Coping motives moderate efficacy of personalized normative feedback among heavy drinking U.S. college students

Chelsie M. Young, Clayton Neighbors, Angelo M. DiBello, Carla Sharp, Michael J. Zvolensky, Melissa Ardelle Lewis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Personalized normative feedback (PNF) interventions have received empirical support, are presumed to work by reducing normative misperceptions, and have been found to be particularly efficacious for those who drink for social reasons. However, PNF interventions also offer direct comparisons between one’s own drinking and normative drinking, which may be especially important for coping drinkers. The present research evaluated whether reduced perceived norms and drinking at follow-ups varied as a function of coping motives. Method: Aims were examined as a secondary analysis of a PNF intervention study among 252 U.S. college students. Following baseline assessment, participants were randomly assigned to receive PNF or assessment only. Follow-up assessments occurred 3 and 6 months after baseline. Results: Findings indicated that the PNF intervention was more effective at both follow-ups in reducing drinking, but not alcohol use problems, for participants scoring higher in coping motives. Furthermore, coping motives were the only drinking motive that uniquely moderated PNF efficacy. Analyses indicated that intervention effects on drinking varied as a function of coping drinking motives; however, intervention effects on norms did not vary by coping motives. Finally, coping motives were found to moderate associations between perceived norms and drinking. Conclusions: These results suggest that coping motives may be useful for identifying young adults—and presumably others—who can most benefit from PNF approaches. Furthermore, PNF may influence future drinking behavior through mechanisms other than changes in perceived norms. Future investigations could examine other pathways through which PNF may reduce drinking.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)495-499
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
Volume77
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2016

Fingerprint

coping
Drinking
Students
Feedback
student
Alcohol Drinking in College
Drinking Behavior
secondary analysis
Alcohol Drinking
alcohol
Alcohols
Research

Cite this

Young, Chelsie M. ; Neighbors, Clayton ; DiBello, Angelo M. ; Sharp, Carla ; Zvolensky, Michael J. ; Lewis, Melissa Ardelle. / Coping motives moderate efficacy of personalized normative feedback among heavy drinking U.S. college students. In: Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2016 ; Vol. 77, No. 3. pp. 495-499.
@article{52bb74dc867d4517a8623ba7d93ab4b1,
title = "Coping motives moderate efficacy of personalized normative feedback among heavy drinking U.S. college students",
abstract = "Objective: Personalized normative feedback (PNF) interventions have received empirical support, are presumed to work by reducing normative misperceptions, and have been found to be particularly efficacious for those who drink for social reasons. However, PNF interventions also offer direct comparisons between one’s own drinking and normative drinking, which may be especially important for coping drinkers. The present research evaluated whether reduced perceived norms and drinking at follow-ups varied as a function of coping motives. Method: Aims were examined as a secondary analysis of a PNF intervention study among 252 U.S. college students. Following baseline assessment, participants were randomly assigned to receive PNF or assessment only. Follow-up assessments occurred 3 and 6 months after baseline. Results: Findings indicated that the PNF intervention was more effective at both follow-ups in reducing drinking, but not alcohol use problems, for participants scoring higher in coping motives. Furthermore, coping motives were the only drinking motive that uniquely moderated PNF efficacy. Analyses indicated that intervention effects on drinking varied as a function of coping drinking motives; however, intervention effects on norms did not vary by coping motives. Finally, coping motives were found to moderate associations between perceived norms and drinking. Conclusions: These results suggest that coping motives may be useful for identifying young adults—and presumably others—who can most benefit from PNF approaches. Furthermore, PNF may influence future drinking behavior through mechanisms other than changes in perceived norms. Future investigations could examine other pathways through which PNF may reduce drinking.",
author = "Young, {Chelsie M.} and Clayton Neighbors and DiBello, {Angelo M.} and Carla Sharp and Zvolensky, {Michael J.} and Lewis, {Melissa Ardelle}",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.15288/jsad.2016.77.495",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "495--499",
journal = "Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs",
issn = "1937-1888",
publisher = "Alcohol Research Documentation, Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Coping motives moderate efficacy of personalized normative feedback among heavy drinking U.S. college students. / Young, Chelsie M.; Neighbors, Clayton; DiBello, Angelo M.; Sharp, Carla; Zvolensky, Michael J.; Lewis, Melissa Ardelle.

In: Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Vol. 77, No. 3, 01.05.2016, p. 495-499.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coping motives moderate efficacy of personalized normative feedback among heavy drinking U.S. college students

AU - Young, Chelsie M.

AU - Neighbors, Clayton

AU - DiBello, Angelo M.

AU - Sharp, Carla

AU - Zvolensky, Michael J.

AU - Lewis, Melissa Ardelle

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - Objective: Personalized normative feedback (PNF) interventions have received empirical support, are presumed to work by reducing normative misperceptions, and have been found to be particularly efficacious for those who drink for social reasons. However, PNF interventions also offer direct comparisons between one’s own drinking and normative drinking, which may be especially important for coping drinkers. The present research evaluated whether reduced perceived norms and drinking at follow-ups varied as a function of coping motives. Method: Aims were examined as a secondary analysis of a PNF intervention study among 252 U.S. college students. Following baseline assessment, participants were randomly assigned to receive PNF or assessment only. Follow-up assessments occurred 3 and 6 months after baseline. Results: Findings indicated that the PNF intervention was more effective at both follow-ups in reducing drinking, but not alcohol use problems, for participants scoring higher in coping motives. Furthermore, coping motives were the only drinking motive that uniquely moderated PNF efficacy. Analyses indicated that intervention effects on drinking varied as a function of coping drinking motives; however, intervention effects on norms did not vary by coping motives. Finally, coping motives were found to moderate associations between perceived norms and drinking. Conclusions: These results suggest that coping motives may be useful for identifying young adults—and presumably others—who can most benefit from PNF approaches. Furthermore, PNF may influence future drinking behavior through mechanisms other than changes in perceived norms. Future investigations could examine other pathways through which PNF may reduce drinking.

AB - Objective: Personalized normative feedback (PNF) interventions have received empirical support, are presumed to work by reducing normative misperceptions, and have been found to be particularly efficacious for those who drink for social reasons. However, PNF interventions also offer direct comparisons between one’s own drinking and normative drinking, which may be especially important for coping drinkers. The present research evaluated whether reduced perceived norms and drinking at follow-ups varied as a function of coping motives. Method: Aims were examined as a secondary analysis of a PNF intervention study among 252 U.S. college students. Following baseline assessment, participants were randomly assigned to receive PNF or assessment only. Follow-up assessments occurred 3 and 6 months after baseline. Results: Findings indicated that the PNF intervention was more effective at both follow-ups in reducing drinking, but not alcohol use problems, for participants scoring higher in coping motives. Furthermore, coping motives were the only drinking motive that uniquely moderated PNF efficacy. Analyses indicated that intervention effects on drinking varied as a function of coping drinking motives; however, intervention effects on norms did not vary by coping motives. Finally, coping motives were found to moderate associations between perceived norms and drinking. Conclusions: These results suggest that coping motives may be useful for identifying young adults—and presumably others—who can most benefit from PNF approaches. Furthermore, PNF may influence future drinking behavior through mechanisms other than changes in perceived norms. Future investigations could examine other pathways through which PNF may reduce drinking.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969242966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.495

DO - 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.495

M3 - Article

C2 - 27172582

AN - SCOPUS:84969242966

VL - 77

SP - 495

EP - 499

JO - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

JF - Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

SN - 1937-1888

IS - 3

ER -