Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion

Robert Gunzburg, Marek Szpalski, Stuart A. Callary, Christopher J. Colloca, Victor Kosmopoulos, Deed Harrison, Robert J. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interspinous devices have been introduced to provide a minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis or foraminal stenosis. Little is known however, of the effect of interspinous devices on intersegmental range of motion (ROM). The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate the effect of a novel minimally invasive interspinous implant, InSwing®, on sagittal plane ROM of the lumbar spine using an ovine model. Ten adolescent Merino lambs underwent a destabilization procedure at the L1-L2 level simulating a stenotic degenerative spondylolisthesis (as described in our earlier work; Spine 15:571-576, 1990). All animals were placed in a side-lying posture and lateral radiographs were taken in full flexion and extension of the trunk in a standardized manner. Radiographs were repeated following the insertion of an 8-mm InSwing® interspinous device at L1-L2, and again with the implant secured by means of a tension band tightened to 1 N/m around the L1 and L2 spinous processes. ROM was assessed in each of the three conditions and compared using Cobb's method. A paired t-test compared ROM for each of the experimental conditions (P < 0.05). After instrumentation with the InSwing® interspinous implant, the mean total sagittal ROM (from full extension to full flexion) was reduced by 16% from 6.3° to 5.3 ± 2.7°. The addition of the tension band resulted in a 43% reduction in total sagittal ROM to 3.6 ± 1.9° which approached significance. When looking at flexion only, the addition of the interspinous implant without the tension band did not significantly reduce lumbar flexion, however, a statistically significant 15% reduction in lumbar flexion was observed with the addition of the tension band (P = 0.01). To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study radiographically showing the advantage of using an interspinous device to stabilize the spine in flexion. These results are important findings particularly for patients with clinical symptoms related to instable degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)696-703
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2009

Fingerprint

Articular Range of Motion
Spondylolisthesis
Equipment and Supplies
Spine
Spinal Stenosis
Posture
Sheep
Pathologic Constriction

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Interspinous implant
  • Kinematics
  • Lumbar spine
  • Spondylolisthesis

Cite this

Gunzburg, R., Szpalski, M., Callary, S. A., Colloca, C. J., Kosmopoulos, V., Harrison, D., & Moore, R. J. (2009). Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion. European Spine Journal, 18(5), 696-703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0890-3
Gunzburg, Robert ; Szpalski, Marek ; Callary, Stuart A. ; Colloca, Christopher J. ; Kosmopoulos, Victor ; Harrison, Deed ; Moore, Robert J. / Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion. In: European Spine Journal. 2009 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 696-703.
@article{5118cc9c288b45e38952a58dde0dbd52,
title = "Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion",
abstract = "Interspinous devices have been introduced to provide a minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis or foraminal stenosis. Little is known however, of the effect of interspinous devices on intersegmental range of motion (ROM). The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate the effect of a novel minimally invasive interspinous implant, InSwing{\circledR}, on sagittal plane ROM of the lumbar spine using an ovine model. Ten adolescent Merino lambs underwent a destabilization procedure at the L1-L2 level simulating a stenotic degenerative spondylolisthesis (as described in our earlier work; Spine 15:571-576, 1990). All animals were placed in a side-lying posture and lateral radiographs were taken in full flexion and extension of the trunk in a standardized manner. Radiographs were repeated following the insertion of an 8-mm InSwing{\circledR} interspinous device at L1-L2, and again with the implant secured by means of a tension band tightened to 1 N/m around the L1 and L2 spinous processes. ROM was assessed in each of the three conditions and compared using Cobb's method. A paired t-test compared ROM for each of the experimental conditions (P < 0.05). After instrumentation with the InSwing{\circledR} interspinous implant, the mean total sagittal ROM (from full extension to full flexion) was reduced by 16{\%} from 6.3° to 5.3 ± 2.7°. The addition of the tension band resulted in a 43{\%} reduction in total sagittal ROM to 3.6 ± 1.9° which approached significance. When looking at flexion only, the addition of the interspinous implant without the tension band did not significantly reduce lumbar flexion, however, a statistically significant 15{\%} reduction in lumbar flexion was observed with the addition of the tension band (P = 0.01). To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study radiographically showing the advantage of using an interspinous device to stabilize the spine in flexion. These results are important findings particularly for patients with clinical symptoms related to instable degenerative spondylolisthesis.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Interspinous implant, Kinematics, Lumbar spine, Spondylolisthesis",
author = "Robert Gunzburg and Marek Szpalski and Callary, {Stuart A.} and Colloca, {Christopher J.} and Victor Kosmopoulos and Deed Harrison and Moore, {Robert J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-009-0890-3",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "696--703",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

Gunzburg, R, Szpalski, M, Callary, SA, Colloca, CJ, Kosmopoulos, V, Harrison, D & Moore, RJ 2009, 'Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion', European Spine Journal, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 696-703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0890-3

Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion. / Gunzburg, Robert; Szpalski, Marek; Callary, Stuart A.; Colloca, Christopher J.; Kosmopoulos, Victor; Harrison, Deed; Moore, Robert J.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 18, No. 5, 01.05.2009, p. 696-703.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion

AU - Gunzburg, Robert

AU - Szpalski, Marek

AU - Callary, Stuart A.

