A multisite randomized trial of normative feedback for heavy drinking

Social comparison versus social comparison plus correction of normative misperceptions

Clayton Neighbors, Melissa Ardelle Lewis, Joseph LaBrie, Angelo M. DiBello, Chelsie M. Young, Dipali V. Rinker, Dana Michelle Litt, Lindsey M. Rodriguez, C. Raymond Knee, Ezekiel Hamor, Jessica M. Jerabeck, Mary E. Larimer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Given widespread alcohol misuse among college students, numerous intervention programs have been developed, including personalized normative feedback (PNF). Most research evaluating PNF assumes that presenting one's own perceived norms is necessary to correct normative misperceptions and thereby reduce drinking. Alternatively, simply providing social comparison information showing that one drinks more than others may be sufficient. The present study evaluated the efficacy of full PNF (one's own drinking, campus drinking rates, and perceived norms) and a partial personalized social comparison feedback (PSCF; one's own drinking and campus drinking rates) in a randomized trial among heavy-drinking college students. Method: Participants included 623 heavy-drinking students from 3 universities. Assessments occurred at baseline and 3- and 6-months postbaseline. Results: Primary analyses examined differences across 4 drinking outcomes (drinks per week, total drinks past month, frequency of past month drinking, and negative alcohol-related consequences) at 3- and 6-month follow-ups controlling for the baseline variable. Results revealed significant reductions across all alcohol consumption outcomes at 3 months in both intervention conditions compared to attention-control. Mediation analyses demonstrated significant indirect effects of the intervention on 6-month drinking through changes in perceived norms at 3 months. Moreover, evidence emerged for changes in drinking at 3 months as a mediator of the association between PSCF and 6-month perceived norms. Conclusions: The present research suggests PNF may not require explicit consideration of one's perceived norms to be effective and that direct social comparison provides an alternative theoretical mechanism for PNF efficacy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238-247
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Volume84
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Drinking
Alcohol Drinking
Research
Alcohols
Students

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • College
  • Personalized normative feedback
  • Social norms

Cite this

Neighbors, Clayton ; Lewis, Melissa Ardelle ; LaBrie, Joseph ; DiBello, Angelo M. ; Young, Chelsie M. ; Rinker, Dipali V. ; Litt, Dana Michelle ; Rodriguez, Lindsey M. ; Knee, C. Raymond ; Hamor, Ezekiel ; Jerabeck, Jessica M. ; Larimer, Mary E. / A multisite randomized trial of normative feedback for heavy drinking : Social comparison versus social comparison plus correction of normative misperceptions. In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 84, No. 3. pp. 238-247.
@article{a370d02a391442649679dfa50db1ee86,
title = "A multisite randomized trial of normative feedback for heavy drinking: Social comparison versus social comparison plus correction of normative misperceptions",
abstract = "Objective: Given widespread alcohol misuse among college students, numerous intervention programs have been developed, including personalized normative feedback (PNF). Most research evaluating PNF assumes that presenting one's own perceived norms is necessary to correct normative misperceptions and thereby reduce drinking. Alternatively, simply providing social comparison information showing that one drinks more than others may be sufficient. The present study evaluated the efficacy of full PNF (one's own drinking, campus drinking rates, and perceived norms) and a partial personalized social comparison feedback (PSCF; one's own drinking and campus drinking rates) in a randomized trial among heavy-drinking college students. Method: Participants included 623 heavy-drinking students from 3 universities. Assessments occurred at baseline and 3- and 6-months postbaseline. Results: Primary analyses examined differences across 4 drinking outcomes (drinks per week, total drinks past month, frequency of past month drinking, and negative alcohol-related consequences) at 3- and 6-month follow-ups controlling for the baseline variable. Results revealed significant reductions across all alcohol consumption outcomes at 3 months in both intervention conditions compared to attention-control. Mediation analyses demonstrated significant indirect effects of the intervention on 6-month drinking through changes in perceived norms at 3 months. Moreover, evidence emerged for changes in drinking at 3 months as a mediator of the association between PSCF and 6-month perceived norms. Conclusions: The present research suggests PNF may not require explicit consideration of one's perceived norms to be effective and that direct social comparison provides an alternative theoretical mechanism for PNF efficacy.",
keywords = "Alcohol, College, Personalized normative feedback, Social norms",
author = "Clayton Neighbors and Lewis, {Melissa Ardelle} and Joseph LaBrie and DiBello, {Angelo M.} and Young, {Chelsie M.} and Rinker, {Dipali V.} and Litt, {Dana Michelle} and Rodriguez, {Lindsey M.} and Knee, {C. Raymond} and Ezekiel Hamor and Jerabeck, {Jessica M.} and Larimer, {Mary E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/ccp0000067",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "238--247",
journal = "Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0022-006X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

