Predicting risk for disciplinary action by a state medical board.

Roberto Cardarelli, John C. Licciardone, Gilbert Ramirez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations


Disciplinary actions taken against physicians in the United States have been increasing over the last decade, yet the factors that place physicians at risk have not been well identified. The objective of this study is to identify predictors of physician disciplinary action. This case-control study used data from the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners from January 1989 through December 1998. Characteristics of disciplined physicians and predictors of disciplinary action for all violations and by type of violation were the main outcome descriptors. Years in practice, black physicians, and osteopathic graduates were positive predictors for disciplinary action. In contrast, female physicians, international medical graduates, and Hispanic and Asian physicians were less likely to receive disciplinary action compared with male, US allopathic, and white physicians, respectively. Most specialists, except psychiatrists and obstetrician-gynecologists, were less likely to be disciplined than were family practitioners, whereas general practitioners were more likely to be disciplined. More studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)84-90
Number of pages7
JournalTexas medicine
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2004


Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting risk for disciplinary action by a state medical board.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this