Cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment

A randomized pilot trial

Namrata Das, Jeffrey S. Spence, Sina Aslan, Sven Vanneste, Raksha Mudar, Audette Rackley, Mary Ellen Quiceno, Sandra Bond Chapman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive stimulation, represents a potential intervention to enhance cognition across clinical populations including Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This randomized clinical trial in MCI investigated the effects of anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) delivered to left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) combined with gist-reasoning training (SMART) versus sham tDCS (s-tDCS) plus SMART on measures of cognitive and neural changes in resting cerebral blood flow (rCBF). We were also interested in SMART effects on cognitive performance regardless of the tDCS group. Methods: Twenty-two MCI participants, who completed the baseline cognitive assessment (T1), were randomized into one of two groups: a-tDCS + SMART and s-tDCS + SMART. Of which, 20 participants completed resting pCASL MRI scan to measure rCBF. Eight SMART sessions were administered over 4 weeks with a-tDCS or s-tDCS stimulation for 20 min before each session. Participants were assessed immediately (T2) and 3-months after training (T3). Results: Significant group × time interactions showed cognitive gains at T2 in executive function (EF) measure of inhibition [DKEFS- Color word (p = 0.047)], innovation [TOSL (p = 0.01)] and on episodic memory [TOSL (p = 0.048)] in s-tDCS + SMART but not in a-tDCS + SMART group. Nonetheless, the gains did not persist for 3 months (T3) after the training. A voxel-based analysis showed significant increase in regional rCBF in the right middle frontal cortex (MFC) (cluster-wise p = 0.05, k = 1,168 mm3) in a-tDCS + SMART compared to s-tDCS + SMART. No significant relationship was observed between the increased CBF with cognition. Irrespective of group, the combined MCI showed gains at T2 in EF of conceptual reasoning [DKEFS card sort (p = 0.033)] and category fluency [COWAT (p = 0.055)], along with gains at T3 in EF of verbal fluency [COWAT (p = 0.009)]. Conclusion: One intriguing finding is a-tDCS to left IFG plus SMART increased blood flow to right MFC, however, the stimulation seemingly blocked cognitive benefits of SMART on EF (inhibition and innovation) and episodic memory compared to s-tDCS + SMART group. Although the sample size is small, this paper contributes to growing evidence that cognitive training provides a way to significantly enhance cognitive performance in adults showing memory loss, where the role of a-tDCS in augmenting these effects need further study.

Original languageEnglish
Article number307
JournalFrontiers in Neuroscience
Volume13
Issue numberAPR
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Cerebrovascular Circulation
Executive Function
Episodic Memory
Cognitive Dysfunction
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Frontal Lobe
Prefrontal Cortex
Cognition
Memory Disorders
Sample Size
Alzheimer Disease
Randomized Controlled Trials
Color
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Population
Inhibition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Brain modulation
  • Cerebral blood flow
  • Cognitive training
  • FMRI
  • Mild cognitive impairment
  • Strategic memory advanced reasoning training
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation

