Differentiating the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test and Pearson's χ2 Test

Location and Dispersion

Zhengyang Zhou, Hung Chih Ku, Zhipeng Huang, Guan Xing, Chao Xing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In genetic case-control association studies, a standard practice is to perform the Cochran-Armitage (CA) trend test with 1 degree-of-freedom (d.f.) under the assumption of an additive model. However, when the true genetic model is recessive or near recessive, it is outperformed by Pearson's χ2 test with 2 d.f. In this article, we analytically reveal the statistical basis that leads to the phenomenon. First, we show that the CA trend test examines the location shift between the case and control groups, whereas Pearson's χ2 test examines both the location and dispersion shifts between the two groups. Second, we show that under the additive model, the effect of location deviation outweighs that of the dispersion deviation and vice versa under a near recessive model. Therefore, Pearson's χ2 test is a more robust test than the CA trend test, and it outperforms the latter when the mode of inheritance evolves to the recessive end.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)184-189
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Human Genetics
Volume81
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Genetic Models
Case-Control Studies
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Pearson's chi-squared test
  • dispersion
  • location
  • trend test

Cite this

Zhou, Zhengyang ; Ku, Hung Chih ; Huang, Zhipeng ; Xing, Guan ; Xing, Chao. / Differentiating the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test and Pearson's χ2 Test : Location and Dispersion. In: Annals of Human Genetics. 2017 ; Vol. 81, No. 5. pp. 184-189.
@article{5e1e36ecd6644499b4d49be1c47360d0,
title = "Differentiating the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test and Pearson's χ2 Test: Location and Dispersion",
abstract = "In genetic case-control association studies, a standard practice is to perform the Cochran-Armitage (CA) trend test with 1 degree-of-freedom (d.f.) under the assumption of an additive model. However, when the true genetic model is recessive or near recessive, it is outperformed by Pearson's χ2 test with 2 d.f. In this article, we analytically reveal the statistical basis that leads to the phenomenon. First, we show that the CA trend test examines the location shift between the case and control groups, whereas Pearson's χ2 test examines both the location and dispersion shifts between the two groups. Second, we show that under the additive model, the effect of location deviation outweighs that of the dispersion deviation and vice versa under a near recessive model. Therefore, Pearson's χ2 test is a more robust test than the CA trend test, and it outperforms the latter when the mode of inheritance evolves to the recessive end.",
keywords = "Pearson's chi-squared test, dispersion, location, trend test",
author = "Zhengyang Zhou and Ku, {Hung Chih} and Zhipeng Huang and Guan Xing and Chao Xing",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ahg.12202",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "184--189",
journal = "Annals of Human Genetics",
issn = "0003-4800",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Differentiating the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test and Pearson's χ2 Test : Location and Dispersion. / Zhou, Zhengyang; Ku, Hung Chih; Huang, Zhipeng; Xing, Guan; Xing, Chao.

In: Annals of Human Genetics, Vol. 81, No. 5, 01.09.2017, p. 184-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differentiating the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test and Pearson's χ2 Test

T2 - Location and Dispersion

AU - Zhou, Zhengyang

AU - Ku, Hung Chih

AU - Huang, Zhipeng

AU - Xing, Guan

AU - Xing, Chao

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - In genetic case-control association studies, a standard practice is to perform the Cochran-Armitage (CA) trend test with 1 degree-of-freedom (d.f.) under the assumption of an additive model. However, when the true genetic model is recessive or near recessive, it is outperformed by Pearson's χ2 test with 2 d.f. In this article, we analytically reveal the statistical basis that leads to the phenomenon. First, we show that the CA trend test examines the location shift between the case and control groups, whereas Pearson's χ2 test examines both the location and dispersion shifts between the two groups. Second, we show that under the additive model, the effect of location deviation outweighs that of the dispersion deviation and vice versa under a near recessive model. Therefore, Pearson's χ2 test is a more robust test than the CA trend test, and it outperforms the latter when the mode of inheritance evolves to the recessive end.

AB - In genetic case-control association studies, a standard practice is to perform the Cochran-Armitage (CA) trend test with 1 degree-of-freedom (d.f.) under the assumption of an additive model. However, when the true genetic model is recessive or near recessive, it is outperformed by Pearson's χ2 test with 2 d.f. In this article, we analytically reveal the statistical basis that leads to the phenomenon. First, we show that the CA trend test examines the location shift between the case and control groups, whereas Pearson's χ2 test examines both the location and dispersion shifts between the two groups. Second, we show that under the additive model, the effect of location deviation outweighs that of the dispersion deviation and vice versa under a near recessive model. Therefore, Pearson's χ2 test is a more robust test than the CA trend test, and it outperforms the latter when the mode of inheritance evolves to the recessive end.

KW - Pearson's chi-squared test

KW - dispersion

KW - location

KW - trend test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027678026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ahg.12202

DO - 10.1111/ahg.12202

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 184

EP - 189

JO - Annals of Human Genetics

JF - Annals of Human Genetics

SN - 0003-4800

IS - 5

ER -