AU - Colloca, Christopher J.

AU - Kosmopoulos, Victor

AU - Harrison, Deed

AU - Moore, Robert J.

PY - 2009/5/1

Y1 - 2009/5/1

N2 - Interspinous devices have been introduced to provide a minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis or foraminal stenosis. Little is known however, of the effect of interspinous devices on intersegmental range of motion (ROM). The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate the effect of a novel minimally invasive interspinous implant, InSwing®, on sagittal plane ROM of the lumbar spine using an ovine model. Ten adolescent Merino lambs underwent a destabilization procedure at the L1-L2 level simulating a stenotic degenerative spondylolisthesis (as described in our earlier work; Spine 15:571-576, 1990). All animals were placed in a side-lying posture and lateral radiographs were taken in full flexion and extension of the trunk in a standardized manner. Radiographs were repeated following the insertion of an 8-mm InSwing® interspinous device at L1-L2, and again with the implant secured by means of a tension band tightened to 1 N/m around the L1 and L2 spinous processes. ROM was assessed in each of the three conditions and compared using Cobb's method. A paired t-test compared ROM for each of the experimental conditions (P < 0.05). After instrumentation with the InSwing® interspinous implant, the mean total sagittal ROM (from full extension to full flexion) was reduced by 16% from 6.3° to 5.3 ± 2.7°. The addition of the tension band resulted in a 43% reduction in total sagittal ROM to 3.6 ± 1.9° which approached significance. When looking at flexion only, the addition of the interspinous implant without the tension band did not significantly reduce lumbar flexion, however, a statistically significant 15% reduction in lumbar flexion was observed with the addition of the tension band (P = 0.01). To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study radiographically showing the advantage of using an interspinous device to stabilize the spine in flexion. These results are important findings particularly for patients with clinical symptoms related to instable degenerative spondylolisthesis.

AB - Interspinous devices have been introduced to provide a minimally invasive surgical alternative for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis or foraminal stenosis. Little is known however, of the effect of interspinous devices on intersegmental range of motion (ROM). The aim of this in vivo study was to investigate the effect of a novel minimally invasive interspinous implant, InSwing®, on sagittal plane ROM of the lumbar spine using an ovine model. Ten adolescent Merino lambs underwent a destabilization procedure at the L1-L2 level simulating a stenotic degenerative spondylolisthesis (as described in our earlier work; Spine 15:571-576, 1990). All animals were placed in a side-lying posture and lateral radiographs were taken in full flexion and extension of the trunk in a standardized manner. Radiographs were repeated following the insertion of an 8-mm InSwing® interspinous device at L1-L2, and again with the implant secured by means of a tension band tightened to 1 N/m around the L1 and L2 spinous processes. ROM was assessed in each of the three conditions and compared using Cobb's method. A paired t-test compared ROM for each of the experimental conditions (P < 0.05). After instrumentation with the InSwing® interspinous implant, the mean total sagittal ROM (from full extension to full flexion) was reduced by 16% from 6.3° to 5.3 ± 2.7°. The addition of the tension band resulted in a 43% reduction in total sagittal ROM to 3.6 ± 1.9° which approached significance. When looking at flexion only, the addition of the interspinous implant without the tension band did not significantly reduce lumbar flexion, however, a statistically significant 15% reduction in lumbar flexion was observed with the addition of the tension band (P = 0.01). To our knowledge, this is the first in vivo study radiographically showing the advantage of using an interspinous device to stabilize the spine in flexion. These results are important findings particularly for patients with clinical symptoms related to instable degenerative spondylolisthesis.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Interspinous implant

KW - Kinematics

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Spondylolisthesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349218412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-009-0890-3

DO - 10.1007/s00586-009-0890-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 19198894

AN - SCOPUS:67349218412

VL - 18

SP - 696

EP - 703

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

IS - 5

ER -

Gunzburg R, Szpalski M, Callary SA, Colloca CJ, Kosmopoulos V, Harrison D et al. Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion. European Spine Journal. 2009 May 1;18(5):696-703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0890-3