 intervention clinics are eligible to participate. Patient-oriented risk reports are provided in real time. Provider-oriented risk reports are uploaded to the electronic medical record for review at the time of the appointment. Implementation outcomes are enrollment rate of clinics, providers, and patients (enrolled vs approached) and their representativeness compared to the underlying population. Primary effectiveness outcomes are the percent of participants newly identified as being at increased risk for one of the clinical decision support conditions and the percent with appropriate risk-based screening. Secondary outcomes include percent change in those meeting goals for a healthy lifestyle (diet, exercise, and smoking). Outcomes are measured through electronic medical record data abstraction, patient surveys, and surveys/qualitative interviews of clinical staff. Discussion: This study evaluates factors that are critical to successful implementation of a web-based risk assessment tool into routine clinical care in a variety of healthcare settings. The result will identify resource needs and potential barriers and solutions to implementation in each setting as well as an understanding potential effectiveness. Trial registration:NCT01956773

AB - Background: Risk assessment with a thorough family health history is recommended by numerous organizations and is now a required component of the annual physical for Medicare beneficiaries under the Affordable Care Act. However, there are several barriers to incorporating robust risk assessments into routine care. MeTree, a web-based patient-facing health risk assessment tool, was developed with the aim of overcoming these barriers. In order to better understand what factors will be instrumental for broader adoption of risk assessment programs like MeTree in clinical settings, we obtained funding to perform a type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness study in primary care clinics at five diverse healthcare systems. Here, we describe the study's protocol. Methods/design: MeTree collects personal medical information and a three-generation family health history from patients on 98 conditions. Using algorithms built entirely from current clinical guidelines, it provides clinical decision support to providers and patients on 30 conditions. All adult patients with an upcoming well-visit appointment at one of the 20 intervention clinics are eligible to participate. Patient-oriented risk reports are provided in real time. Provider-oriented risk reports are uploaded to the electronic medical record for review at the time of the appointment. Implementation outcomes are enrollment rate of clinics, providers, and patients (enrolled vs approached) and their representativeness compared to the underlying population. Primary effectiveness outcomes are the percent of participants newly identified as being at increased risk for one of the clinical decision support conditions and the percent with appropriate risk-based screening. Secondary outcomes include percent change in those meeting goals for a healthy lifestyle (diet, exercise, and smoking). Outcomes are measured through electronic medical record data abstraction, patient surveys, and surveys/qualitative interviews of clinical staff. Discussion: This study evaluates factors that are critical to successful implementation of a web-based risk assessment tool into routine clinical care in a variety of healthcare settings. The result will identify resource needs and potential barriers and solutions to implementation in each setting as well as an understanding potential effectiveness. Trial registration:NCT01956773

KW - Family health history

KW - Prevention

KW - Primary care

KW - Risk stratification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947771452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-015-0352-8

DO - 10.1186/s13012-015-0352-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 26597091

AN - SCOPUS:84947771452

VL - 10

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

IS - 1

M1 - 163

ER -