An alternative explanation for the apparent elevated relative mortality and morbidity risks associated with exposure to environmental tobacco smoke

T. D. Sterling, A. Glicksman, H. Perry, David Sterling, W. L. Rosenbaum, J. J. Weinkam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Insofar as industrial and other blue collar workers are more likely to bring home toxic materials on their person, and also are more likely to smoke than those in other occupations, members of a household are more likely to be subject to paraoccupational exposure and belong to lower socioeconomic strata if the household contains a smoker than if the household does not contain a smoker. Thus observed differences in risk of mortality or morbidity ascribed to ETS on the basis of a comparison of households with and without smokers may be partly or entirely due to differences in paraoccupational exposure and socioeconomic strata. Similarly, differences in mortality and morbidity ascribed to paraoccupational exposure may be partly or en tirely due to differences in ETS exposure that are also related to social class and to types of occupation. Unfortunately, there are no data now in existence that could help determine separately the effects of these major confounded variables. There exists, then, a situation in which two explanations are advanced for respiratory diseases among members of a household, each based on similar study populations but focused on different major risk variables: ETS on the one hand, socioeconomic status and paraoccupational exposure on the other. Properly focused investigations need to be initiated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)803-808
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume49
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 1996

Fingerprint

Environmental Exposure
Smoke
Tobacco
Morbidity
Mortality
Occupations
Social Class
Poisons
Population

Cite this

@article{af6e1676a95c4548bf3367509e10749c,
title = "An alternative explanation for the apparent elevated relative mortality and morbidity risks associated with exposure to environmental tobacco smoke",
abstract = "Insofar as industrial and other blue collar workers are more likely to bring home toxic materials on their person, and also are more likely to smoke than those in other occupations, members of a household are more likely to be subject to paraoccupational exposure and belong to lower socioeconomic strata if the household contains a smoker than if the household does not contain a smoker. Thus observed differences in risk of mortality or morbidity ascribed to ETS on the basis of a comparison of households with and without smokers may be partly or entirely due to differences in paraoccupational exposure and socioeconomic strata. Similarly, differences in mortality and morbidity ascribed to paraoccupational exposure may be partly or en tirely due to differences in ETS exposure that are also related to social class and to types of occupation. Unfortunately, there are no data now in existence that could help determine separately the effects of these major confounded variables. There exists, then, a situation in which two explanations are advanced for respiratory diseases among members of a household, each based on similar study populations but focused on different major risk variables: ETS on the one hand, socioeconomic status and paraoccupational exposure on the other. Properly focused investigations need to be initiated.",
author = "Sterling, {T. D.} and A. Glicksman and H. Perry and David Sterling and Rosenbaum, {W. L.} and Weinkam, {J. J.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0895-4356(96)00032-7",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "803--808",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "7",

}

An alternative explanation for the apparent elevated relative mortality and morbidity risks associated with exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. / Sterling, T. D.; Glicksman, A.; Perry, H.; Sterling, David; Rosenbaum, W. L.; Weinkam, J. J.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 49, No. 7, 01.01.1996, p. 803-808.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An alternative explanation for the apparent elevated relative mortality and morbidity risks associated with exposure to environmental tobacco smoke

AU - Sterling, T. D.

AU - Glicksman, A.

AU - Perry, H.

AU - Sterling, David

AU - Rosenbaum, W. L.

AU - Weinkam, J. J.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Insofar as industrial and other blue collar workers are more likely to bring home toxic materials on their person, and also are more likely to smoke than those in other occupations, members of a household are more likely to be subject to paraoccupational exposure and belong to lower socioeconomic strata if the household contains a smoker than if the household does not contain a smoker. Thus observed differences in risk of mortality or morbidity ascribed to ETS on the basis of a comparison of households with and without smokers may be partly or entirely due to differences in paraoccupational exposure and socioeconomic strata. Similarly, differences in mortality and morbidity ascribed to paraoccupational exposure may be partly or en tirely due to differences in ETS exposure that are also related to social class and to types of occupation. Unfortunately, there are no data now in existence that could help determine separately the effects of these major confounded variables. There exists, then, a situation in which two explanations are advanced for respiratory diseases among members of a household, each based on similar study populations but focused on different major risk variables: ETS on the one hand, socioeconomic status and paraoccupational exposure on the other. Properly focused investigations need to be initiated.

AB - Insofar as industrial and other blue collar workers are more likely to bring home toxic materials on their person, and also are more likely to smoke than those in other occupations, members of a household are more likely to be subject to paraoccupational exposure and belong to lower socioeconomic strata if the household contains a smoker than if the household does not contain a smoker. Thus observed differences in risk of mortality or morbidity ascribed to ETS on the basis of a comparison of households with and without smokers may be partly or entirely due to differences in paraoccupational exposure and socioeconomic strata. Similarly, differences in mortality and morbidity ascribed to paraoccupational exposure may be partly or en tirely due to differences in ETS exposure that are also related to social class and to types of occupation. Unfortunately, there are no data now in existence that could help determine separately the effects of these major confounded variables. There exists, then, a situation in which two explanations are advanced for respiratory diseases among members of a household, each based on similar study populations but focused on different major risk variables: ETS on the one hand, socioeconomic status and paraoccupational exposure on the other. Properly focused investigations need to be initiated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030198312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00032-7

DO - 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00032-7

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 803

EP - 808

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 7

ER -