Comparison of gait characteristics with a single-tip cane, tripod cane, and quad cane

Jeff Nolen, Hao Liu, Hui Liu, Margaret McGee, Victoria Grando

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare both the spatial and gait parameters under the following conditions: walking without a cane (WAC) and with three different types of canes (single tip cane (STC), tripod cane (TPC), and small base quad cane (SQC)). Nineteen young healthy subjects participated in this study by using the GAITRite® walkway. In the order of WAC, STC, TPC, and SQC, subjects demonstrated significant difference of decreased velocity, cadence, and increased stance and swing time (p < 0.001), but no significant difference for step and stride lengths (p > 0.050). Further, using a SQC resulted in a much slower velocity and cadence with more stance time than using an STC or TPC (all p < 0.008), but no such differences were observed between an STC and TPC (p > 0.05). These results indicate that walking with a SQC could be most stable but least efficient, while walking with an STC could be the most efficient but least stable. Walking with a TPC could be an appropriate choice when both walking efficiency and cane stability are considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)387-395
Number of pages9
JournalPhysical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 9 Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Canes
Gait
Walking
Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Drug Combination

Keywords

  • aged
  • assistive device
  • balance
  • posture

Cite this

Nolen, Jeff ; Liu, Hao ; Liu, Hui ; McGee, Margaret ; Grando, Victoria. / Comparison of gait characteristics with a single-tip cane, tripod cane, and quad cane. In: Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics. 2010 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 387-395.
@article{5b06ef859d29426daa05a5797c786daa,
title = "Comparison of gait characteristics with a single-tip cane, tripod cane, and quad cane",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare both the spatial and gait parameters under the following conditions: walking without a cane (WAC) and with three different types of canes (single tip cane (STC), tripod cane (TPC), and small base quad cane (SQC)). Nineteen young healthy subjects participated in this study by using the GAITRite{\circledR} walkway. In the order of WAC, STC, TPC, and SQC, subjects demonstrated significant difference of decreased velocity, cadence, and increased stance and swing time (p < 0.001), but no significant difference for step and stride lengths (p > 0.050). Further, using a SQC resulted in a much slower velocity and cadence with more stance time than using an STC or TPC (all p < 0.008), but no such differences were observed between an STC and TPC (p > 0.05). These results indicate that walking with a SQC could be most stable but least efficient, while walking with an STC could be the most efficient but least stable. Walking with a TPC could be an appropriate choice when both walking efficiency and cane stability are considered.",
keywords = "aged, assistive device, balance, posture",
author = "Jeff Nolen and Hao Liu and Hui Liu and Margaret McGee and Victoria Grando",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "9",
doi = "10.3109/02703181.2010.517620",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "387--395",
journal = "Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics",
issn = "0270-3181",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "4",

}

Comparison of gait characteristics with a single-tip cane, tripod cane, and quad cane. / Nolen, Jeff; Liu, Hao; Liu, Hui; McGee, Margaret; Grando, Victoria.

In: Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 09.12.2010, p. 387-395.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of gait characteristics with a single-tip cane, tripod cane, and quad cane

AU - Nolen, Jeff

AU - Liu, Hao

AU - Liu, Hui

AU - McGee, Margaret

AU - Grando, Victoria

PY - 2010/12/9

Y1 - 2010/12/9

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare both the spatial and gait parameters under the following conditions: walking without a cane (WAC) and with three different types of canes (single tip cane (STC), tripod cane (TPC), and small base quad cane (SQC)). Nineteen young healthy subjects participated in this study by using the GAITRite® walkway. In the order of WAC, STC, TPC, and SQC, subjects demonstrated significant difference of decreased velocity, cadence, and increased stance and swing time (p < 0.001), but no significant difference for step and stride lengths (p > 0.050). Further, using a SQC resulted in a much slower velocity and cadence with more stance time than using an STC or TPC (all p < 0.008), but no such differences were observed between an STC and TPC (p > 0.05). These results indicate that walking with a SQC could be most stable but least efficient, while walking with an STC could be the most efficient but least stable. Walking with a TPC could be an appropriate choice when both walking efficiency and cane stability are considered.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare both the spatial and gait parameters under the following conditions: walking without a cane (WAC) and with three different types of canes (single tip cane (STC), tripod cane (TPC), and small base quad cane (SQC)). Nineteen young healthy subjects participated in this study by using the GAITRite® walkway. In the order of WAC, STC, TPC, and SQC, subjects demonstrated significant difference of decreased velocity, cadence, and increased stance and swing time (p < 0.001), but no significant difference for step and stride lengths (p > 0.050). Further, using a SQC resulted in a much slower velocity and cadence with more stance time than using an STC or TPC (all p < 0.008), but no such differences were observed between an STC and TPC (p > 0.05). These results indicate that walking with a SQC could be most stable but least efficient, while walking with an STC could be the most efficient but least stable. Walking with a TPC could be an appropriate choice when both walking efficiency and cane stability are considered.

KW - aged

KW - assistive device

KW - balance

KW - posture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650782031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/02703181.2010.517620

DO - 10.3109/02703181.2010.517620

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 387

EP - 395

JO - Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics

JF - Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics

SN - 0270-3181

IS - 4

ER -