Exploring college students’ sexual and reproductive health literacy

Cheryl A. Vamos, Erika L. Thompson, Rachel G. Logan, Stacey B. Griner, Karen M. Perrin, Laura K. Merrell, Ellen M. Daley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To assess college students’ sexual and reproductive health (SRH) literacy experiences, specific to contraception use and STI prevention. Participants: In Spring 2015, participants (n = 43) from a large institution participated in six focus groups (two male and four females groups). Methods: Focus groups were guided by the health literacy domains (access; understand; appraise; apply); data were analyzed in MaxQDA using the constant comparative method. Results: The Internet was the most commonly accessed source for SRH information. Participants discussed facilitators (eg, use of visuals) and barriers (eg, medical jargon) to understanding information; and personal lifestyle, advice from family/friends, symptoms, and sexual partners as appraisal factors. Participants applied information by communicating with friends/providers and seeking healthcare. However, findings were not linear nor mutually exclusive, representing the interaction of health literacy skills. Conclusion: Findings suggest that a patient-centered intervention capitalizing on technology and trusted individuals (providers/peer educators) may facilitate college students’ SRH literacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)79-88
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of American College Health
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
Reproductive Health
Students
Focus Groups
Sexual Partners
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Contraception
Health Personnel
Internet
Life Style
Technology

Keywords

  • Community health
  • counseling
  • health education

Cite this

Vamos, Cheryl A. ; Thompson, Erika L. ; Logan, Rachel G. ; Griner, Stacey B. ; Perrin, Karen M. ; Merrell, Laura K. ; Daley, Ellen M. / Exploring college students’ sexual and reproductive health literacy. In: Journal of American College Health. 2020 ; Vol. 68, No. 1. pp. 79-88.
@article{48c78e1523ac4da7a69cabd02941ef44,
title = "Exploring college students’ sexual and reproductive health literacy",
abstract = "Objective: To assess college students’ sexual and reproductive health (SRH) literacy experiences, specific to contraception use and STI prevention. Participants: In Spring 2015, participants (n = 43) from a large institution participated in six focus groups (two male and four females groups). Methods: Focus groups were guided by the health literacy domains (access; understand; appraise; apply); data were analyzed in MaxQDA using the constant comparative method. Results: The Internet was the most commonly accessed source for SRH information. Participants discussed facilitators (eg, use of visuals) and barriers (eg, medical jargon) to understanding information; and personal lifestyle, advice from family/friends, symptoms, and sexual partners as appraisal factors. Participants applied information by communicating with friends/providers and seeking healthcare. However, findings were not linear nor mutually exclusive, representing the interaction of health literacy skills. Conclusion: Findings suggest that a patient-centered intervention capitalizing on technology and trusted individuals (providers/peer educators) may facilitate college students’ SRH literacy.",
keywords = "Community health, counseling, health education",
author = "Vamos, {Cheryl A.} and Thompson, {Erika L.} and Logan, {Rachel G.} and Griner, {Stacey B.} and Perrin, {Karen M.} and Merrell, {Laura K.} and Daley, {Ellen M.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/07448481.2018.1515757",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "79--88",
journal = "Journal of American College Health",
issn = "0744-8481",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Exploring college students’ sexual and reproductive health literacy. / Vamos, Cheryl A.; Thompson, Erika L.; Logan, Rachel G.; Griner, Stacey B.; Perrin, Karen M.; Merrell, Laura K.; Daley, Ellen M.

In: Journal of American College Health, Vol. 68, No. 1, 02.01.2020, p. 79-88.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring college students’ sexual and reproductive health literacy

AU - Vamos, Cheryl A.

AU - Thompson, Erika L.

AU - Logan, Rachel G.

AU - Griner, Stacey B.

AU - Perrin, Karen M.

AU - Merrell, Laura K.

AU - Daley, Ellen M.

PY - 2020/1/2

Y1 - 2020/1/2

N2 - Objective: To assess college students’ sexual and reproductive health (SRH) literacy experiences, specific to contraception use and STI prevention. Participants: In Spring 2015, participants (n = 43) from a large institution participated in six focus groups (two male and four females groups). Methods: Focus groups were guided by the health literacy domains (access; understand; appraise; apply); data were analyzed in MaxQDA using the constant comparative method. Results: The Internet was the most commonly accessed source for SRH information. Participants discussed facilitators (eg, use of visuals) and barriers (eg, medical jargon) to understanding information; and personal lifestyle, advice from family/friends, symptoms, and sexual partners as appraisal factors. Participants applied information by communicating with friends/providers and seeking healthcare. However, findings were not linear nor mutually exclusive, representing the interaction of health literacy skills. Conclusion: Findings suggest that a patient-centered intervention capitalizing on technology and trusted individuals (providers/peer educators) may facilitate college students’ SRH literacy.

AB - Objective: To assess college students’ sexual and reproductive health (SRH) literacy experiences, specific to contraception use and STI prevention. Participants: In Spring 2015, participants (n = 43) from a large institution participated in six focus groups (two male and four females groups). Methods: Focus groups were guided by the health literacy domains (access; understand; appraise; apply); data were analyzed in MaxQDA using the constant comparative method. Results: The Internet was the most commonly accessed source for SRH information. Participants discussed facilitators (eg, use of visuals) and barriers (eg, medical jargon) to understanding information; and personal lifestyle, advice from family/friends, symptoms, and sexual partners as appraisal factors. Participants applied information by communicating with friends/providers and seeking healthcare. However, findings were not linear nor mutually exclusive, representing the interaction of health literacy skills. Conclusion: Findings suggest that a patient-centered intervention capitalizing on technology and trusted individuals (providers/peer educators) may facilitate college students’ SRH literacy.

KW - Community health

KW - counseling

KW - health education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056101220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07448481.2018.1515757

DO - 10.1080/07448481.2018.1515757

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056101220

VL - 68

SP - 79

EP - 88

JO - Journal of American College Health

JF - Journal of American College Health

SN - 0744-8481

IS - 1

ER -