Occupational physician perceptions of bioterrorism

David Sterling, Bruce Clements, Terri Rebmann, Brooke N. Shadel, Laveta M. Stewart, Robert Thomas, R. Gregory Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The rationale for most preparedness training of healthcare professionals is based on the assumption that most persons infected following a biological incident will present first to emergency departments of acute care facilities or to ambulatory settings such as private physician offices, and such incidences would be recognized, appropriately treated, and reported to the local health departments. However, an alternative first point of contact is industry, a location where workers gather and disperse on a regular and documented basis, and require healthcare. In industry there are health professionals responsible for the health, safety and on-site well-being of the workforce and surrounding community; these professionals are in a position for early recognition, surveillance, and isolation. Targeted education must be provided to these health professionals. To address perceptions of risk and preferred educational delivery methods for bioterrorism and emerging infections-related materials, a survey of occupational physicians was performed during the spring of 2001. Within the 2 months following the September 11 terrorist attack and subsequent anthrax bioterrorism event, and before release of any results from the first survey, a follow-up mail survey was initiated in November 2001. Response rate to the pre- and post-September 11 survey were 58% (n=56) and 33% (n=33), respectively. No significant demographic differences were observed between the respondents of the pre- and post-surveys. Perceptions of likelihood of another bioterrorism event increased between surveys, as would be expected; however, a tendency to believe that it would not happen locally persisted. Even though over 90% of the physicians had received immediate training following September 11, additional training/education needs were demonstrated. Although training and education modules can be designed without information based on the population that can be on the receiving end, it rarely accomplishes its goal. Results from this survey can serve as a base for designing various levels of targeted training and educational material specific to the perceived need, method of obtaining information and the format considered to be most conducive for learning. Potential consequences from lack of bioterrorism preparedness due to low perception of need and threat awareness need to be addressed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-134
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Volume208
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - 8 Apr 2005

Fingerprint

Bioterrorism
Physicians
Health
Education
Biohazard Release
Industry
September 11 Terrorist Attacks
Delivery of Health Care
Surveys and Questionnaires
Physicians' Offices
Anthrax
Postal Service
Hospital Emergency Service
Demography
Learning
Safety

Keywords

  • Bioterrorism
  • Education delivery
  • Emerging infections
  • Occupational physicians
  • Perceptions

Cite this

Sterling, D., Clements, B., Rebmann, T., Shadel, B. N., Stewart, L. M., Thomas, R., & Gregory Evans, R. (2005). Occupational physician perceptions of bioterrorism. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 208(1-2), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.01.012
Sterling, David ; Clements, Bruce ; Rebmann, Terri ; Shadel, Brooke N. ; Stewart, Laveta M. ; Thomas, Robert ; Gregory Evans, R. / Occupational physician perceptions of bioterrorism. In: International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2005 ; Vol. 208, No. 1-2. pp. 127-134.
@article{9b5874915a6e4feab9e2fe5bbb795355,
title = "Occupational physician perceptions of bioterrorism",
abstract = "The rationale for most preparedness training of healthcare professionals is based on the assumption that most persons infected following a biological incident will present first to emergency departments of acute care facilities or to ambulatory settings such as private physician offices, and such incidences would be recognized, appropriately treated, and reported to the local health departments. However, an alternative first point of contact is industry, a location where workers gather and disperse on a regular and documented basis, and require healthcare. In industry there are health professionals responsible for the health, safety and on-site well-being of the workforce and surrounding community; these professionals are in a position for early recognition, surveillance, and isolation. Targeted education must be provided to these health professionals. To address perceptions of risk and preferred educational delivery methods for bioterrorism and emerging infections-related materials, a survey of occupational physicians was performed during the spring of 2001. Within the 2 months following the September 11 terrorist attack and subsequent anthrax bioterrorism event, and before release of any results from the first survey, a follow-up mail survey was initiated in November 2001. Response rate to the pre- and post-September 11 survey were 58{\%} (n=56) and 33{\%} (n=33), respectively. No significant demographic differences were observed between the respondents of the pre- and post-surveys. Perceptions of likelihood of another bioterrorism event increased between surveys, as would be expected; however, a tendency to believe that it would not happen locally persisted. Even though over 90{\%} of the physicians had received immediate training following September 11, additional training/education needs were demonstrated. Although training and education modules can be designed without information based on the population that can be on the receiving end, it rarely accomplishes its goal. Results from this survey can serve as a base for designing various levels of targeted training and educational material specific to the perceived need, method of obtaining information and the format considered to be most conducive for learning. Potential consequences from lack of bioterrorism preparedness due to low perception of need and threat awareness need to be addressed.",
keywords = "Bioterrorism, Education delivery, Emerging infections, Occupational physicians, Perceptions",
author = "David Sterling and Bruce Clements and Terri Rebmann and Shadel, {Brooke N.} and Stewart, {Laveta M.} and Robert Thomas and {Gregory Evans}, R.",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.01.012",
language = "English",
volume = "208",
pages = "127--134",
journal = "International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health",
issn = "1438-4639",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena",
number = "1-2",

