Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial

John C. Licciardone, Scott T. Stoll, Kimberly G. Fulda, David P. Russo, Jeff Siu, William Winn, Jon Swift

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

153 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Objective. To determine the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment as a complementary treatment for chronic nonspecific low back pain. Summary of Background Data. Osteopathic manipulative treatment may be useful for acute of subacute low back pain. However, its role in chronic low back pain is unclear. Methods. This trial was conducted in a university-based clinic from 2000 through 2001. Of the 199 subjects who responded to recruitment procedures, 91 met the eligibility criteria. They were randomized, with 82 patients completing the 1-month follow-up evaluation, 71 completing the 3-month evaluation, and 66 completing the 6-month evaluation. The subjects were randomized to osteopathic manipulative treatment, sham manipulation, or a no-intervention control group, and they were allowed to continue their usual care for low back pain. The main outcomes included the SF-36 Health Survey, a 10-cm visual analog scare for overall back pain, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, lost work or school days because of back pain, and satisfaction with back care. Results. As compared with the no-intervention control subjects, the patients who received osteopathic manipulative treatment reported greater improvements in back pain, greater satisfaction with back care throughout the trial, better physical functioning and mental health at 1 month, and fewer cotreatments at 6 months. The subjects who received sham manipulation also reported greater improvements in back pain and physical functioning and greater satisfaction than the no-intervention control subjects. There were no significant benefits with osteopathic manipulative treatment, as compared with sham manipulation. Conclusions. Osteopathic manipulative treatment and sham manipulation both appear to provide some benefits chronic nonspecific low back pain. It remains unclear whether the benefits of osteopathic manipulative treatment can be attributed to the manipulative techniques themselves or whether they are related to other aspects of osteopathic manipulative treatment, such as range of motion activities or time spent interacting with patients, which may represent placebo effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1355-1362
Number of pages8
JournalSpine
Volume28
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2003

Fingerprint

Osteopathic Manipulation
Low Back Pain
Randomized Controlled Trials
Back Pain
Placebo Effect
Articular Range of Motion
Health Surveys
Mental Health

Keywords

  • Low back pain
  • Orthopedic manipulation
  • Osteopathic manipulative treatment
  • Osteopathic medicine
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Physical functioning
  • Randomized controlled trial

Cite this

Licciardone, John C. ; Stoll, Scott T. ; Fulda, Kimberly G. ; Russo, David P. ; Siu, Jeff ; Winn, William ; Swift, Jon. / Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain : A randomized controlled trial. In: Spine. 2003 ; Vol. 28, No. 13. pp. 1355-1362.
@article{0b59828105534b2ca0f93c7dc21e9872,
title = "Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Study Design. A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Objective. To determine the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment as a complementary treatment for chronic nonspecific low back pain. Summary of Background Data. Osteopathic manipulative treatment may be useful for acute of subacute low back pain. However, its role in chronic low back pain is unclear. Methods. This trial was conducted in a university-based clinic from 2000 through 2001. Of the 199 subjects who responded to recruitment procedures, 91 met the eligibility criteria. They were randomized, with 82 patients completing the 1-month follow-up evaluation, 71 completing the 3-month evaluation, and 66 completing the 6-month evaluation. The subjects were randomized to osteopathic manipulative treatment, sham manipulation, or a no-intervention control group, and they were allowed to continue their usual care for low back pain. The main outcomes included the SF-36 Health Survey, a 10-cm visual analog scare for overall back pain, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, lost work or school days because of back pain, and satisfaction with back care. Results. As compared with the no-intervention control subjects, the patients who received osteopathic manipulative treatment reported greater improvements in back pain, greater satisfaction with back care throughout the trial, better physical functioning and mental health at 1 month, and fewer cotreatments at 6 months. The subjects who received sham manipulation also reported greater improvements in back pain and physical functioning and greater satisfaction than the no-intervention control subjects. There were no significant benefits with osteopathic manipulative treatment, as compared with sham manipulation. Conclusions. Osteopathic manipulative treatment and sham manipulation both appear to provide some benefits chronic nonspecific low back pain. It remains unclear whether the benefits of osteopathic manipulative treatment can be attributed to the manipulative techniques themselves or whether they are related to other aspects of osteopathic manipulative treatment, such as range of motion activities or time spent interacting with patients, which may represent placebo effects.",
keywords = "Low back pain, Orthopedic manipulation, Osteopathic manipulative treatment, Osteopathic medicine, Patient satisfaction, Physical functioning, Randomized controlled trial",
author = "Licciardone, {John C.} and Stoll, {Scott T.} and Fulda, {Kimberly G.} and Russo, {David P.} and Jeff Siu and William Winn and Jon Swift",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.BRS.0000067110.61471.7D",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1355--1362",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "13",

}

Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain : A randomized controlled trial. / Licciardone, John C.; Stoll, Scott T.; Fulda, Kimberly G.; Russo, David P.; Siu, Jeff; Winn, William; Swift, Jon.

