Lead abatement training for underserved populations

Lessons learned

David Sterling, Roger D. Lewis, Fernando Serrano, Kwesi Dugbatey, R. Gregory Evans, Linda S. Sterling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An environmental-justice (equity) grant program was used to make accessible an existing lead-training programto minority persons and residents of low-income communities. The purpose of the program was to enhance the knowledge base within the communities concerning lead hazards and intervention strategies and expand possibilities for employment in the lead abatement industry. Barriers to attendance were anticipated and addressed, and included transportation, meals, license application fees, reminders of course date and location, and day care. The program was evaluated through measures of recruitment rates, pre and posttesting scores, and change in perception of confidence at pre-test, post-test, and at four-month follow-up. Fee-paying registrants over the same time period were used as a comparison group. First day attendance rates for individuals recruited into the equity-grant was 59 percent, of these 94 percent completed all days. Equity and fee-paying groups had similar scores on the pre-test (p = 209), while mean scores on the final exam differed significantly (p < .001) between the groups and were 77 percent and 85 percent, respectively. After adjusting for demographic and course type attended, perceptions of self-efficacy (benefit) and outcome effectiveness (confidence) increased significantly from preto post-tests for both groups and remained at post-course levels at four months follow-up. Lessons learned include: (1) Lead abatement and other related activities can be successfully taught through traditional training methods; (2) A necessary element for delivery of educational services to minority groups is forming workable ties with local community groups, but eligibility requirements must be maintained; (3) Once barriers to first-day attendance are overcome, the information necessary to perform specific work skills can be taught; (4) Positive changes in belief are not dependent on minority status, income, or education levels; (5) Training and education increased confidence in ability to perform learned skills, and belief that there will be a beneficial outcome when performed for themselves, their families, and communities; and, (6) A consensus regarding applicability of regulations must be achieved among federal, state, and local communities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-227
Number of pages11
JournalApplied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2000

Fingerprint

Vulnerable Populations
Fees and Charges
Organized Financing
Education
Minority Groups
Aptitude
Knowledge Bases
Social Justice
Self Efficacy
Licensure
Meals
Consensus
Industry
Demography
Lead

Keywords

  • Environmental Justice
  • Lead
  • Outcome Effectiveness
  • Self-Efficacy
  • Training-Evaluation

Cite this

Sterling, David ; Lewis, Roger D. ; Serrano, Fernando ; Dugbatey, Kwesi ; Gregory Evans, R. ; Sterling, Linda S. / Lead abatement training for underserved populations : Lessons learned. In: Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2000 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 217-227.
@article{9866176e5a5a4edb8d01c4929ba4b39b,
title = "Lead abatement training for underserved populations: Lessons learned",
abstract = "An environmental-justice (equity) grant program was used to make accessible an existing lead-training programto minority persons and residents of low-income communities. The purpose of the program was to enhance the knowledge base within the communities concerning lead hazards and intervention strategies and expand possibilities for employment in the lead abatement industry. Barriers to attendance were anticipated and addressed, and included transportation, meals, license application fees, reminders of course date and location, and day care. The program was evaluated through measures of recruitment rates, pre and posttesting scores, and change in perception of confidence at pre-test, post-test, and at four-month follow-up. Fee-paying registrants over the same time period were used as a comparison group. First day attendance rates for individuals recruited into the equity-grant was 59 percent, of these 94 percent completed all days. Equity and fee-paying groups had similar scores on the pre-test (p = 209), while mean scores on the final exam differed significantly (p < .001) between the groups and were 77 percent and 85 percent, respectively. After adjusting for demographic and course type attended, perceptions of self-efficacy (benefit) and outcome effectiveness (confidence) increased significantly from preto post-tests for both groups and remained at post-course levels at four months follow-up. Lessons learned include: (1) Lead abatement and other related activities can be successfully taught through traditional training methods; (2) A necessary element for delivery of educational services to minority groups is forming workable ties with local community groups, but eligibility requirements must be maintained; (3) Once barriers to first-day attendance are overcome, the information necessary to perform specific work skills can be taught; (4) Positive changes in belief are not dependent on minority status, income, or education levels; (5) Training and education increased confidence in ability to perform learned skills, and belief that there will be a beneficial outcome when performed for themselves, their families, and communities; and, (6) A consensus regarding applicability of regulations must be achieved among federal, state, and local communities.",
keywords = "Environmental Justice, Lead, Outcome Effectiveness, Self-Efficacy, Training-Evaluation",
author = "David Sterling and Lewis, {Roger D.} and Fernando Serrano and Kwesi Dugbatey and {Gregory Evans}, R. and Sterling, {Linda S.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/104732200301728",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "217--227",
journal = "Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene",
issn = "1047-322X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Sterling, D, Lewis, RD, Serrano, F, Dugbatey, K, Gregory Evans, R & Sterling, LS 2000, 'Lead abatement training for underserved populations: Lessons learned', Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/104732200301728

Lead abatement training for underserved populations : Lessons learned. / Sterling, David; Lewis, Roger D.; Serrano, Fernando; Dugbatey, Kwesi; Gregory Evans, R.; Sterling, Linda S.

