Comparing the Knotless Tension Band and the Traditional Stainless Steel Wire Tension Band Fixation for Medial Malleolus Fractures: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Michael W. Downey, Kyle Duncan, Victor Kosmopoulos, Travis A. Motley, Brian B. Carpenter, Fadeke Ogunyankin, Alan Garrett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The traditional stainless steel wire tension band (WTB) has been popularized for small avulsion fractures at the medial malleolus. Despite the tension band principle creating a stable construct, complications continue to arise utilizing the traditional stainless steel WTB with patients experiencing hardware irritation at the tension band site and subsequent hardware removal. Coupled with hardware irritation is fatigue failure with the wire. The goal of this investigation was to retrospectively compare this traditional wire technique to an innovative knotless tension band (KTB) technique in order to decrease costly complications. A total of 107 patients were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Outcome measures include descriptive data, fracture classification, results through economic costs, and fixation results (including hardware status, healing status, pain status, and time to healing). The KTB group had a 13% lower true cost as compared to the WTB group while the fixation results were equivocal for the measured outcomes. Our results demonstrate that the innovative KTB is comparable to the traditional WTB while offering a lower true cost, an irritation free reduction all without the frustration of returning to the operating room for additional hardware removal, which averages approximately to $8,288.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3201678
JournalScientifica
Volume2016
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Ankle Fractures
Stainless Steel
stainless steel
wire
fixation
clinical trials
Retrospective Studies
steel
Costs and Cost Analysis
hardware
Frustration
Operating Rooms
Fatigue
Economics
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pain
economic costs
cost
Clinical Studies
pain

Cite this

Downey, Michael W. ; Duncan, Kyle ; Kosmopoulos, Victor ; Motley, Travis A. ; Carpenter, Brian B. ; Ogunyankin, Fadeke ; Garrett, Alan. / Comparing the Knotless Tension Band and the Traditional Stainless Steel Wire Tension Band Fixation for Medial Malleolus Fractures : A Retrospective Clinical Study. In: Scientifica. 2016 ; Vol. 2016.
@article{ae018023e18e4233b054c9076b006fec,
title = "Comparing the Knotless Tension Band and the Traditional Stainless Steel Wire Tension Band Fixation for Medial Malleolus Fractures: A Retrospective Clinical Study",
abstract = "The traditional stainless steel wire tension band (WTB) has been popularized for small avulsion fractures at the medial malleolus. Despite the tension band principle creating a stable construct, complications continue to arise utilizing the traditional stainless steel WTB with patients experiencing hardware irritation at the tension band site and subsequent hardware removal. Coupled with hardware irritation is fatigue failure with the wire. The goal of this investigation was to retrospectively compare this traditional wire technique to an innovative knotless tension band (KTB) technique in order to decrease costly complications. A total of 107 patients were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Outcome measures include descriptive data, fracture classification, results through economic costs, and fixation results (including hardware status, healing status, pain status, and time to healing). The KTB group had a 13{\%} lower true cost as compared to the WTB group while the fixation results were equivocal for the measured outcomes. Our results demonstrate that the innovative KTB is comparable to the traditional WTB while offering a lower true cost, an irritation free reduction all without the frustration of returning to the operating room for additional hardware removal, which averages approximately to $8,288.",
author = "Downey, {Michael W.} and Kyle Duncan and Victor Kosmopoulos and Motley, {Travis A.} and Carpenter, {Brian B.} and Fadeke Ogunyankin and Alan Garrett",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1155/2016/3201678",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
journal = "Scientifica",
issn = "2090-908X",
publisher = "Hindawi Limited",

}

Comparing the Knotless Tension Band and the Traditional Stainless Steel Wire Tension Band Fixation for Medial Malleolus Fractures : A Retrospective Clinical Study. / Downey, Michael W.; Duncan, Kyle; Kosmopoulos, Victor; Motley, Travis A.; Carpenter, Brian B.; Ogunyankin, Fadeke; Garrett, Alan.

In: Scientifica, Vol. 2016, 3201678, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the Knotless Tension Band and the Traditional Stainless Steel Wire Tension Band Fixation for Medial Malleolus Fractures

T2 - A Retrospective Clinical Study

AU - Downey, Michael W.

AU - Duncan, Kyle

AU - Kosmopoulos, Victor

AU - Motley, Travis A.

AU - Carpenter, Brian B.

AU - Ogunyankin, Fadeke

AU - Garrett, Alan

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - The traditional stainless steel wire tension band (WTB) has been popularized for small avulsion fractures at the medial malleolus. Despite the tension band principle creating a stable construct, complications continue to arise utilizing the traditional stainless steel WTB with patients experiencing hardware irritation at the tension band site and subsequent hardware removal. Coupled with hardware irritation is fatigue failure with the wire. The goal of this investigation was to retrospectively compare this traditional wire technique to an innovative knotless tension band (KTB) technique in order to decrease costly complications. A total of 107 patients were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Outcome measures include descriptive data, fracture classification, results through economic costs, and fixation results (including hardware status, healing status, pain status, and time to healing). The KTB group had a 13% lower true cost as compared to the WTB group while the fixation results were equivocal for the measured outcomes. Our results demonstrate that the innovative KTB is comparable to the traditional WTB while offering a lower true cost, an irritation free reduction all without the frustration of returning to the operating room for additional hardware removal, which averages approximately to $8,288.

AB - The traditional stainless steel wire tension band (WTB) has been popularized for small avulsion fractures at the medial malleolus. Despite the tension band principle creating a stable construct, complications continue to arise utilizing the traditional stainless steel WTB with patients experiencing hardware irritation at the tension band site and subsequent hardware removal. Coupled with hardware irritation is fatigue failure with the wire. The goal of this investigation was to retrospectively compare this traditional wire technique to an innovative knotless tension band (KTB) technique in order to decrease costly complications. A total of 107 patients were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Outcome measures include descriptive data, fracture classification, results through economic costs, and fixation results (including hardware status, healing status, pain status, and time to healing). The KTB group had a 13% lower true cost as compared to the WTB group while the fixation results were equivocal for the measured outcomes. Our results demonstrate that the innovative KTB is comparable to the traditional WTB while offering a lower true cost, an irritation free reduction all without the frustration of returning to the operating room for additional hardware removal, which averages approximately to $8,288.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019164339&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2016/3201678

DO - 10.1155/2016/3201678

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85019164339

VL - 2016

JO - Scientifica

JF - Scientifica

SN - 2090-908X

M1 - 3201678

ER -