In: Spine, Vol. 28, No. 13, 01.07.2003, p. 1355-1362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Licciardone, John C.

AU - Stoll, Scott T.

AU - Fulda, Kimberly G.

AU - Russo, David P.

AU - Siu, Jeff

AU - Winn, William

AU - Swift, Jon

PY - 2003/7/1

Y1 - 2003/7/1

N2 - Study Design. A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Objective. To determine the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment as a complementary treatment for chronic nonspecific low back pain. Summary of Background Data. Osteopathic manipulative treatment may be useful for acute of subacute low back pain. However, its role in chronic low back pain is unclear. Methods. This trial was conducted in a university-based clinic from 2000 through 2001. Of the 199 subjects who responded to recruitment procedures, 91 met the eligibility criteria. They were randomized, with 82 patients completing the 1-month follow-up evaluation, 71 completing the 3-month evaluation, and 66 completing the 6-month evaluation. The subjects were randomized to osteopathic manipulative treatment, sham manipulation, or a no-intervention control group, and they were allowed to continue their usual care for low back pain. The main outcomes included the SF-36 Health Survey, a 10-cm visual analog scare for overall back pain, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, lost work or school days because of back pain, and satisfaction with back care. Results. As compared with the no-intervention control subjects, the patients who received osteopathic manipulative treatment reported greater improvements in back pain, greater satisfaction with back care throughout the trial, better physical functioning and mental health at 1 month, and fewer cotreatments at 6 months. The subjects who received sham manipulation also reported greater improvements in back pain and physical functioning and greater satisfaction than the no-intervention control subjects. There were no significant benefits with osteopathic manipulative treatment, as compared with sham manipulation. Conclusions. Osteopathic manipulative treatment and sham manipulation both appear to provide some benefits chronic nonspecific low back pain. It remains unclear whether the benefits of osteopathic manipulative treatment can be attributed to the manipulative techniques themselves or whether they are related to other aspects of osteopathic manipulative treatment, such as range of motion activities or time spent interacting with patients, which may represent placebo effects.

AB - Study Design. A randomized controlled trial was conducted. Objective. To determine the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment as a complementary treatment for chronic nonspecific low back pain. Summary of Background Data. Osteopathic manipulative treatment may be useful for acute of subacute low back pain. However, its role in chronic low back pain is unclear. Methods. This trial was conducted in a university-based clinic from 2000 through 2001. Of the 199 subjects who responded to recruitment procedures, 91 met the eligibility criteria. They were randomized, with 82 patients completing the 1-month follow-up evaluation, 71 completing the 3-month evaluation, and 66 completing the 6-month evaluation. The subjects were randomized to osteopathic manipulative treatment, sham manipulation, or a no-intervention control group, and they were allowed to continue their usual care for low back pain. The main outcomes included the SF-36 Health Survey, a 10-cm visual analog scare for overall back pain, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, lost work or school days because of back pain, and satisfaction with back care. Results. As compared with the no-intervention control subjects, the patients who received osteopathic manipulative treatment reported greater improvements in back pain, greater satisfaction with back care throughout the trial, better physical functioning and mental health at 1 month, and fewer cotreatments at 6 months. The subjects who received sham manipulation also reported greater improvements in back pain and physical functioning and greater satisfaction than the no-intervention control subjects. There were no significant benefits with osteopathic manipulative treatment, as compared with sham manipulation. Conclusions. Osteopathic manipulative treatment and sham manipulation both appear to provide some benefits chronic nonspecific low back pain. It remains unclear whether the benefits of osteopathic manipulative treatment can be attributed to the manipulative techniques themselves or whether they are related to other aspects of osteopathic manipulative treatment, such as range of motion activities or time spent interacting with patients, which may represent placebo effects.

KW - Low back pain

KW - Orthopedic manipulation

KW - Osteopathic manipulative treatment

KW - Osteopathic medicine

KW - Patient satisfaction

KW - Physical functioning

KW - Randomized controlled trial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038015662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067110.61471.7D

DO - 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067110.61471.7D

M3 - Article

C2 - 12838090

AN - SCOPUS:0038015662

VL - 28

SP - 1355

EP - 1362

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 13

ER -