Performance profiles and cut-off scores on the Memory Assessment Scales

Sid E. O'Bryant, Kevin Duff, Jerid Fisher, Robert J. McCaffrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The increased role of neuropsychologists in the courtroom has led to an increased effort in the detection of possible symptom exaggeration/malingering. Whereas domain specific measures of malingering have traditionally been used in this detection process, the identification of performance profiles and cut-off scores on standard neuropsychological assessment instruments may provide an alternate strategy. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of performance profiles and cut-off scores in discriminating traumatic brain injury (TBI) litigants suspected of malingering from those not suspected of malingering on the Memory Assessment Scales (MAS). Results suggest that TBI litigants suspected of poor effort will perform globally at a lower level than TBI litigants not suspected of poor effort on nearly all MAS indices, however, the performance profiles of each group was similar. Cut-off scores, especially when used in combination, were also effective in correctly classifying individuals in the two groups. The present findings warrant further research examining the utility of the proposed cut-off scores separately and concomitantly. Such research will aid the clinical neuropsychological practitioner in interpreting aberrant performance profiles on the MAS in forensic situations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-496
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2004

Fingerprint

Malingering
Research
Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Malingering
  • Memory Assessment Scales
  • TBI litigants
  • Test of Memory Malingering

Cite this

O'Bryant, Sid E. ; Duff, Kevin ; Fisher, Jerid ; McCaffrey, Robert J. / Performance profiles and cut-off scores on the Memory Assessment Scales. In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 489-496.
@article{1ce8e89d87a54ad8a447ec6cbf48fad5,
title = "Performance profiles and cut-off scores on the Memory Assessment Scales",
abstract = "The increased role of neuropsychologists in the courtroom has led to an increased effort in the detection of possible symptom exaggeration/malingering. Whereas domain specific measures of malingering have traditionally been used in this detection process, the identification of performance profiles and cut-off scores on standard neuropsychological assessment instruments may provide an alternate strategy. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of performance profiles and cut-off scores in discriminating traumatic brain injury (TBI) litigants suspected of malingering from those not suspected of malingering on the Memory Assessment Scales (MAS). Results suggest that TBI litigants suspected of poor effort will perform globally at a lower level than TBI litigants not suspected of poor effort on nearly all MAS indices, however, the performance profiles of each group was similar. Cut-off scores, especially when used in combination, were also effective in correctly classifying individuals in the two groups. The present findings warrant further research examining the utility of the proposed cut-off scores separately and concomitantly. Such research will aid the clinical neuropsychological practitioner in interpreting aberrant performance profiles on the MAS in forensic situations.",
keywords = "Malingering, Memory Assessment Scales, TBI litigants, Test of Memory Malingering",
author = "O'Bryant, {Sid E.} and Kevin Duff and Jerid Fisher and McCaffrey, {Robert J.}",
year = "2004",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.acn.2003.07.001",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "489--496",
journal = "Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology",
issn = "0887-6177",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

Performance profiles and cut-off scores on the Memory Assessment Scales. / O'Bryant, Sid E.; Duff, Kevin; Fisher, Jerid; McCaffrey, Robert J.

In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.06.2004, p. 489-496.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance profiles and cut-off scores on the Memory Assessment Scales

AU - O'Bryant, Sid E.

AU - Duff, Kevin

AU - Fisher, Jerid

AU - McCaffrey, Robert J.

PY - 2004/6/1

Y1 - 2004/6/1

N2 - The increased role of neuropsychologists in the courtroom has led to an increased effort in the detection of possible symptom exaggeration/malingering. Whereas domain specific measures of malingering have traditionally been used in this detection process, the identification of performance profiles and cut-off scores on standard neuropsychological assessment instruments may provide an alternate strategy. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of performance profiles and cut-off scores in discriminating traumatic brain injury (TBI) litigants suspected of malingering from those not suspected of malingering on the Memory Assessment Scales (MAS). Results suggest that TBI litigants suspected of poor effort will perform globally at a lower level than TBI litigants not suspected of poor effort on nearly all MAS indices, however, the performance profiles of each group was similar. Cut-off scores, especially when used in combination, were also effective in correctly classifying individuals in the two groups. The present findings warrant further research examining the utility of the proposed cut-off scores separately and concomitantly. Such research will aid the clinical neuropsychological practitioner in interpreting aberrant performance profiles on the MAS in forensic situations.

AB - The increased role of neuropsychologists in the courtroom has led to an increased effort in the detection of possible symptom exaggeration/malingering. Whereas domain specific measures of malingering have traditionally been used in this detection process, the identification of performance profiles and cut-off scores on standard neuropsychological assessment instruments may provide an alternate strategy. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of performance profiles and cut-off scores in discriminating traumatic brain injury (TBI) litigants suspected of malingering from those not suspected of malingering on the Memory Assessment Scales (MAS). Results suggest that TBI litigants suspected of poor effort will perform globally at a lower level than TBI litigants not suspected of poor effort on nearly all MAS indices, however, the performance profiles of each group was similar. Cut-off scores, especially when used in combination, were also effective in correctly classifying individuals in the two groups. The present findings warrant further research examining the utility of the proposed cut-off scores separately and concomitantly. Such research will aid the clinical neuropsychological practitioner in interpreting aberrant performance profiles on the MAS in forensic situations.

KW - Malingering

KW - Memory Assessment Scales

KW - TBI litigants

KW - Test of Memory Malingering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2442547199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acn.2003.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.acn.2003.07.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 15163450

AN - SCOPUS:2442547199

VL - 19

SP - 489

EP - 496

JO - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

JF - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

SN - 0887-6177

IS - 4

ER -