Mutations in names: Implications for assessing identity by descent form historical records

K. M. Weiss, R. Chakraborty, A. V. Buchanan, R. J. Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The method of assessing mating and inbreeding patterns by use of the frequency of isonymous marriages in sets of historical data on vital events rests on several key assumptions. Two of these are monophyletism of surname origin and an absence of immigration. Another, however, is that names can correctly be assessed as to their identity and nonidentity. Various types of problems with historical data, which amount to mutations in names, can lead to difficulties in this regard. Spelling variations in names may or may not indicate differences of name origins. Aggregating names into equivalence classes based on spelling or phonetics may produce inflated isonymy by associating names which are truly of different historical origins; on the other hand, separating such names may deflate isonymy falsely by treating as different names which are actually the same, historically. These problems are not trivial in dealing with the kinds of data on which isonymy studies are usually based. Under some simplifying assumptions it is shown that mutations in surnames produce biases in estimates of the random as well as nonrandom component of inbreeding which may be rather large unless mutations in names are infrequent. Studies of isonymy should be much more sensitive to these problems if their estimates are to be taken as accurate reflections of mating structure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-322
Number of pages10
JournalHuman Biology
Volume55
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1 Jan 1983

Fingerprint

historical record
Names
mutation
inbreeding
Mutation
marriage
immigration
Inbreeding
Phonetics
Emigration and Immigration
methodology
Marriage

Cite this

Weiss, K. M., Chakraborty, R., Buchanan, A. V., & Schwartz, R. J. (1983). Mutations in names: Implications for assessing identity by descent form historical records. Human Biology, 55(2), 313-322.
Weiss, K. M. ; Chakraborty, R. ; Buchanan, A. V. ; Schwartz, R. J. / Mutations in names : Implications for assessing identity by descent form historical records. In: Human Biology. 1983 ; Vol. 55, No. 2. pp. 313-322.
@article{2e6b3145494340bdbf651101fbcef0a2,
title = "Mutations in names: Implications for assessing identity by descent form historical records",
abstract = "The method of assessing mating and inbreeding patterns by use of the frequency of isonymous marriages in sets of historical data on vital events rests on several key assumptions. Two of these are monophyletism of surname origin and an absence of immigration. Another, however, is that names can correctly be assessed as to their identity and nonidentity. Various types of problems with historical data, which amount to mutations in names, can lead to difficulties in this regard. Spelling variations in names may or may not indicate differences of name origins. Aggregating names into equivalence classes based on spelling or phonetics may produce inflated isonymy by associating names which are truly of different historical origins; on the other hand, separating such names may deflate isonymy falsely by treating as different names which are actually the same, historically. These problems are not trivial in dealing with the kinds of data on which isonymy studies are usually based. Under some simplifying assumptions it is shown that mutations in surnames produce biases in estimates of the random as well as nonrandom component of inbreeding which may be rather large unless mutations in names are infrequent. Studies of isonymy should be much more sensitive to these problems if their estimates are to be taken as accurate reflections of mating structure.",
author = "Weiss, {K. M.} and R. Chakraborty and Buchanan, {A. V.} and Schwartz, {R. J.}",
year = "1983",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "313--322",
journal = "Human Biology",
issn = "0018-7143",
publisher = "Wayne State University Press",
number = "2",

}

Weiss, KM, Chakraborty, R, Buchanan, AV & Schwartz, RJ 1983, 'Mutations in names: Implications for assessing identity by descent form historical records', Human Biology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 313-322.

Mutations in names : Implications for assessing identity by descent form historical records. / Weiss, K. M.; Chakraborty, R.; Buchanan, A. V.; Schwartz, R. J.

In: Human Biology, Vol. 55, No. 2, 01.01.1983, p. 313-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mutations in names

T2 - Implications for assessing identity by descent form historical records

AU - Weiss, K. M.

AU - Chakraborty, R.

AU - Buchanan, A. V.

AU - Schwartz, R. J.

PY - 1983/1/1

Y1 - 1983/1/1

N2 - The method of assessing mating and inbreeding patterns by use of the frequency of isonymous marriages in sets of historical data on vital events rests on several key assumptions. Two of these are monophyletism of surname origin and an absence of immigration. Another, however, is that names can correctly be assessed as to their identity and nonidentity. Various types of problems with historical data, which amount to mutations in names, can lead to difficulties in this regard. Spelling variations in names may or may not indicate differences of name origins. Aggregating names into equivalence classes based on spelling or phonetics may produce inflated isonymy by associating names which are truly of different historical origins; on the other hand, separating such names may deflate isonymy falsely by treating as different names which are actually the same, historically. These problems are not trivial in dealing with the kinds of data on which isonymy studies are usually based. Under some simplifying assumptions it is shown that mutations in surnames produce biases in estimates of the random as well as nonrandom component of inbreeding which may be rather large unless mutations in names are infrequent. Studies of isonymy should be much more sensitive to these problems if their estimates are to be taken as accurate reflections of mating structure.

AB - The method of assessing mating and inbreeding patterns by use of the frequency of isonymous marriages in sets of historical data on vital events rests on several key assumptions. Two of these are monophyletism of surname origin and an absence of immigration. Another, however, is that names can correctly be assessed as to their identity and nonidentity. Various types of problems with historical data, which amount to mutations in names, can lead to difficulties in this regard. Spelling variations in names may or may not indicate differences of name origins. Aggregating names into equivalence classes based on spelling or phonetics may produce inflated isonymy by associating names which are truly of different historical origins; on the other hand, separating such names may deflate isonymy falsely by treating as different names which are actually the same, historically. These problems are not trivial in dealing with the kinds of data on which isonymy studies are usually based. Under some simplifying assumptions it is shown that mutations in surnames produce biases in estimates of the random as well as nonrandom component of inbreeding which may be rather large unless mutations in names are infrequent. Studies of isonymy should be much more sensitive to these problems if their estimates are to be taken as accurate reflections of mating structure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020594415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6873917

AN - SCOPUS:0020594415

VL - 55

SP - 313

EP - 322

JO - Human Biology

JF - Human Biology

SN - 0018-7143

IS - 2

ER -

Weiss KM, Chakraborty R, Buchanan AV, Schwartz RJ. Mutations in names: Implications for assessing identity by descent form historical records. Human Biology. 1983 Jan 1;55(2):313-322.