Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care

Lettie Flores, Robert Joseph Gatchel, Peter B. Polatin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. In this article, the authors review the three broad categories of measures that have been used to objectify functional improvement after nonoperative care of painful spinal disorder patients - physical, psychological, and socioeconomic. For each of the three categories, the major measures used are discussed, as well as research relating to the efficacy of the measures. Objectives. To point out the many differences that still exist among research studies regarding which functional outcome measures to use and when to use them. Summary of Background Data. During the past few decades, it has been made abundantly clear that painful spinal disorders, particularly when associated with work disability and/or financial benefits, result from a complex interaction of medical, psychological, and social factors. This has resulted in frequent confusion regarding what constitutes the primary roots of the disabling process. Currently, a more comprehensive biopsychosocial perspective of chronic pain and disability has emerged that has significant implications for diagnostic and treatment philosophies of practitioners. Methods. Identifying the measures frequently used to address the important biopsychosocial factors, and evaluating their relative benefits and drawbacks. Results and Conclusions. It is demonstrated that there has been an overall trend in recent years toward using more objective, quantifiable instruments, encompassing the physical, psychological, and socioeconomic parameters of outcomes research in painful spinal disorders. These changes will certainly improve the ability of researchers to tease out which factors tap more directly into such issues as physical impairment, as well as create greater uniformity of measures that will permit direct comparisons between studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1622-1633
Number of pages12
JournalSpine
Volume22
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Jul 1997

Fingerprint

Psychology
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Aptitude
Research
Chronic Pain
Research Personnel
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Function
  • Nonoperative care
  • Physical impairment
  • Quantification
  • Spinal disorders

Cite this

Flores, Lettie ; Gatchel, Robert Joseph ; Polatin, Peter B. / Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care. In: Spine. 1997 ; Vol. 22, No. 14. pp. 1622-1633.
@article{1e94869ef95f438da3084bb3a698c040,
title = "Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care",
abstract = "Study Design. In this article, the authors review the three broad categories of measures that have been used to objectify functional improvement after nonoperative care of painful spinal disorder patients - physical, psychological, and socioeconomic. For each of the three categories, the major measures used are discussed, as well as research relating to the efficacy of the measures. Objectives. To point out the many differences that still exist among research studies regarding which functional outcome measures to use and when to use them. Summary of Background Data. During the past few decades, it has been made abundantly clear that painful spinal disorders, particularly when associated with work disability and/or financial benefits, result from a complex interaction of medical, psychological, and social factors. This has resulted in frequent confusion regarding what constitutes the primary roots of the disabling process. Currently, a more comprehensive biopsychosocial perspective of chronic pain and disability has emerged that has significant implications for diagnostic and treatment philosophies of practitioners. Methods. Identifying the measures frequently used to address the important biopsychosocial factors, and evaluating their relative benefits and drawbacks. Results and Conclusions. It is demonstrated that there has been an overall trend in recent years toward using more objective, quantifiable instruments, encompassing the physical, psychological, and socioeconomic parameters of outcomes research in painful spinal disorders. These changes will certainly improve the ability of researchers to tease out which factors tap more directly into such issues as physical impairment, as well as create greater uniformity of measures that will permit direct comparisons between studies.",
keywords = "Function, Nonoperative care, Physical impairment, Quantification, Spinal disorders",
author = "Lettie Flores and Gatchel, {Robert Joseph} and Polatin, {Peter B.}",
year = "1997",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-199707150-00020",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "1622--1633",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "14",

}

Flores, L, Gatchel, RJ & Polatin, PB 1997, 'Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care', Spine, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 1622-1633. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199707150-00020

Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care. / Flores, Lettie; Gatchel, Robert Joseph; Polatin, Peter B.

In: Spine, Vol. 22, No. 14, 15.07.1997, p. 1622-1633.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objectification of functional improvement after nonoperative care

AU - Flores, Lettie

AU - Gatchel, Robert Joseph

AU - Polatin, Peter B.

PY - 1997/7/15

Y1 - 1997/7/15

N2 - Study Design. In this article, the authors review the three broad categories of measures that have been used to objectify functional improvement after nonoperative care of painful spinal disorder patients - physical, psychological, and socioeconomic. For each of the three categories, the major measures used are discussed, as well as research relating to the efficacy of the measures. Objectives. To point out the many differences that still exist among research studies regarding which functional outcome measures to use and when to use them. Summary of Background Data. During the past few decades, it has been made abundantly clear that painful spinal disorders, particularly when associated with work disability and/or financial benefits, result from a complex interaction of medical, psychological, and social factors. This has resulted in frequent confusion regarding what constitutes the primary roots of the disabling process. Currently, a more comprehensive biopsychosocial perspective of chronic pain and disability has emerged that has significant implications for diagnostic and treatment philosophies of practitioners. Methods. Identifying the measures frequently used to address the important biopsychosocial factors, and evaluating their relative benefits and drawbacks. Results and Conclusions. It is demonstrated that there has been an overall trend in recent years toward using more objective, quantifiable instruments, encompassing the physical, psychological, and socioeconomic parameters of outcomes research in painful spinal disorders. These changes will certainly improve the ability of researchers to tease out which factors tap more directly into such issues as physical impairment, as well as create greater uniformity of measures that will permit direct comparisons between studies.

AB - Study Design. In this article, the authors review the three broad categories of measures that have been used to objectify functional improvement after nonoperative care of painful spinal disorder patients - physical, psychological, and socioeconomic. For each of the three categories, the major measures used are discussed, as well as research relating to the efficacy of the measures. Objectives. To point out the many differences that still exist among research studies regarding which functional outcome measures to use and when to use them. Summary of Background Data. During the past few decades, it has been made abundantly clear that painful spinal disorders, particularly when associated with work disability and/or financial benefits, result from a complex interaction of medical, psychological, and social factors. This has resulted in frequent confusion regarding what constitutes the primary roots of the disabling process. Currently, a more comprehensive biopsychosocial perspective of chronic pain and disability has emerged that has significant implications for diagnostic and treatment philosophies of practitioners. Methods. Identifying the measures frequently used to address the important biopsychosocial factors, and evaluating their relative benefits and drawbacks. Results and Conclusions. It is demonstrated that there has been an overall trend in recent years toward using more objective, quantifiable instruments, encompassing the physical, psychological, and socioeconomic parameters of outcomes research in painful spinal disorders. These changes will certainly improve the ability of researchers to tease out which factors tap more directly into such issues as physical impairment, as well as create greater uniformity of measures that will permit direct comparisons between studies.

KW - Function

KW - Nonoperative care

KW - Physical impairment

KW - Quantification

KW - Spinal disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031426769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-199707150-00020

DO - 10.1097/00007632-199707150-00020

M3 - Article

C2 - 9253099

AN - SCOPUS:0031426769

VL - 22

SP - 1622

EP - 1633

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 14

ER -