In: Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol. 15, No. 2, 01.01.2000, p. 217-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lead abatement training for underserved populations

T2 - Lessons learned

AU - Sterling, David

AU - Lewis, Roger D.

AU - Serrano, Fernando

AU - Dugbatey, Kwesi

AU - Gregory Evans, R.

AU - Sterling, Linda S.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - An environmental-justice (equity) grant program was used to make accessible an existing lead-training programto minority persons and residents of low-income communities. The purpose of the program was to enhance the knowledge base within the communities concerning lead hazards and intervention strategies and expand possibilities for employment in the lead abatement industry. Barriers to attendance were anticipated and addressed, and included transportation, meals, license application fees, reminders of course date and location, and day care. The program was evaluated through measures of recruitment rates, pre and posttesting scores, and change in perception of confidence at pre-test, post-test, and at four-month follow-up. Fee-paying registrants over the same time period were used as a comparison group. First day attendance rates for individuals recruited into the equity-grant was 59 percent, of these 94 percent completed all days. Equity and fee-paying groups had similar scores on the pre-test (p = 209), while mean scores on the final exam differed significantly (p < .001) between the groups and were 77 percent and 85 percent, respectively. After adjusting for demographic and course type attended, perceptions of self-efficacy (benefit) and outcome effectiveness (confidence) increased significantly from preto post-tests for both groups and remained at post-course levels at four months follow-up. Lessons learned include: (1) Lead abatement and other related activities can be successfully taught through traditional training methods; (2) A necessary element for delivery of educational services to minority groups is forming workable ties with local community groups, but eligibility requirements must be maintained; (3) Once barriers to first-day attendance are overcome, the information necessary to perform specific work skills can be taught; (4) Positive changes in belief are not dependent on minority status, income, or education levels; (5) Training and education increased confidence in ability to perform learned skills, and belief that there will be a beneficial outcome when performed for themselves, their families, and communities; and, (6) A consensus regarding applicability of regulations must be achieved among federal, state, and local communities.

AB - An environmental-justice (equity) grant program was used to make accessible an existing lead-training programto minority persons and residents of low-income communities. The purpose of the program was to enhance the knowledge base within the communities concerning lead hazards and intervention strategies and expand possibilities for employment in the lead abatement industry. Barriers to attendance were anticipated and addressed, and included transportation, meals, license application fees, reminders of course date and location, and day care. The program was evaluated through measures of recruitment rates, pre and posttesting scores, and change in perception of confidence at pre-test, post-test, and at four-month follow-up. Fee-paying registrants over the same time period were used as a comparison group. First day attendance rates for individuals recruited into the equity-grant was 59 percent, of these 94 percent completed all days. Equity and fee-paying groups had similar scores on the pre-test (p = 209), while mean scores on the final exam differed significantly (p < .001) between the groups and were 77 percent and 85 percent, respectively. After adjusting for demographic and course type attended, perceptions of self-efficacy (benefit) and outcome effectiveness (confidence) increased significantly from preto post-tests for both groups and remained at post-course levels at four months follow-up. Lessons learned include: (1) Lead abatement and other related activities can be successfully taught through traditional training methods; (2) A necessary element for delivery of educational services to minority groups is forming workable ties with local community groups, but eligibility requirements must be maintained; (3) Once barriers to first-day attendance are overcome, the information necessary to perform specific work skills can be taught; (4) Positive changes in belief are not dependent on minority status, income, or education levels; (5) Training and education increased confidence in ability to perform learned skills, and belief that there will be a beneficial outcome when performed for themselves, their families, and communities; and, (6) A consensus regarding applicability of regulations must be achieved among federal, state, and local communities.

KW - Environmental Justice

KW - Lead

KW - Outcome Effectiveness

KW - Self-Efficacy

KW - Training-Evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033970017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/104732200301728

DO - 10.1080/104732200301728

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 217

EP - 227

JO - Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

JF - Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

SN - 1047-322X

IS - 2

ER -