Brief motivational interventions for college student drinking may not be as powerful as we think: An individual participant-level data meta-analysis

David Huh, Eun Young Mun, Mary E. Larimer, Helene R. White, Anne E. Ray, Isaac C. Rhew, Su Young Kim, Yang Jiao, David C. Atkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: For over 2 decades, brief motivational interventions (BMIs) have been implemented on college campuses to reduce heavy drinking and related negative consequences. Such interventions include in-person motivational interviews (MIs), often incorporating personalized feedback (PF), and stand-alone PF interventions delivered via mail, computer, or the Web. Both narrative and meta-analytic reviews using aggregate data from published studies suggest at least short-term efficacy of BMIs, although overall effect sizes have been small. Methods: This study was an individual participant-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of 17 randomized clinical trials evaluating BMIs. Unlike typical meta-analysis based on summary data, IPD meta-analysis allows for an analysis that correctly accommodates the sampling, sample characteristics, and distributions of the pooled data. In particular, highly skewed distributions with many zeroes are typical for drinking outcomes, but have not been adequately accounted for in existing studies. Data are from Project INTEGRATE, one of the largest IPD meta-analysis projects to date in alcohol intervention research, representing 6,713 individuals each with 2 to 5 repeated measures up to 12 months postbaseline. Results: We used Bayesian multilevel over dispersed Poisson hurdle models to estimate intervention effects on drinks per week and peak drinking, and Gaussian models for alcohol problems. Estimates of overall intervention effects were very small and not statistically significant for any of the outcomes. We further conducted post hoc comparisons of 3 intervention types (individual MI with PF, PF only, and group MI) versus control. There was a small, statistically significant reduction in alcohol problems among participants who received an individual MI with PF. Short-term and long-term results were similar. Conclusions: This study questions the efficacy and magnitude of effects of BMIs for college drinking prevention and intervention and suggests a need for the development of more effective intervention strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)919-931
Number of pages13
JournalAlcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2015

Fingerprint

Metadata
Meta-Analysis
Students
Feedback
Interviews
Drinking
Alcohols
Postal Service
Randomized Controlled Trials
Alcohol Drinking in College
Sampling
Research

Keywords

  • Bayesian multilevel models
  • Brief motivational interventions
  • College drinking
  • Integrative data analysis
  • Meta-analysis

Cite this

Huh, David ; Mun, Eun Young ; Larimer, Mary E. ; White, Helene R. ; Ray, Anne E. ; Rhew, Isaac C. ; Kim, Su Young ; Jiao, Yang ; Atkins, David C. / Brief motivational interventions for college student drinking may not be as powerful as we think : An individual participant-level data meta-analysis. In: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2015 ; Vol. 39, No. 5. pp. 919-931.
@article{d7f1b8a3c9924163b8f4c33fde3d9198,
title = "Brief motivational interventions for college student drinking may not be as powerful as we think: An individual participant-level data meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background: For over 2 decades, brief motivational interventions (BMIs) have been implemented on college campuses to reduce heavy drinking and related negative consequences. Such interventions include in-person motivational interviews (MIs), often incorporating personalized feedback (PF), and stand-alone PF interventions delivered via mail, computer, or the Web. Both narrative and meta-analytic reviews using aggregate data from published studies suggest at least short-term efficacy of BMIs, although overall effect sizes have been small. Methods: This study was an individual participant-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of 17 randomized clinical trials evaluating BMIs. Unlike typical meta-analysis based on summary data, IPD meta-analysis allows for an analysis that correctly accommodates the sampling, sample characteristics, and distributions of the pooled data. In particular, highly skewed distributions with many zeroes are typical for drinking outcomes, but have not been adequately accounted for in existing studies. Data are from Project INTEGRATE, one of the largest IPD meta-analysis projects to date in alcohol intervention research, representing 6,713 individuals each with 2 to 5 repeated measures up to 12 months postbaseline. Results: We used Bayesian multilevel over dispersed Poisson hurdle models to estimate intervention effects on drinks per week and peak drinking, and Gaussian models for alcohol problems. Estimates of overall intervention effects were very small and not statistically significant for any of the outcomes. We further conducted post hoc comparisons of 3 intervention types (individual MI with PF, PF only, and group MI) versus control. There was a small, statistically significant reduction in alcohol problems among participants who received an individual MI with PF. Short-term and long-term results were similar. Conclusions: This study questions the efficacy and magnitude of effects of BMIs for college drinking prevention and intervention and suggests a need for the development of more effective intervention strategies.",
keywords = "Bayesian multilevel models, Brief motivational interventions, College drinking, Integrative data analysis, Meta-analysis",
author = "David Huh and Mun, {Eun Young} and Larimer, {Mary E.} and White, {Helene R.} and Ray, {Anne E.} and Rhew, {Isaac C.} and Kim, {Su Young} and Yang Jiao and Atkins, {David C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/acer.12714",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "919--931",
journal = "Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research",
issn = "0145-6008",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Brief motivational interventions for college student drinking may not be as powerful as we think : An individual participant-level data meta-analysis. / Huh, David; Mun, Eun Young; Larimer, Mary E.; White, Helene R.; Ray, Anne E.; Rhew, Isaac C.; Kim, Su Young; Jiao, Yang; Atkins, David C.

