A Multiple‐Response Evaluation of EMG Biofeedback Performance During Training and Stress‐Induction Conditions

Robert Joseph Gatchel, Maurice Korman, Charles B. Weis, Dan Smith, Lewis Clarke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study evaluated multiple system physiological responding which accompanied EMG biofeedback performance under two conditions—during EMG biofeedback training sessions, and during the utilization of that training in the presence of a stressor. Twelve subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1) an EMG biofeedback group, or 2) a false‐EMG biofeedback group. During the training sessions, significant frontalis EMG decreases were produced by the biofeedback group. This performance was associated with a concomitant decrease in heart rate and respiration rate, but an increase in skin conductance level. The biofeedback group was also able to maintain a low level of EMG activity during a stress‐induction procedure. However, this low level of activity did not generalize to other physiological responses. Heart rate and skin conductance levels both increased, which coincided with the subjects' self‐report of anxiety during this phase of the study. These data clearly demonstrate that single‐system arousal reduction produced by EMG biofeedback training, rather than producing cross‐system arousal reduction, produces specificity of a single response change under a stress‐inducing situation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-258
Number of pages6
JournalPsychophysiology
Volume15
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 1978

Fingerprint

Arousal
Heart Rate
Skin
Respiratory Rate
Biofeedback (Psychology)
Anxiety

Keywords

  • EMG biofeedback
  • Multiple‐response evaluation
  • Stress‐induction

Cite this

Gatchel, Robert Joseph ; Korman, Maurice ; Weis, Charles B. ; Smith, Dan ; Clarke, Lewis. / A Multiple‐Response Evaluation of EMG Biofeedback Performance During Training and Stress‐Induction Conditions. In: Psychophysiology. 1978 ; Vol. 15, No. 3. pp. 253-258.
@article{1c07a6806a78401da365a48e5a55b783,
title = "A Multiple‐Response Evaluation of EMG Biofeedback Performance During Training and Stress‐Induction Conditions",
abstract = "The present study evaluated multiple system physiological responding which accompanied EMG biofeedback performance under two conditions—during EMG biofeedback training sessions, and during the utilization of that training in the presence of a stressor. Twelve subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1) an EMG biofeedback group, or 2) a false‐EMG biofeedback group. During the training sessions, significant frontalis EMG decreases were produced by the biofeedback group. This performance was associated with a concomitant decrease in heart rate and respiration rate, but an increase in skin conductance level. The biofeedback group was also able to maintain a low level of EMG activity during a stress‐induction procedure. However, this low level of activity did not generalize to other physiological responses. Heart rate and skin conductance levels both increased, which coincided with the subjects' self‐report of anxiety during this phase of the study. These data clearly demonstrate that single‐system arousal reduction produced by EMG biofeedback training, rather than producing cross‐system arousal reduction, produces specificity of a single response change under a stress‐inducing situation.",
keywords = "EMG biofeedback, Multiple‐response evaluation, Stress‐induction",
author = "Gatchel, {Robert Joseph} and Maurice Korman and Weis, {Charles B.} and Dan Smith and Lewis Clarke",
year = "1978",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01378.x",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "253--258",
journal = "Psychophysiology",
issn = "0048-5772",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "3",

}

A Multiple‐Response Evaluation of EMG Biofeedback Performance During Training and Stress‐Induction Conditions. / Gatchel, Robert Joseph; Korman, Maurice; Weis, Charles B.; Smith, Dan; Clarke, Lewis.

In: Psychophysiology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.01.1978, p. 253-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Multiple‐Response Evaluation of EMG Biofeedback Performance During Training and Stress‐Induction Conditions

AU - Gatchel, Robert Joseph

AU - Korman, Maurice

AU - Weis, Charles B.

AU - Smith, Dan

AU - Clarke, Lewis

PY - 1978/1/1

Y1 - 1978/1/1

N2 - The present study evaluated multiple system physiological responding which accompanied EMG biofeedback performance under two conditions—during EMG biofeedback training sessions, and during the utilization of that training in the presence of a stressor. Twelve subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1) an EMG biofeedback group, or 2) a false‐EMG biofeedback group. During the training sessions, significant frontalis EMG decreases were produced by the biofeedback group. This performance was associated with a concomitant decrease in heart rate and respiration rate, but an increase in skin conductance level. The biofeedback group was also able to maintain a low level of EMG activity during a stress‐induction procedure. However, this low level of activity did not generalize to other physiological responses. Heart rate and skin conductance levels both increased, which coincided with the subjects' self‐report of anxiety during this phase of the study. These data clearly demonstrate that single‐system arousal reduction produced by EMG biofeedback training, rather than producing cross‐system arousal reduction, produces specificity of a single response change under a stress‐inducing situation.

AB - The present study evaluated multiple system physiological responding which accompanied EMG biofeedback performance under two conditions—during EMG biofeedback training sessions, and during the utilization of that training in the presence of a stressor. Twelve subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1) an EMG biofeedback group, or 2) a false‐EMG biofeedback group. During the training sessions, significant frontalis EMG decreases were produced by the biofeedback group. This performance was associated with a concomitant decrease in heart rate and respiration rate, but an increase in skin conductance level. The biofeedback group was also able to maintain a low level of EMG activity during a stress‐induction procedure. However, this low level of activity did not generalize to other physiological responses. Heart rate and skin conductance levels both increased, which coincided with the subjects' self‐report of anxiety during this phase of the study. These data clearly demonstrate that single‐system arousal reduction produced by EMG biofeedback training, rather than producing cross‐system arousal reduction, produces specificity of a single response change under a stress‐inducing situation.

KW - EMG biofeedback

KW - Multiple‐response evaluation

KW - Stress‐induction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018102586&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01378.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1978.tb01378.x

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 253

EP - 258

JO - Psychophysiology

JF - Psychophysiology

SN - 0048-5772

IS - 3

ER -