}

Sterling, D, Clements, B, Rebmann, T, Shadel, BN, Stewart, LM, Thomas, R & Gregory Evans, R 2005, 'Occupational physician perceptions of bioterrorism', International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, vol. 208, no. 1-2, pp. 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.01.012

Occupational physician perceptions of bioterrorism. / Sterling, David; Clements, Bruce; Rebmann, Terri; Shadel, Brooke N.; Stewart, Laveta M.; Thomas, Robert; Gregory Evans, R.

In: International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, Vol. 208, No. 1-2, 08.04.2005, p. 127-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occupational physician perceptions of bioterrorism

AU - Sterling, David

AU - Clements, Bruce

AU - Rebmann, Terri

AU - Shadel, Brooke N.

AU - Stewart, Laveta M.

AU - Thomas, Robert

AU - Gregory Evans, R.

PY - 2005/4/8

Y1 - 2005/4/8

N2 - The rationale for most preparedness training of healthcare professionals is based on the assumption that most persons infected following a biological incident will present first to emergency departments of acute care facilities or to ambulatory settings such as private physician offices, and such incidences would be recognized, appropriately treated, and reported to the local health departments. However, an alternative first point of contact is industry, a location where workers gather and disperse on a regular and documented basis, and require healthcare. In industry there are health professionals responsible for the health, safety and on-site well-being of the workforce and surrounding community; these professionals are in a position for early recognition, surveillance, and isolation. Targeted education must be provided to these health professionals. To address perceptions of risk and preferred educational delivery methods for bioterrorism and emerging infections-related materials, a survey of occupational physicians was performed during the spring of 2001. Within the 2 months following the September 11 terrorist attack and subsequent anthrax bioterrorism event, and before release of any results from the first survey, a follow-up mail survey was initiated in November 2001. Response rate to the pre- and post-September 11 survey were 58% (n=56) and 33% (n=33), respectively. No significant demographic differences were observed between the respondents of the pre- and post-surveys. Perceptions of likelihood of another bioterrorism event increased between surveys, as would be expected; however, a tendency to believe that it would not happen locally persisted. Even though over 90% of the physicians had received immediate training following September 11, additional training/education needs were demonstrated. Although training and education modules can be designed without information based on the population that can be on the receiving end, it rarely accomplishes its goal. Results from this survey can serve as a base for designing various levels of targeted training and educational material specific to the perceived need, method of obtaining information and the format considered to be most conducive for learning. Potential consequences from lack of bioterrorism preparedness due to low perception of need and threat awareness need to be addressed.

AB - The rationale for most preparedness training of healthcare professionals is based on the assumption that most persons infected following a biological incident will present first to emergency departments of acute care facilities or to ambulatory settings such as private physician offices, and such incidences would be recognized, appropriately treated, and reported to the local health departments. However, an alternative first point of contact is industry, a location where workers gather and disperse on a regular and documented basis, and require healthcare. In industry there are health professionals responsible for the health, safety and on-site well-being of the workforce and surrounding community; these professionals are in a position for early recognition, surveillance, and isolation. Targeted education must be provided to these health professionals. To address perceptions of risk and preferred educational delivery methods for bioterrorism and emerging infections-related materials, a survey of occupational physicians was performed during the spring of 2001. Within the 2 months following the September 11 terrorist attack and subsequent anthrax bioterrorism event, and before release of any results from the first survey, a follow-up mail survey was initiated in November 2001. Response rate to the pre- and post-September 11 survey were 58% (n=56) and 33% (n=33), respectively. No significant demographic differences were observed between the respondents of the pre- and post-surveys. Perceptions of likelihood of another bioterrorism event increased between surveys, as would be expected; however, a tendency to believe that it would not happen locally persisted. Even though over 90% of the physicians had received immediate training following September 11, additional training/education needs were demonstrated. Although training and education modules can be designed without information based on the population that can be on the receiving end, it rarely accomplishes its goal. Results from this survey can serve as a base for designing various levels of targeted training and educational material specific to the perceived need, method of obtaining information and the format considered to be most conducive for learning. Potential consequences from lack of bioterrorism preparedness due to low perception of need and threat awareness need to be addressed.

KW - Bioterrorism

KW - Education delivery

KW - Emerging infections

KW - Occupational physicians

KW - Perceptions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16244380513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.01.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ijheh.2005.01.012

M3 - Article

VL - 208

SP - 127

EP - 134

JO - International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health

JF - International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health

SN - 1438-4639

IS - 1-2

ER -