In: Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, Vol. 39, No. 5, 01.05.2015, p. 919-931.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brief motivational interventions for college student drinking may not be as powerful as we think

T2 - An individual participant-level data meta-analysis

AU - Huh, David

AU - Mun, Eun Young

AU - Larimer, Mary E.

AU - White, Helene R.

AU - Ray, Anne E.

AU - Rhew, Isaac C.

AU - Kim, Su Young

AU - Jiao, Yang

AU - Atkins, David C.

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Background: For over 2 decades, brief motivational interventions (BMIs) have been implemented on college campuses to reduce heavy drinking and related negative consequences. Such interventions include in-person motivational interviews (MIs), often incorporating personalized feedback (PF), and stand-alone PF interventions delivered via mail, computer, or the Web. Both narrative and meta-analytic reviews using aggregate data from published studies suggest at least short-term efficacy of BMIs, although overall effect sizes have been small. Methods: This study was an individual participant-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of 17 randomized clinical trials evaluating BMIs. Unlike typical meta-analysis based on summary data, IPD meta-analysis allows for an analysis that correctly accommodates the sampling, sample characteristics, and distributions of the pooled data. In particular, highly skewed distributions with many zeroes are typical for drinking outcomes, but have not been adequately accounted for in existing studies. Data are from Project INTEGRATE, one of the largest IPD meta-analysis projects to date in alcohol intervention research, representing 6,713 individuals each with 2 to 5 repeated measures up to 12 months postbaseline. Results: We used Bayesian multilevel over dispersed Poisson hurdle models to estimate intervention effects on drinks per week and peak drinking, and Gaussian models for alcohol problems. Estimates of overall intervention effects were very small and not statistically significant for any of the outcomes. We further conducted post hoc comparisons of 3 intervention types (individual MI with PF, PF only, and group MI) versus control. There was a small, statistically significant reduction in alcohol problems among participants who received an individual MI with PF. Short-term and long-term results were similar. Conclusions: This study questions the efficacy and magnitude of effects of BMIs for college drinking prevention and intervention and suggests a need for the development of more effective intervention strategies.

AB - Background: For over 2 decades, brief motivational interventions (BMIs) have been implemented on college campuses to reduce heavy drinking and related negative consequences. Such interventions include in-person motivational interviews (MIs), often incorporating personalized feedback (PF), and stand-alone PF interventions delivered via mail, computer, or the Web. Both narrative and meta-analytic reviews using aggregate data from published studies suggest at least short-term efficacy of BMIs, although overall effect sizes have been small. Methods: This study was an individual participant-level data (IPD) meta-analysis of 17 randomized clinical trials evaluating BMIs. Unlike typical meta-analysis based on summary data, IPD meta-analysis allows for an analysis that correctly accommodates the sampling, sample characteristics, and distributions of the pooled data. In particular, highly skewed distributions with many zeroes are typical for drinking outcomes, but have not been adequately accounted for in existing studies. Data are from Project INTEGRATE, one of the largest IPD meta-analysis projects to date in alcohol intervention research, representing 6,713 individuals each with 2 to 5 repeated measures up to 12 months postbaseline. Results: We used Bayesian multilevel over dispersed Poisson hurdle models to estimate intervention effects on drinks per week and peak drinking, and Gaussian models for alcohol problems. Estimates of overall intervention effects were very small and not statistically significant for any of the outcomes. We further conducted post hoc comparisons of 3 intervention types (individual MI with PF, PF only, and group MI) versus control. There was a small, statistically significant reduction in alcohol problems among participants who received an individual MI with PF. Short-term and long-term results were similar. Conclusions: This study questions the efficacy and magnitude of effects of BMIs for college drinking prevention and intervention and suggests a need for the development of more effective intervention strategies.

KW - Bayesian multilevel models

KW - Brief motivational interventions

KW - College drinking

KW - Integrative data analysis

KW - Meta-analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927644012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/acer.12714

DO - 10.1111/acer.12714

M3 - Article

C2 - 25872599

AN - SCOPUS:84927644012

VL - 39

SP - 919

EP - 931

JO - Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

JF - Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

SN - 0145-6008

IS - 5

ER -