Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for low back pain: A randomized crossover study

Keyphrases

• Low Back Pain 100%
• Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation 100%
• Randomized Crossover Study 100%
• Sham 21%
• Exercise Therapy 21%
• Stimulation Therapy 21%
• Opioid Analgesics 15%
• Sham Control 10%
• Physical Activity 10%
• Analgesic Drugs 10%
• Visual Analog Pain Scale 10%
• Sleep Quality 10%
• United States 5%
• Visual Analog Scale 5%
• Patient Assessment 5%
• Adverse Effects 5%
• Short Form 36 (SF-36) 5%
• Disability 5%
• Patient Demographics 5%
• Health Status 5%
• Physical Function 5%
• Flexion-extension 5%
• Medication Use 5%
• Ambulatory Pain 5%
• Long-term Benefit 5%
• Pain Treatment 5%
• Extension Exercises 5%
• Physical Quality 5%
• Aftertreatment 5%
• Wages 5%
• University Medical Centre 5%
• SF-36 Questionnaire 5%
• Oral Intake 5%
• Sense of Well-being 5%
• Non-pharmacological 5%
• Management Center 5%
• Status Survey 5%
• Pain Management 5%
• Degenerative Disc Disease 5%
• Therapeutic Modalities 5%
• Activity Quality 5%
• Assessment Questionnaire 5%
• Pain Relief 5%

Medicine and Dentistry

• Low Back Pain 100%
• Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation 100%
• Stimulation Therapy 21%
• Kinesiotherapy 21%
• Visual Analog Scale 15%
• Anodyne 15%
• Short Form 36 10%
• Physical Activity 10%
• Analgesia 10%
• Quality of Sleep 10%
• Disease 5%
• Adverse Event 5%
• Patient Population 5%
• Drug Therapy 5%
• Health Status 5%
• Opiate 5%
• Patient Assessment 5%
• Therapeutic Modality 5%

Nursing and Health Professions

• Low Back Pain 100%
• Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation 100%
• Kinesiotherapy 21%
• Visual Analog Scale 15%
• Analgesic Agent 15%
• Pill 15%
• Short Form 36 10%
• Analgesia 10%
• Disease 5%
• Drug Therapy 5%
• Adverse Event 5%
• Patient Population 5%
• Health Status 5%
• Therapeutic Modality 5%
• Opiate 5%
• Patient Assessment 5%
• University Hospital 5%