On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal

Kevin Duff; Sid E. O'Bryant; Holly James Westervelt; Jerry J. Sweet; Cecil R. Reynolds; Wilfred G. Van Gorp; Daniel Tranel; Robert J. McCaffrey

doi:10.1093/arclin/acp031

On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal

Kevin Duff, Sid E. O'Bryant, Holly James Westervelt, Jerry J. Sweet, Cecil R. Reynolds, Wilfred G. Van Gorp, Daniel Tranel, Robert J. McCaffrey

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The peer-review process is an invaluable service provided by the professional community, and it provides the critical foundation for the advancement of science. However, there is remarkably little systematic guidance for individuals who wish to become part of this process. This paper, written from the perspective of reviewers and editors with varying levels of experience, provides general guidelines and advice for new reviewers in neuropsychology, as well as outlining benefits of participation in this process. It is hoped that the current information will encourage individuals at all levels to become involved in peer-reviewing for neuropsychology journals.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	201-207
Number of pages	7
Journal	Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Volume	24
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp031
State	Published - May 2009

Keywords

Professional issues
Statistical methods
Test construction

Access to Document

10.1093/arclin/acp031

Cite this

@article{9ddab9c85b57426bb658da0d0ff02629,

title = "On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal",

abstract = "The peer-review process is an invaluable service provided by the professional community, and it provides the critical foundation for the advancement of science. However, there is remarkably little systematic guidance for individuals who wish to become part of this process. This paper, written from the perspective of reviewers and editors with varying levels of experience, provides general guidelines and advice for new reviewers in neuropsychology, as well as outlining benefits of participation in this process. It is hoped that the current information will encourage individuals at all levels to become involved in peer-reviewing for neuropsychology journals.",

keywords = "Professional issues, Statistical methods, Test construction",

author = "Kevin Duff and O'Bryant, {Sid E.} and Westervelt, {Holly James} and Sweet, {Jerry J.} and Reynolds, {Cecil R.} and {Van Gorp}, {Wilfred G.} and Daniel Tranel and McCaffrey, {Robert J.}",

year = "2009",

month = may,

doi = "10.1093/arclin/acp031",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "201--207",

journal = "Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology",

issn = "0887-6177",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal

AU - Duff, Kevin

AU - O'Bryant, Sid E.

AU - Westervelt, Holly James

AU - Sweet, Jerry J.

AU - Reynolds, Cecil R.

AU - Van Gorp, Wilfred G.

AU - Tranel, Daniel

AU - McCaffrey, Robert J.

PY - 2009/5

Y1 - 2009/5

N2 - The peer-review process is an invaluable service provided by the professional community, and it provides the critical foundation for the advancement of science. However, there is remarkably little systematic guidance for individuals who wish to become part of this process. This paper, written from the perspective of reviewers and editors with varying levels of experience, provides general guidelines and advice for new reviewers in neuropsychology, as well as outlining benefits of participation in this process. It is hoped that the current information will encourage individuals at all levels to become involved in peer-reviewing for neuropsychology journals.

AB - The peer-review process is an invaluable service provided by the professional community, and it provides the critical foundation for the advancement of science. However, there is remarkably little systematic guidance for individuals who wish to become part of this process. This paper, written from the perspective of reviewers and editors with varying levels of experience, provides general guidelines and advice for new reviewers in neuropsychology, as well as outlining benefits of participation in this process. It is hoped that the current information will encourage individuals at all levels to become involved in peer-reviewing for neuropsychology journals.

KW - Professional issues

KW - Statistical methods

KW - Test construction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69249117390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/arclin/acp031

DO - 10.1093/arclin/acp031

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 19640873

AN - SCOPUS:69249117390

SN - 0887-6177

VL - 24

SP - 201

EP - 207

JO - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

JF - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

IS - 3

ER -

On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this