A multisite randomized trial of normative feedback for heavy drinking : Social comparison versus social comparison plus correction of normative misperceptions. / Neighbors, Clayton; Lewis, Melissa Ardelle; LaBrie, Joseph; DiBello, Angelo M.; Young, Chelsie M.; Rinker, Dipali V.; Litt, Dana Michelle; Rodriguez, Lindsey M.; Knee, C. Raymond; Hamor, Ezekiel; Jerabeck, Jessica M.; Larimer, Mary E.

In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 84, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 238-247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multisite randomized trial of normative feedback for heavy drinking

T2 - Social comparison versus social comparison plus correction of normative misperceptions

AU - Neighbors, Clayton

AU - Lewis, Melissa Ardelle

AU - LaBrie, Joseph

AU - DiBello, Angelo M.

AU - Young, Chelsie M.

AU - Rinker, Dipali V.

AU - Litt, Dana Michelle

AU - Rodriguez, Lindsey M.

AU - Knee, C. Raymond

AU - Hamor, Ezekiel

AU - Jerabeck, Jessica M.

AU - Larimer, Mary E.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Objective: Given widespread alcohol misuse among college students, numerous intervention programs have been developed, including personalized normative feedback (PNF). Most research evaluating PNF assumes that presenting one's own perceived norms is necessary to correct normative misperceptions and thereby reduce drinking. Alternatively, simply providing social comparison information showing that one drinks more than others may be sufficient. The present study evaluated the efficacy of full PNF (one's own drinking, campus drinking rates, and perceived norms) and a partial personalized social comparison feedback (PSCF; one's own drinking and campus drinking rates) in a randomized trial among heavy-drinking college students. Method: Participants included 623 heavy-drinking students from 3 universities. Assessments occurred at baseline and 3- and 6-months postbaseline. Results: Primary analyses examined differences across 4 drinking outcomes (drinks per week, total drinks past month, frequency of past month drinking, and negative alcohol-related consequences) at 3- and 6-month follow-ups controlling for the baseline variable. Results revealed significant reductions across all alcohol consumption outcomes at 3 months in both intervention conditions compared to attention-control. Mediation analyses demonstrated significant indirect effects of the intervention on 6-month drinking through changes in perceived norms at 3 months. Moreover, evidence emerged for changes in drinking at 3 months as a mediator of the association between PSCF and 6-month perceived norms. Conclusions: The present research suggests PNF may not require explicit consideration of one's perceived norms to be effective and that direct social comparison provides an alternative theoretical mechanism for PNF efficacy.

AB - Objective: Given widespread alcohol misuse among college students, numerous intervention programs have been developed, including personalized normative feedback (PNF). Most research evaluating PNF assumes that presenting one's own perceived norms is necessary to correct normative misperceptions and thereby reduce drinking. Alternatively, simply providing social comparison information showing that one drinks more than others may be sufficient. The present study evaluated the efficacy of full PNF (one's own drinking, campus drinking rates, and perceived norms) and a partial personalized social comparison feedback (PSCF; one's own drinking and campus drinking rates) in a randomized trial among heavy-drinking college students. Method: Participants included 623 heavy-drinking students from 3 universities. Assessments occurred at baseline and 3- and 6-months postbaseline. Results: Primary analyses examined differences across 4 drinking outcomes (drinks per week, total drinks past month, frequency of past month drinking, and negative alcohol-related consequences) at 3- and 6-month follow-ups controlling for the baseline variable. Results revealed significant reductions across all alcohol consumption outcomes at 3 months in both intervention conditions compared to attention-control. Mediation analyses demonstrated significant indirect effects of the intervention on 6-month drinking through changes in perceived norms at 3 months. Moreover, evidence emerged for changes in drinking at 3 months as a mediator of the association between PSCF and 6-month perceived norms. Conclusions: The present research suggests PNF may not require explicit consideration of one's perceived norms to be effective and that direct social comparison provides an alternative theoretical mechanism for PNF efficacy.

KW - Alcohol

KW - College

KW - Personalized normative feedback

KW - Social norms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84960350519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/ccp0000067

DO - 10.1037/ccp0000067

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 238

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

SN - 0022-006X

IS - 3

ER -