Exploratory study of community pharmacists' perceptions about new or transferred prescription incentives

Marc Labaron Fleming, Poorva Nemlekar, Carolyn M. Brown, Roxanne Cantu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To assess community pharmacists' perceptions of new or transferred prescription incentives on quality of care, pharmacy practice (e.g., workload), and patient base. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Texas from March through August 2010. Participants: Texas community pharmacists. Intervention: In-person and online surveys. Main outcome measure: Pharmacists' perceptions of the impact of new or transferred prescription incentives on pharmacy practice and patient care. Results: 74 usable surveys were analyzed. Most pharmacists (74%) worked for employers who participated in prescription incentive promotions (e.g., $10 gift cards). Regarding quality of care, pharmacists perceived patients as being less likely to receive thorough drug interaction screenings (4.0 ± 1.4 [mean ± SD]) and reported medication-related problems "sometimes to very often" (3.0 ± 0.9) as a result of transferring prescriptions. Pharmacists also reported that patients commonly fill prescriptions regardless of medical necessity in order to receive incentives (4.1 ± 1.0). With respect to pharmacy practice, the majority believed that prescription incentives devalue the profession (4.3 ± 1.1) and should be eliminated (4.4 ± 1.0). Pharmacists were not inclined to believe that incentives were effective in attracting new patients and retaining their business (2.0 ± 1.0). Conclusion: Pharmacists believed that prescription incentives are ineffective tools for increasing patient base and may lead to lower quality of care for patients. Pharmacists view prescription incentives as devaluing the profession of pharmacy and exposing patients to medication-related problems.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of the American Pharmacists Association
Volume52
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Pharmacists
Prescriptions
Motivation
Drug interactions
Screening
Quality of Health Care
Industry
Gift Giving
Preclinical Drug Evaluations
Workload
Drug Interactions
Patient Care
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Incentives
  • Medication errors
  • Pharmacists
  • Quality of care

Cite this

@article{4e09f64017f1474cb2624e989e336540,
title = "Exploratory study of community pharmacists' perceptions about new or transferred prescription incentives",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess community pharmacists' perceptions of new or transferred prescription incentives on quality of care, pharmacy practice (e.g., workload), and patient base. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Texas from March through August 2010. Participants: Texas community pharmacists. Intervention: In-person and online surveys. Main outcome measure: Pharmacists' perceptions of the impact of new or transferred prescription incentives on pharmacy practice and patient care. Results: 74 usable surveys were analyzed. Most pharmacists (74{\%}) worked for employers who participated in prescription incentive promotions (e.g., $10 gift cards). Regarding quality of care, pharmacists perceived patients as being less likely to receive thorough drug interaction screenings (4.0 ± 1.4 [mean ± SD]) and reported medication-related problems {"}sometimes to very often{"} (3.0 ± 0.9) as a result of transferring prescriptions. Pharmacists also reported that patients commonly fill prescriptions regardless of medical necessity in order to receive incentives (4.1 ± 1.0). With respect to pharmacy practice, the majority believed that prescription incentives devalue the profession (4.3 ± 1.1) and should be eliminated (4.4 ± 1.0). Pharmacists were not inclined to believe that incentives were effective in attracting new patients and retaining their business (2.0 ± 1.0). Conclusion: Pharmacists believed that prescription incentives are ineffective tools for increasing patient base and may lead to lower quality of care for patients. Pharmacists view prescription incentives as devaluing the profession of pharmacy and exposing patients to medication-related problems.",
keywords = "Incentives, Medication errors, Pharmacists, Quality of care",
author = "Fleming, {Marc Labaron} and Poorva Nemlekar and Brown, {Carolyn M.} and Roxanne Cantu",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1331/JAPhA.2012.11096",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
journal = "Journal of the American Pharmacists Association",
issn = "1544-3191",
publisher = "American Pharmacists Association",
number = "5",

}

Exploratory study of community pharmacists' perceptions about new or transferred prescription incentives. / Fleming, Marc Labaron; Nemlekar, Poorva; Brown, Carolyn M.; Cantu, Roxanne.

In: Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, Vol. 52, No. 5, 01.01.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploratory study of community pharmacists' perceptions about new or transferred prescription incentives

AU - Fleming, Marc Labaron

AU - Nemlekar, Poorva

AU - Brown, Carolyn M.

AU - Cantu, Roxanne

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Objectives: To assess community pharmacists' perceptions of new or transferred prescription incentives on quality of care, pharmacy practice (e.g., workload), and patient base. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Texas from March through August 2010. Participants: Texas community pharmacists. Intervention: In-person and online surveys. Main outcome measure: Pharmacists' perceptions of the impact of new or transferred prescription incentives on pharmacy practice and patient care. Results: 74 usable surveys were analyzed. Most pharmacists (74%) worked for employers who participated in prescription incentive promotions (e.g., $10 gift cards). Regarding quality of care, pharmacists perceived patients as being less likely to receive thorough drug interaction screenings (4.0 ± 1.4 [mean ± SD]) and reported medication-related problems "sometimes to very often" (3.0 ± 0.9) as a result of transferring prescriptions. Pharmacists also reported that patients commonly fill prescriptions regardless of medical necessity in order to receive incentives (4.1 ± 1.0). With respect to pharmacy practice, the majority believed that prescription incentives devalue the profession (4.3 ± 1.1) and should be eliminated (4.4 ± 1.0). Pharmacists were not inclined to believe that incentives were effective in attracting new patients and retaining their business (2.0 ± 1.0). Conclusion: Pharmacists believed that prescription incentives are ineffective tools for increasing patient base and may lead to lower quality of care for patients. Pharmacists view prescription incentives as devaluing the profession of pharmacy and exposing patients to medication-related problems.

AB - Objectives: To assess community pharmacists' perceptions of new or transferred prescription incentives on quality of care, pharmacy practice (e.g., workload), and patient base. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Texas from March through August 2010. Participants: Texas community pharmacists. Intervention: In-person and online surveys. Main outcome measure: Pharmacists' perceptions of the impact of new or transferred prescription incentives on pharmacy practice and patient care. Results: 74 usable surveys were analyzed. Most pharmacists (74%) worked for employers who participated in prescription incentive promotions (e.g., $10 gift cards). Regarding quality of care, pharmacists perceived patients as being less likely to receive thorough drug interaction screenings (4.0 ± 1.4 [mean ± SD]) and reported medication-related problems "sometimes to very often" (3.0 ± 0.9) as a result of transferring prescriptions. Pharmacists also reported that patients commonly fill prescriptions regardless of medical necessity in order to receive incentives (4.1 ± 1.0). With respect to pharmacy practice, the majority believed that prescription incentives devalue the profession (4.3 ± 1.1) and should be eliminated (4.4 ± 1.0). Pharmacists were not inclined to believe that incentives were effective in attracting new patients and retaining their business (2.0 ± 1.0). Conclusion: Pharmacists believed that prescription incentives are ineffective tools for increasing patient base and may lead to lower quality of care for patients. Pharmacists view prescription incentives as devaluing the profession of pharmacy and exposing patients to medication-related problems.

KW - Incentives

KW - Medication errors

KW - Pharmacists

KW - Quality of care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874437012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.11096

DO - 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.11096

M3 - Article

C2 - 23023859

AN - SCOPUS:84874437012

VL - 52

JO - Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

JF - Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

SN - 1544-3191

IS - 5

ER -