TY - JOUR
T1 - Intradermally-administered influenza virus vaccine is safe and immunogenic in healthy adults 18-64 years of age
AU - Gorse, Geoffrey J.
AU - Falsey, Ann R.
AU - Fling, John A.
AU - Poling, Terry L.
AU - Strout, Cynthia B.
AU - Tsang, Peter H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Sanofi Pasteur Inc., Swiftwater, PA, USA . Role of the funding source: Sanofi Pasteur Inc. designed the study, was primarily responsible for analysis and in part interpretation of the data, and participated in writing and approved submission of the article for publication.
PY - 2013/5/1
Y1 - 2013/5/1
N2 - Background: To increase vaccine acceptance, intradermal (ID) influenza vaccine (Fluzone® Intradermal, Sanofi Pasteur Inc.) may be an attractive alternative to intramuscular (IM) vaccination due to smaller needle and volume injected. Methods: A multicenter, randomized (2:1 ID vs IM vaccines) study, blinded for ID vaccine lots, was conducted among 4292 adults 18-64 years of age enrolled in October 2008. Three lots of investigational trivalent influenza vaccine containing 9. μg hemagglutinin (HA) per strain in 0.1 mL administered ID with a 30 gauge, 1.5 mm long needle were compared to standard dose vaccine (0.5 mL containing 15 μg HA/strain) given IM. Results: The post-vaccination antibody geometric mean titers (GMT) for the ID vaccine were similar to the IM vaccine (H1N1: 193.2 vs. 178.3, H3N2: 246.7 vs. 230.7, and B: 102.5 vs. 126.9). Non-inferiority was met for the ID vaccine compared to IM vaccine as assessed by antibody GMT ratios (IM/ID) for all three virus strains (H1N1: 0.92, H3N2: 0.94, and B: 1.24). Seroconversion rates were non-inferior for H1N1 and H3N2, but not for B (ID vs. IM: H1N1: 61.2% vs. 60.5%, H3N2: 75.3% vs. 74.8%, and B: 46.2% vs. 54.2%). Seroprotection (HAI titer ≥1:40) rates were similar between groups (ID vs. IM, H1N1: 91.1% vs. 91.7%, H3N2: 90.7% vs. 91.4%, and B: 87.4% vs. 89.3%). Local injection site reactions overall were more common with ID than IM vaccine (ID vs. IM: 89.2% vs. 60.2%), but were usually grade 1 or 2 and transient. The frequencies of local injection site pain and systemic reactions were similar between vaccine groups, except more myalgia with IM vaccine. Conclusions: The ID vaccine elicited immune responses comparable to IM vaccine except for the seroconversion rate to B virus. With the exception of pain, local injection site reactions were more common with the ID vaccine, but well-tolerated and of short duration. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00772109.
AB - Background: To increase vaccine acceptance, intradermal (ID) influenza vaccine (Fluzone® Intradermal, Sanofi Pasteur Inc.) may be an attractive alternative to intramuscular (IM) vaccination due to smaller needle and volume injected. Methods: A multicenter, randomized (2:1 ID vs IM vaccines) study, blinded for ID vaccine lots, was conducted among 4292 adults 18-64 years of age enrolled in October 2008. Three lots of investigational trivalent influenza vaccine containing 9. μg hemagglutinin (HA) per strain in 0.1 mL administered ID with a 30 gauge, 1.5 mm long needle were compared to standard dose vaccine (0.5 mL containing 15 μg HA/strain) given IM. Results: The post-vaccination antibody geometric mean titers (GMT) for the ID vaccine were similar to the IM vaccine (H1N1: 193.2 vs. 178.3, H3N2: 246.7 vs. 230.7, and B: 102.5 vs. 126.9). Non-inferiority was met for the ID vaccine compared to IM vaccine as assessed by antibody GMT ratios (IM/ID) for all three virus strains (H1N1: 0.92, H3N2: 0.94, and B: 1.24). Seroconversion rates were non-inferior for H1N1 and H3N2, but not for B (ID vs. IM: H1N1: 61.2% vs. 60.5%, H3N2: 75.3% vs. 74.8%, and B: 46.2% vs. 54.2%). Seroprotection (HAI titer ≥1:40) rates were similar between groups (ID vs. IM, H1N1: 91.1% vs. 91.7%, H3N2: 90.7% vs. 91.4%, and B: 87.4% vs. 89.3%). Local injection site reactions overall were more common with ID than IM vaccine (ID vs. IM: 89.2% vs. 60.2%), but were usually grade 1 or 2 and transient. The frequencies of local injection site pain and systemic reactions were similar between vaccine groups, except more myalgia with IM vaccine. Conclusions: The ID vaccine elicited immune responses comparable to IM vaccine except for the seroconversion rate to B virus. With the exception of pain, local injection site reactions were more common with the ID vaccine, but well-tolerated and of short duration. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00772109.
KW - Immune response
KW - Influenza
KW - Vaccines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876079444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.03.008
DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.03.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 23499604
AN - SCOPUS:84876079444
SN - 0264-410X
VL - 31
SP - 2358
EP - 2365
JO - Vaccine
JF - Vaccine
IS - 19
ER -