Does the primate pattern hold up? Testing the functional significance of infraorbital foramen size variation among marsupials

Amanda N. Spriggs, Magdalena Natalia Muchlinski, Adam D. Gordon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives The relative size of the infraorbital foramen (IOF) has been used to infer the ecology of extinct primates for several decades. Primates have relatively smaller IOFs than most other mammals, which may result from the fact that they pre-process and manipulate food with their hands rather than their muzzles. In primates, relative IOF area co-varies with diet, where insectivores and folivores have relatively smaller IOFs than frugivores. We wanted to determine whether the observed patterns associated with IOF variation hold across other orders. Materials and Methods We examined how relative IOF area differs among marsupials occupying different ecological niches. Marsupials were chosen because they converge with primates in both ecology and morphology, but unlike primates, some marsupials approach and pre-process foods only with their muzzles. We measured IOF area and cranial lengths from 72 marsupial species, and behavioral feeding data were obtained from a subset of this sample (N = 20). Results Relative IOF area did not vary significantly between substrate preferences. However, relative IOF area differed significantly by diet category (P < 0.001). Species that specialize in feeding on non-grassy leaves have significantly smaller relative IOF areas than species which primarily feed on grasses, insects, vertebrates, or some combination thereof. Behavioral analyses support that folivorous marsupials approach and remove food with the hands more often than marsupials from other dietary groups. Discussion Results suggest that relatively small IOF area may reflect increased reliance on the hands while feeding, and that relative IOF size can be used as an indicator of feeding behavior.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-40
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume160
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2016

Fingerprint

Marsupialia
Primates
Hand
Ecology
Food
food
ecology
Diet
Feeding Behavior
Poaceae
Insects
Vertebrates
Mammals

Keywords

  • diet
  • feeding behavior
  • functional morphology
  • infraorbital nerve
  • substrate

Cite this

@article{36faaac1ea6b4746990f392ec53861c9,
title = "Does the primate pattern hold up? Testing the functional significance of infraorbital foramen size variation among marsupials",
abstract = "Objectives The relative size of the infraorbital foramen (IOF) has been used to infer the ecology of extinct primates for several decades. Primates have relatively smaller IOFs than most other mammals, which may result from the fact that they pre-process and manipulate food with their hands rather than their muzzles. In primates, relative IOF area co-varies with diet, where insectivores and folivores have relatively smaller IOFs than frugivores. We wanted to determine whether the observed patterns associated with IOF variation hold across other orders. Materials and Methods We examined how relative IOF area differs among marsupials occupying different ecological niches. Marsupials were chosen because they converge with primates in both ecology and morphology, but unlike primates, some marsupials approach and pre-process foods only with their muzzles. We measured IOF area and cranial lengths from 72 marsupial species, and behavioral feeding data were obtained from a subset of this sample (N = 20). Results Relative IOF area did not vary significantly between substrate preferences. However, relative IOF area differed significantly by diet category (P < 0.001). Species that specialize in feeding on non-grassy leaves have significantly smaller relative IOF areas than species which primarily feed on grasses, insects, vertebrates, or some combination thereof. Behavioral analyses support that folivorous marsupials approach and remove food with the hands more often than marsupials from other dietary groups. Discussion Results suggest that relatively small IOF area may reflect increased reliance on the hands while feeding, and that relative IOF size can be used as an indicator of feeding behavior.",
keywords = "diet, feeding behavior, functional morphology, infraorbital nerve, substrate",
author = "Spriggs, {Amanda N.} and Muchlinski, {Magdalena Natalia} and Gordon, {Adam D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajpa.22931",
language = "English",
volume = "160",
pages = "30--40",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Does the primate pattern hold up? Testing the functional significance of infraorbital foramen size variation among marsupials. / Spriggs, Amanda N.; Muchlinski, Magdalena Natalia; Gordon, Adam D.

In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 160, No. 1, 01.05.2016, p. 30-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the primate pattern hold up? Testing the functional significance of infraorbital foramen size variation among marsupials

AU - Spriggs, Amanda N.

AU - Muchlinski, Magdalena Natalia

AU - Gordon, Adam D.

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Objectives The relative size of the infraorbital foramen (IOF) has been used to infer the ecology of extinct primates for several decades. Primates have relatively smaller IOFs than most other mammals, which may result from the fact that they pre-process and manipulate food with their hands rather than their muzzles. In primates, relative IOF area co-varies with diet, where insectivores and folivores have relatively smaller IOFs than frugivores. We wanted to determine whether the observed patterns associated with IOF variation hold across other orders. Materials and Methods We examined how relative IOF area differs among marsupials occupying different ecological niches. Marsupials were chosen because they converge with primates in both ecology and morphology, but unlike primates, some marsupials approach and pre-process foods only with their muzzles. We measured IOF area and cranial lengths from 72 marsupial species, and behavioral feeding data were obtained from a subset of this sample (N = 20). Results Relative IOF area did not vary significantly between substrate preferences. However, relative IOF area differed significantly by diet category (P < 0.001). Species that specialize in feeding on non-grassy leaves have significantly smaller relative IOF areas than species which primarily feed on grasses, insects, vertebrates, or some combination thereof. Behavioral analyses support that folivorous marsupials approach and remove food with the hands more often than marsupials from other dietary groups. Discussion Results suggest that relatively small IOF area may reflect increased reliance on the hands while feeding, and that relative IOF size can be used as an indicator of feeding behavior.

AB - Objectives The relative size of the infraorbital foramen (IOF) has been used to infer the ecology of extinct primates for several decades. Primates have relatively smaller IOFs than most other mammals, which may result from the fact that they pre-process and manipulate food with their hands rather than their muzzles. In primates, relative IOF area co-varies with diet, where insectivores and folivores have relatively smaller IOFs than frugivores. We wanted to determine whether the observed patterns associated with IOF variation hold across other orders. Materials and Methods We examined how relative IOF area differs among marsupials occupying different ecological niches. Marsupials were chosen because they converge with primates in both ecology and morphology, but unlike primates, some marsupials approach and pre-process foods only with their muzzles. We measured IOF area and cranial lengths from 72 marsupial species, and behavioral feeding data were obtained from a subset of this sample (N = 20). Results Relative IOF area did not vary significantly between substrate preferences. However, relative IOF area differed significantly by diet category (P < 0.001). Species that specialize in feeding on non-grassy leaves have significantly smaller relative IOF areas than species which primarily feed on grasses, insects, vertebrates, or some combination thereof. Behavioral analyses support that folivorous marsupials approach and remove food with the hands more often than marsupials from other dietary groups. Discussion Results suggest that relatively small IOF area may reflect increased reliance on the hands while feeding, and that relative IOF size can be used as an indicator of feeding behavior.

KW - diet

KW - feeding behavior

KW - functional morphology

KW - infraorbital nerve

KW - substrate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956602836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.22931

DO - 10.1002/ajpa.22931

M3 - Article

C2 - 26805953

AN - SCOPUS:84956602836

VL - 160

SP - 30

EP - 40

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 1

ER -