A Prospective Two-Year Study of Functional Restoration in Industrial Low Back Injury: An Objective Assessment Procedure

Tom G. Mayer, Robert J. Gatchel, Holly Mayer, Nancy D. Kishino, Janice Keeley, Vert Mooney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

462 Scopus citations

Abstract

One hundred sixteen consecutive patients entered a functional restoration treatment program for chronic low back pain and were compared with 72 patients not treated. A two-year follow-up survey reached more than 85% of both groups; its findings were compared with earlier results of a five-month and one-year follow-up. Analysis demonstrated that 87% of the treatment group was actively working after two years, as compared with only 41% of the nontreatment comparison group. Moreover, about twice as many of the comparison group patients had additional spine surgery relative to the treatment group. The comparison group continued with an approximately five times higher rate of patient visits to health professionals in the second year as the treatment group. Also, treatment group reinjury rates were no higher than those expected in the general population, while nontreatment subjects had a higher incidence of reinjury. Finally, a small treatment “dropout” group did poorest of all, with results in almost all areas even worse than those of the comparison group patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1763-1767
Number of pages5
JournalJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume258
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Oct 1987

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Prospective Two-Year Study of Functional Restoration in Industrial Low Back Injury: An Objective Assessment Procedure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this