Biofeedback

Raymond Gaeta, Carl Noe, Robert J. Gatchel

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Over the years, there have been various unusual instances of the voluntary control over physiological functions noted in the scientific literature. Luria (1958) presented a case of a mnemonist who had remarkable control of his heart rate and skin temperature to the degree that he could abruptly alter his heart rate by 50 beats per minute, and could also raise the skin temperature of one hand while simultaneously lowering the temperature of the other hand. The modification of physiological activities such as this has been the subject of anecdotal reports for a considerable period of time. Although true empirical investigation into such self-regulation through biofeedback began in the 1960s, gaining voluntary control of various physiological activities has been a goal in many different cultures for a variety of reasons. Gatchel (1999) and Gatchel et al. (2003b) have reviewed the goals that have been traditionally sought with regard to gaining control of physiological functioning: In order to achieve spiritual enlightenment, yogis and other mystics of the eastern tradition have demonstrated that through certain physical exercises, or by a sheer act of will, that individuals are capable of producing significant physiochemical changes in their bodies which, in turn, produce perceived pleasant states of consciousness (Bagchi, 1959; Bagchi & Wenger, 1957). In order to test various theories of learning, psychologists have long debated the issue of whether autonomic nervous system responses could be operantly conditioned. During the 1960s, biofeedback was viewed as a potential clinical treatment procedure for modifying psychological and medical disorders. The major focus of this present chapter is on the third category of how voluntary control of physiological activity can be used as a clinical treatment modality for medically related disorders.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, Second Edition
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages335-340
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9780511543579
ISBN (Print)9780511543579
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Skin Temperature
Hand
Heart Rate
Psychology
Literature
Autonomic Nervous System
Consciousness
Biofeedback (Psychology)
Learning
Exercise
Temperature
Therapeutics
Self-Control

Cite this

Gaeta, R., Noe, C., & Gatchel, R. J. (2014). Biofeedback. In Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, Second Edition (pp. 335-340). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543579.073
Gaeta, Raymond ; Noe, Carl ; Gatchel, Robert J. / Biofeedback. Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2014. pp. 335-340
@inbook{bbfb73f258994d7482d783d12da773aa,
title = "Biofeedback",
abstract = "Over the years, there have been various unusual instances of the voluntary control over physiological functions noted in the scientific literature. Luria (1958) presented a case of a mnemonist who had remarkable control of his heart rate and skin temperature to the degree that he could abruptly alter his heart rate by 50 beats per minute, and could also raise the skin temperature of one hand while simultaneously lowering the temperature of the other hand. The modification of physiological activities such as this has been the subject of anecdotal reports for a considerable period of time. Although true empirical investigation into such self-regulation through biofeedback began in the 1960s, gaining voluntary control of various physiological activities has been a goal in many different cultures for a variety of reasons. Gatchel (1999) and Gatchel et al. (2003b) have reviewed the goals that have been traditionally sought with regard to gaining control of physiological functioning: In order to achieve spiritual enlightenment, yogis and other mystics of the eastern tradition have demonstrated that through certain physical exercises, or by a sheer act of will, that individuals are capable of producing significant physiochemical changes in their bodies which, in turn, produce perceived pleasant states of consciousness (Bagchi, 1959; Bagchi & Wenger, 1957). In order to test various theories of learning, psychologists have long debated the issue of whether autonomic nervous system responses could be operantly conditioned. During the 1960s, biofeedback was viewed as a potential clinical treatment procedure for modifying psychological and medical disorders. The major focus of this present chapter is on the third category of how voluntary control of physiological activity can be used as a clinical treatment modality for medically related disorders.",
author = "Raymond Gaeta and Carl Noe and Gatchel, {Robert J.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511543579.073",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780511543579",
pages = "335--340",
booktitle = "Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, Second Edition",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

Gaeta, R, Noe, C & Gatchel, RJ 2014, Biofeedback. in Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, pp. 335-340. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543579.073

Biofeedback. / Gaeta, Raymond; Noe, Carl; Gatchel, Robert J.

Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2014. p. 335-340.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Biofeedback

AU - Gaeta, Raymond

AU - Noe, Carl

AU - Gatchel, Robert J.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Over the years, there have been various unusual instances of the voluntary control over physiological functions noted in the scientific literature. Luria (1958) presented a case of a mnemonist who had remarkable control of his heart rate and skin temperature to the degree that he could abruptly alter his heart rate by 50 beats per minute, and could also raise the skin temperature of one hand while simultaneously lowering the temperature of the other hand. The modification of physiological activities such as this has been the subject of anecdotal reports for a considerable period of time. Although true empirical investigation into such self-regulation through biofeedback began in the 1960s, gaining voluntary control of various physiological activities has been a goal in many different cultures for a variety of reasons. Gatchel (1999) and Gatchel et al. (2003b) have reviewed the goals that have been traditionally sought with regard to gaining control of physiological functioning: In order to achieve spiritual enlightenment, yogis and other mystics of the eastern tradition have demonstrated that through certain physical exercises, or by a sheer act of will, that individuals are capable of producing significant physiochemical changes in their bodies which, in turn, produce perceived pleasant states of consciousness (Bagchi, 1959; Bagchi & Wenger, 1957). In order to test various theories of learning, psychologists have long debated the issue of whether autonomic nervous system responses could be operantly conditioned. During the 1960s, biofeedback was viewed as a potential clinical treatment procedure for modifying psychological and medical disorders. The major focus of this present chapter is on the third category of how voluntary control of physiological activity can be used as a clinical treatment modality for medically related disorders.

AB - Over the years, there have been various unusual instances of the voluntary control over physiological functions noted in the scientific literature. Luria (1958) presented a case of a mnemonist who had remarkable control of his heart rate and skin temperature to the degree that he could abruptly alter his heart rate by 50 beats per minute, and could also raise the skin temperature of one hand while simultaneously lowering the temperature of the other hand. The modification of physiological activities such as this has been the subject of anecdotal reports for a considerable period of time. Although true empirical investigation into such self-regulation through biofeedback began in the 1960s, gaining voluntary control of various physiological activities has been a goal in many different cultures for a variety of reasons. Gatchel (1999) and Gatchel et al. (2003b) have reviewed the goals that have been traditionally sought with regard to gaining control of physiological functioning: In order to achieve spiritual enlightenment, yogis and other mystics of the eastern tradition have demonstrated that through certain physical exercises, or by a sheer act of will, that individuals are capable of producing significant physiochemical changes in their bodies which, in turn, produce perceived pleasant states of consciousness (Bagchi, 1959; Bagchi & Wenger, 1957). In order to test various theories of learning, psychologists have long debated the issue of whether autonomic nervous system responses could be operantly conditioned. During the 1960s, biofeedback was viewed as a potential clinical treatment procedure for modifying psychological and medical disorders. The major focus of this present chapter is on the third category of how voluntary control of physiological activity can be used as a clinical treatment modality for medically related disorders.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952940188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511543579.073

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511543579.073

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84952940188

SN - 9780511543579

SP - 335

EP - 340

BT - Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, Second Edition

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Gaeta R, Noe C, Gatchel RJ. Biofeedback. In Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press. 2014. p. 335-340 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543579.073