TY - JOUR
T1 - An Adoption Study of Human Obesity
AU - Stunkard, Albert J.
AU - Sørensen, Thorkild I.a.
AU - Hanis, Craig
AU - Teasdale, Thomas W.
AU - Chakraborty, Ranajit
AU - Schull, William J.
AU - Schulsinger, Fini
PY - 1986/1/23
Y1 - 1986/1/23
N2 - We examined the contributions of genetic factors and the family environment to human fatness in a sample of 540 adult Danish adoptees who were selected from a population of 3580 and divided into four weight classes: thin, median weight, overweight, and obese. There was a strong relation between the weight class of the adoptees and the body-mass index of their biologic parents — for the mothers, P<0.0001; for the fathers, P<0.02. There was no relation between the weight class of the adoptees and the body-mass index of their adoptive parents. Cumulative distributions of the body-mass index of parents showed similar results; there was a strong relation between the body-mass index of biologic parents and adoptee weight class and no relation between the index of adoptive parents and adoptee weight class. Furthermore, the relation between biologic parents and adoptees was not confined to the obesity weight class, but was present across the whole range of body fatness — from very thin to very fat. We conclude that genetic influences have an important role in determining human fatness in adults, whereas the family environment alone has no apparent effect. (N Engl J Med 1986; 314:193–8.), Recent studies of twins suggest that human obesity and fatness are highly heritable.1 2 3 4 5 This suggestion would be greatly strengthened if it were confirmed by adoption studies, another method of assessing genetic influence in humans. Unfortunately, only four studies6 7 8 9 have used this method, and all were handicapped by the lack of information on biologic parents and by the failure to explore the entire range of body weight. Three were further limited by being confined to children. Moreover, the results of these studies are in serious disagreement. Hartz et al. reported that family environment was far more important than heredity in determining.
AB - We examined the contributions of genetic factors and the family environment to human fatness in a sample of 540 adult Danish adoptees who were selected from a population of 3580 and divided into four weight classes: thin, median weight, overweight, and obese. There was a strong relation between the weight class of the adoptees and the body-mass index of their biologic parents — for the mothers, P<0.0001; for the fathers, P<0.02. There was no relation between the weight class of the adoptees and the body-mass index of their adoptive parents. Cumulative distributions of the body-mass index of parents showed similar results; there was a strong relation between the body-mass index of biologic parents and adoptee weight class and no relation between the index of adoptive parents and adoptee weight class. Furthermore, the relation between biologic parents and adoptees was not confined to the obesity weight class, but was present across the whole range of body fatness — from very thin to very fat. We conclude that genetic influences have an important role in determining human fatness in adults, whereas the family environment alone has no apparent effect. (N Engl J Med 1986; 314:193–8.), Recent studies of twins suggest that human obesity and fatness are highly heritable.1 2 3 4 5 This suggestion would be greatly strengthened if it were confirmed by adoption studies, another method of assessing genetic influence in humans. Unfortunately, only four studies6 7 8 9 have used this method, and all were handicapped by the lack of information on biologic parents and by the failure to explore the entire range of body weight. Three were further limited by being confined to children. Moreover, the results of these studies are in serious disagreement. Hartz et al. reported that family environment was far more important than heredity in determining.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022657870&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJM198601233140401
DO - 10.1056/NEJM198601233140401
M3 - Article
C2 - 3941707
AN - SCOPUS:0022657870
VL - 314
SP - 193
EP - 198
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
SN - 0028-4793
IS - 4
ER -