Cite this

Das, Namrata ; Spence, Jeffrey S. ; Aslan, Sina ; Vanneste, Sven ; Mudar, Raksha ; Rackley, Audette ; Quiceno, Mary Ellen ; Chapman, Sandra Bond. / Cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment : A randomized pilot trial. In: Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. APR.
@article{7fde782a5a4d43a2a1aff31af6099871,
title = "Cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment: A randomized pilot trial",
abstract = "Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive stimulation, represents a potential intervention to enhance cognition across clinical populations including Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This randomized clinical trial in MCI investigated the effects of anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) delivered to left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) combined with gist-reasoning training (SMART) versus sham tDCS (s-tDCS) plus SMART on measures of cognitive and neural changes in resting cerebral blood flow (rCBF). We were also interested in SMART effects on cognitive performance regardless of the tDCS group. Methods: Twenty-two MCI participants, who completed the baseline cognitive assessment (T1), were randomized into one of two groups: a-tDCS + SMART and s-tDCS + SMART. Of which, 20 participants completed resting pCASL MRI scan to measure rCBF. Eight SMART sessions were administered over 4 weeks with a-tDCS or s-tDCS stimulation for 20 min before each session. Participants were assessed immediately (T2) and 3-months after training (T3). Results: Significant group × time interactions showed cognitive gains at T2 in executive function (EF) measure of inhibition [DKEFS- Color word (p = 0.047)], innovation [TOSL (p = 0.01)] and on episodic memory [TOSL (p = 0.048)] in s-tDCS + SMART but not in a-tDCS + SMART group. Nonetheless, the gains did not persist for 3 months (T3) after the training. A voxel-based analysis showed significant increase in regional rCBF in the right middle frontal cortex (MFC) (cluster-wise p = 0.05, k = 1,168 mm3) in a-tDCS + SMART compared to s-tDCS + SMART. No significant relationship was observed between the increased CBF with cognition. Irrespective of group, the combined MCI showed gains at T2 in EF of conceptual reasoning [DKEFS card sort (p = 0.033)] and category fluency [COWAT (p = 0.055)], along with gains at T3 in EF of verbal fluency [COWAT (p = 0.009)]. Conclusion: One intriguing finding is a-tDCS to left IFG plus SMART increased blood flow to right MFC, however, the stimulation seemingly blocked cognitive benefits of SMART on EF (inhibition and innovation) and episodic memory compared to s-tDCS + SMART group. Although the sample size is small, this paper contributes to growing evidence that cognitive training provides a way to significantly enhance cognitive performance in adults showing memory loss, where the role of a-tDCS in augmenting these effects need further study.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, Brain modulation, Cerebral blood flow, Cognitive training, FMRI, Mild cognitive impairment, Strategic memory advanced reasoning training, Transcranial direct current stimulation",
author = "Namrata Das and Spence, {Jeffrey S.} and Sina Aslan and Sven Vanneste and Raksha Mudar and Audette Rackley and Quiceno, {Mary Ellen} and Chapman, {Sandra Bond}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fnins.2019.00307",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Frontiers in Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-4548",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",
number = "APR",

}

Das, N, Spence, JS, Aslan, S, Vanneste, S, Mudar, R, Rackley, A, Quiceno, ME & Chapman, SB 2019, 'Cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment: A randomized pilot trial', Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. APR, 307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00307

Cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment : A randomized pilot trial. / Das, Namrata; Spence, Jeffrey S.; Aslan, Sina; Vanneste, Sven; Mudar, Raksha; Rackley, Audette; Quiceno, Mary Ellen; Chapman, Sandra Bond.

In: Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 13, No. APR, 307, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive training and transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment

T2 - A randomized pilot trial

AU - Das, Namrata

AU - Spence, Jeffrey S.

