Abstract
Forensic genetic laboratories are challenged with implementing innovation even if the benefits to operational performance are well demonstrated often because of internal budget constraints. A prospective cost–benefit analysis (CBA) could support justification for an increased budget by effectively demonstrating in a system-based approach the relatively small cost of increasing a laboratory budget can substantially reduce costs to society (both qualitatively and monetarily). A Monte Carlo simulation and sensitivity CBA was performed using a more expensive swab (i.e., nylon 4N6FLOQSwabs®) compared with a less costly cotton swab. Ranges of input values and tangible and intangible benefits were considered. The outcome is that the relatively small increased cost of using a nylon swab pales compared with the potential tangible and intangible benefits to the overall system. This approach provides a sounder basis for requesting additional funds to support implementation of technologies and better approximates realistic situations while accommodating uncertainty of input values.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 56-58 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series |
Volume | 8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2022 |
Keywords
- 4N6FLOQSwabs®
- Cost-benefit analysis
- DNA profile uploads
- National DNA database
- Sexual assault
- Tangible and intangible costs
- Victim