Assessment of the role of DNA repair in damaged forensic samples

Angie Ambers, Meredith Turnbough, Robert Benjamin, Jonathan King, Bruce Budowle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previous studies on DNA damage and repair have involved in vitro laboratory procedures that induce a single type of lesion in naked templates. Although repair of singular, sequestered types of DNA damage has shown some success, forensic and ancient specimens likely contain a number of different types of lesions. This study sought to (1) develop protocols to damage DNA in its native state, (2) generate a pool of candidate samples for repair that more likely emulate authentic forensic samples, and (3) assess the ability of the PreCRTM Repair Mix to repair the resultant lesions. Complexed, native DNA is more difficult to damage than naked DNA. Modified procedures included the use of higher concentrations and longer exposure times. Three types of samples, those that demonstrated damage based on short tandem repeat (STR) profile signals, were selected for repair experiments: environmentally damaged bloodstains, bleach-damaged whole blood, and human skeletal remains. Results showed trends of improved performance of STR profiling of bleach-damaged DNA. However, the repair assay did not improve DNA profiles from environmentally damaged bloodstains or bone, and in some cases resulted in lower RFU values for STR alleles. The extensive spectrum of DNA damage and myriad combinations of lesions that can be present in forensic samples appears to pose a challenge for the in vitro PreCRTM assay. The data suggest that the use of PreCR in casework should be considered with caution due to the assay’s varied results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)913-921
Number of pages9
JournalInternational journal of legal medicine
Volume128
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

DNA Repair
DNA Damage
Microsatellite Repeats
DNA
Alleles
Bone and Bones
Body Remains
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • DNA damage
  • DNA repair
  • Human skeletal remains
  • PreCR™ Repair Mix

Cite this

Ambers, Angie ; Turnbough, Meredith ; Benjamin, Robert ; King, Jonathan ; Budowle, Bruce. / Assessment of the role of DNA repair in damaged forensic samples. In: International journal of legal medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 128, No. 6. pp. 913-921.
@article{283daff5942d4c5fa2d654b2d8919af1,
title = "Assessment of the role of DNA repair in damaged forensic samples",
abstract = "Previous studies on DNA damage and repair have involved in vitro laboratory procedures that induce a single type of lesion in naked templates. Although repair of singular, sequestered types of DNA damage has shown some success, forensic and ancient specimens likely contain a number of different types of lesions. This study sought to (1) develop protocols to damage DNA in its native state, (2) generate a pool of candidate samples for repair that more likely emulate authentic forensic samples, and (3) assess the ability of the PreCRTM Repair Mix to repair the resultant lesions. Complexed, native DNA is more difficult to damage than naked DNA. Modified procedures included the use of higher concentrations and longer exposure times. Three types of samples, those that demonstrated damage based on short tandem repeat (STR) profile signals, were selected for repair experiments: environmentally damaged bloodstains, bleach-damaged whole blood, and human skeletal remains. Results showed trends of improved performance of STR profiling of bleach-damaged DNA. However, the repair assay did not improve DNA profiles from environmentally damaged bloodstains or bone, and in some cases resulted in lower RFU values for STR alleles. The extensive spectrum of DNA damage and myriad combinations of lesions that can be present in forensic samples appears to pose a challenge for the in vitro PreCRTM assay. The data suggest that the use of PreCR in casework should be considered with caution due to the assay’s varied results.",
keywords = "DNA damage, DNA repair, Human skeletal remains, PreCR™ Repair Mix",
author = "Angie Ambers and Meredith Turnbough and Robert Benjamin and Jonathan King and Bruce Budowle",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00414-014-1003-3",
language = "English",
volume = "128",
pages = "913--921",
journal = "International Journal of Legal Medicine",
issn = "0937-9827",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

Assessment of the role of DNA repair in damaged forensic samples. / Ambers, Angie; Turnbough, Meredith; Benjamin, Robert; King, Jonathan; Budowle, Bruce.

In: International journal of legal medicine, Vol. 128, No. 6, 01.01.2014, p. 913-921.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of the role of DNA repair in damaged forensic samples

AU - Ambers, Angie

AU - Turnbough, Meredith

AU - Benjamin, Robert

AU - King, Jonathan

AU - Budowle, Bruce

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Previous studies on DNA damage and repair have involved in vitro laboratory procedures that induce a single type of lesion in naked templates. Although repair of singular, sequestered types of DNA damage has shown some success, forensic and ancient specimens likely contain a number of different types of lesions. This study sought to (1) develop protocols to damage DNA in its native state, (2) generate a pool of candidate samples for repair that more likely emulate authentic forensic samples, and (3) assess the ability of the PreCRTM Repair Mix to repair the resultant lesions. Complexed, native DNA is more difficult to damage than naked DNA. Modified procedures included the use of higher concentrations and longer exposure times. Three types of samples, those that demonstrated damage based on short tandem repeat (STR) profile signals, were selected for repair experiments: environmentally damaged bloodstains, bleach-damaged whole blood, and human skeletal remains. Results showed trends of improved performance of STR profiling of bleach-damaged DNA. However, the repair assay did not improve DNA profiles from environmentally damaged bloodstains or bone, and in some cases resulted in lower RFU values for STR alleles. The extensive spectrum of DNA damage and myriad combinations of lesions that can be present in forensic samples appears to pose a challenge for the in vitro PreCRTM assay. The data suggest that the use of PreCR in casework should be considered with caution due to the assay’s varied results.

AB - Previous studies on DNA damage and repair have involved in vitro laboratory procedures that induce a single type of lesion in naked templates. Although repair of singular, sequestered types of DNA damage has shown some success, forensic and ancient specimens likely contain a number of different types of lesions. This study sought to (1) develop protocols to damage DNA in its native state, (2) generate a pool of candidate samples for repair that more likely emulate authentic forensic samples, and (3) assess the ability of the PreCRTM Repair Mix to repair the resultant lesions. Complexed, native DNA is more difficult to damage than naked DNA. Modified procedures included the use of higher concentrations and longer exposure times. Three types of samples, those that demonstrated damage based on short tandem repeat (STR) profile signals, were selected for repair experiments: environmentally damaged bloodstains, bleach-damaged whole blood, and human skeletal remains. Results showed trends of improved performance of STR profiling of bleach-damaged DNA. However, the repair assay did not improve DNA profiles from environmentally damaged bloodstains or bone, and in some cases resulted in lower RFU values for STR alleles. The extensive spectrum of DNA damage and myriad combinations of lesions that can be present in forensic samples appears to pose a challenge for the in vitro PreCRTM assay. The data suggest that the use of PreCR in casework should be considered with caution due to the assay’s varied results.

KW - DNA damage

KW - DNA repair

KW - Human skeletal remains

KW - PreCR™ Repair Mix

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934267774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00414-014-1003-3

DO - 10.1007/s00414-014-1003-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 24792635

AN - SCOPUS:84934267774

VL - 128

SP - 913

EP - 921

JO - International Journal of Legal Medicine

JF - International Journal of Legal Medicine

SN - 0937-9827

IS - 6

ER -