Comparison of surface landmarks for measuring the individualized height of rolling walker

Yawen Zhao, Yasser Salem, Min Li, Hiral Master, Hao Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the wrist joint crease (WJC) and femoral greater trochanter (FGT) methods differ in measuring a rolling walker (RW) height and recommended elbow flexion degree (EFD) and which one is more reliable and valid. Method: Twenty-eight older adults without postural deformity were measured using both methods initially and 5-7 days later. Results: Significant differences (all p < .01) between the WJC and FGT methods were identified on both RW height and the EFD. For the reliability comparison, the correlation coefficients for RW height and EFD from the WJC method were .962, and .596, respectively; while those from the FGT method were .769, and .360, respectively. The WJC method showed validity by generating elbow flexion within the recommended range but the FGT method did not. Conclusion: The WJC is more reliable and valid in measuring RW height and the recommended EFD than the FGT method.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)128-138
Number of pages11
JournalPhysical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Wrist Joint
Elbow
Thigh
Femur

Keywords

  • Ambulatory device
  • Elbow flexion
  • Greater trochanter
  • Wrist joint

Cite this

@article{b267f5e209374a979cbf8c03965795bf,
title = "Comparison of surface landmarks for measuring the individualized height of rolling walker",
abstract = "ABSTRACT Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the wrist joint crease (WJC) and femoral greater trochanter (FGT) methods differ in measuring a rolling walker (RW) height and recommended elbow flexion degree (EFD) and which one is more reliable and valid. Method: Twenty-eight older adults without postural deformity were measured using both methods initially and 5-7 days later. Results: Significant differences (all p < .01) between the WJC and FGT methods were identified on both RW height and the EFD. For the reliability comparison, the correlation coefficients for RW height and EFD from the WJC method were .962, and .596, respectively; while those from the FGT method were .769, and .360, respectively. The WJC method showed validity by generating elbow flexion within the recommended range but the FGT method did not. Conclusion: The WJC is more reliable and valid in measuring RW height and the recommended EFD than the FGT method.",
keywords = "Ambulatory device, Elbow flexion, Greater trochanter, Wrist joint",
author = "Yawen Zhao and Yasser Salem and Min Li and Hiral Master and Hao Liu",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/02703181.2015.1009228",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "128--138",
journal = "Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics",
issn = "0270-3181",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

Comparison of surface landmarks for measuring the individualized height of rolling walker. / Zhao, Yawen; Salem, Yasser; Li, Min; Master, Hiral; Liu, Hao.

In: Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 128-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of surface landmarks for measuring the individualized height of rolling walker

AU - Zhao, Yawen

AU - Salem, Yasser

AU - Li, Min

AU - Master, Hiral

AU - Liu, Hao

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - ABSTRACT Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the wrist joint crease (WJC) and femoral greater trochanter (FGT) methods differ in measuring a rolling walker (RW) height and recommended elbow flexion degree (EFD) and which one is more reliable and valid. Method: Twenty-eight older adults without postural deformity were measured using both methods initially and 5-7 days later. Results: Significant differences (all p < .01) between the WJC and FGT methods were identified on both RW height and the EFD. For the reliability comparison, the correlation coefficients for RW height and EFD from the WJC method were .962, and .596, respectively; while those from the FGT method were .769, and .360, respectively. The WJC method showed validity by generating elbow flexion within the recommended range but the FGT method did not. Conclusion: The WJC is more reliable and valid in measuring RW height and the recommended EFD than the FGT method.

AB - ABSTRACT Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the wrist joint crease (WJC) and femoral greater trochanter (FGT) methods differ in measuring a rolling walker (RW) height and recommended elbow flexion degree (EFD) and which one is more reliable and valid. Method: Twenty-eight older adults without postural deformity were measured using both methods initially and 5-7 days later. Results: Significant differences (all p < .01) between the WJC and FGT methods were identified on both RW height and the EFD. For the reliability comparison, the correlation coefficients for RW height and EFD from the WJC method were .962, and .596, respectively; while those from the FGT method were .769, and .360, respectively. The WJC method showed validity by generating elbow flexion within the recommended range but the FGT method did not. Conclusion: The WJC is more reliable and valid in measuring RW height and the recommended EFD than the FGT method.

KW - Ambulatory device

KW - Elbow flexion

KW - Greater trochanter

KW - Wrist joint

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929718939&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/02703181.2015.1009228

DO - 10.3109/02703181.2015.1009228

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 128

EP - 138

JO - Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics

JF - Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics

SN - 0270-3181

IS - 2

ER -