AU - Aslan, Sina

AU - Vanneste, Sven

AU - Mudar, Raksha

AU - Rackley, Audette

AU - Quiceno, Mary Ellen

AU - Chapman, Sandra Bond

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive stimulation, represents a potential intervention to enhance cognition across clinical populations including Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This randomized clinical trial in MCI investigated the effects of anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) delivered to left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) combined with gist-reasoning training (SMART) versus sham tDCS (s-tDCS) plus SMART on measures of cognitive and neural changes in resting cerebral blood flow (rCBF). We were also interested in SMART effects on cognitive performance regardless of the tDCS group. Methods: Twenty-two MCI participants, who completed the baseline cognitive assessment (T1), were randomized into one of two groups: a-tDCS + SMART and s-tDCS + SMART. Of which, 20 participants completed resting pCASL MRI scan to measure rCBF. Eight SMART sessions were administered over 4 weeks with a-tDCS or s-tDCS stimulation for 20 min before each session. Participants were assessed immediately (T2) and 3-months after training (T3). Results: Significant group × time interactions showed cognitive gains at T2 in executive function (EF) measure of inhibition [DKEFS- Color word (p = 0.047)], innovation [TOSL (p = 0.01)] and on episodic memory [TOSL (p = 0.048)] in s-tDCS + SMART but not in a-tDCS + SMART group. Nonetheless, the gains did not persist for 3 months (T3) after the training. A voxel-based analysis showed significant increase in regional rCBF in the right middle frontal cortex (MFC) (cluster-wise p = 0.05, k = 1,168 mm3) in a-tDCS + SMART compared to s-tDCS + SMART. No significant relationship was observed between the increased CBF with cognition. Irrespective of group, the combined MCI showed gains at T2 in EF of conceptual reasoning [DKEFS card sort (p = 0.033)] and category fluency [COWAT (p = 0.055)], along with gains at T3 in EF of verbal fluency [COWAT (p = 0.009)]. Conclusion: One intriguing finding is a-tDCS to left IFG plus SMART increased blood flow to right MFC, however, the stimulation seemingly blocked cognitive benefits of SMART on EF (inhibition and innovation) and episodic memory compared to s-tDCS + SMART group. Although the sample size is small, this paper contributes to growing evidence that cognitive training provides a way to significantly enhance cognitive performance in adults showing memory loss, where the role of a-tDCS in augmenting these effects need further study.

AB - Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive stimulation, represents a potential intervention to enhance cognition across clinical populations including Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This randomized clinical trial in MCI investigated the effects of anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) delivered to left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) combined with gist-reasoning training (SMART) versus sham tDCS (s-tDCS) plus SMART on measures of cognitive and neural changes in resting cerebral blood flow (rCBF). We were also interested in SMART effects on cognitive performance regardless of the tDCS group. Methods: Twenty-two MCI participants, who completed the baseline cognitive assessment (T1), were randomized into one of two groups: a-tDCS + SMART and s-tDCS + SMART. Of which, 20 participants completed resting pCASL MRI scan to measure rCBF. Eight SMART sessions were administered over 4 weeks with a-tDCS or s-tDCS stimulation for 20 min before each session. Participants were assessed immediately (T2) and 3-months after training (T3). Results: Significant group × time interactions showed cognitive gains at T2 in executive function (EF) measure of inhibition [DKEFS- Color word (p = 0.047)], innovation [TOSL (p = 0.01)] and on episodic memory [TOSL (p = 0.048)] in s-tDCS + SMART but not in a-tDCS + SMART group. Nonetheless, the gains did not persist for 3 months (T3) after the training. A voxel-based analysis showed significant increase in regional rCBF in the right middle frontal cortex (MFC) (cluster-wise p = 0.05, k = 1,168 mm3) in a-tDCS + SMART compared to s-tDCS + SMART. No significant relationship was observed between the increased CBF with cognition. Irrespective of group, the combined MCI showed gains at T2 in EF of conceptual reasoning [DKEFS card sort (p = 0.033)] and category fluency [COWAT (p = 0.055)], along with gains at T3 in EF of verbal fluency [COWAT (p = 0.009)]. Conclusion: One intriguing finding is a-tDCS to left IFG plus SMART increased blood flow to right MFC, however, the stimulation seemingly blocked cognitive benefits of SMART on EF (inhibition and innovation) and episodic memory compared to s-tDCS + SMART group. Although the sample size is small, this paper contributes to growing evidence that cognitive training provides a way to significantly enhance cognitive performance in adults showing memory loss, where the role of a-tDCS in augmenting these effects need further study.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - Brain modulation

KW - Cerebral blood flow

KW - Cognitive training

KW - FMRI

KW - Mild cognitive impairment

KW - Strategic memory advanced reasoning training

KW - Transcranial direct current stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068356670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2019.00307

DO - 10.3389/fnins.2019.00307

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Neuroscience

SN - 1662-4548

IS - APR

M1 - 307

ER -