TY - JOUR
T1 - Binding of myosin subfragment-1 to F-actin
AU - Andreev, O.
AU - Borejdo, J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank A. Andreeva for technical help. Supported by NIH
PY - 1992/10/15
Y1 - 1992/10/15
N2 - During a part of the hydrolytic cycle, myosin head (S1) carries no nucleotide and binds strongly to an actin filament forming a rigor bond. At saturating concentration of S1 in rigor, S1 is well known to form 1:1 complex with actin. However, we have provided evidence that under certain conditions S1 could also form a complex with 2 actin monomers in a filament (Andreev, O.A. & Borejdo, J. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 177, 350-356). This view was recently challenged by Carlier & Didry (Carlier, M-F. & Didry, D. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 183, 970-974) who interpreted our data by suggesting that F-actin underwent a simple depolymerization and implied that, when only actin in the F-form was scored, the real stoichiometry in our experiments was 1:1. We show here that under conditions of our experiments less than 8% of actin was depolymerized. Moreover, we have repeated the experiments in the presence of phalloidin and show that under these conditions too, when S1 was added slowly to a fixed concentration of F-actin, it formed a different complex with F-actin than when it was added quickly. This confirms our original conclusion that S1 can bind actin in two different ways and shows that depolymerization of F-actin is not responsible for this finding.
AB - During a part of the hydrolytic cycle, myosin head (S1) carries no nucleotide and binds strongly to an actin filament forming a rigor bond. At saturating concentration of S1 in rigor, S1 is well known to form 1:1 complex with actin. However, we have provided evidence that under certain conditions S1 could also form a complex with 2 actin monomers in a filament (Andreev, O.A. & Borejdo, J. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 177, 350-356). This view was recently challenged by Carlier & Didry (Carlier, M-F. & Didry, D. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 183, 970-974) who interpreted our data by suggesting that F-actin underwent a simple depolymerization and implied that, when only actin in the F-form was scored, the real stoichiometry in our experiments was 1:1. We show here that under conditions of our experiments less than 8% of actin was depolymerized. Moreover, we have repeated the experiments in the presence of phalloidin and show that under these conditions too, when S1 was added slowly to a fixed concentration of F-actin, it formed a different complex with F-actin than when it was added quickly. This confirms our original conclusion that S1 can bind actin in two different ways and shows that depolymerization of F-actin is not responsible for this finding.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026446791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0006-291X(92)92354-Z
DO - 10.1016/0006-291X(92)92354-Z
M3 - Article
C2 - 1417872
AN - SCOPUS:0026446791
SN - 0006-291X
VL - 188
SP - 94
EP - 101
JO - Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
JF - Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
IS - 1
ER -