2019 united states osteopathic medical regulatory summit: Consensus, recommendations, and next steps in defining osteopathic distinctiveness

John R. Gimpel, Susan I. Belanger, Janice A. Knebl, Richard J. Labaere, Dana C. Shaffer, Stephen C. Shannon, Toni Shears, Scott A. Steingard, Melissa D. Turner, Daniel G. Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Osteopathic distinctiveness is a result of professional education, identity formation, training, credentialing, and qualifications. With the advancement of a single graduate medical education (GME) accreditation system and the continued growth of the osteopathic medical profession, osteopathic distinctiveness and professional identity are seen as lacking clarity and pose a challenge. Summit: To achieve consensus on a succinct definition of osteopathic distinctiveness and to identify steps to more clearly define and advance that distinctiveness, particularly in professional self-regulation, a representative group of osteopathic medical students, residents, physicians, and members of the licensing, GME, and undergraduate medical education (UME) communities convened the 2019 United States Osteopathic Medical Regulatory Summit in February 2019. Key features of osteopathic distinctiveness were discussed. Growth in the profession; changes in health care delivery, technology, and demographics within the profession and patient communities; and associated challenges and opportunities for osteopathic medical practice and patients were considered. Consensus: Osteopathic medicine is a distinctive practice that brings unique, added value to patients, the public, and the health care community at large. A universal definition and common understanding of that distinctiveness is lacking. Efforts to unify messaging that defines osteopathic distinctiveness, to align the distinctive elements of osteopathic medical education and professional self-regulation across a continuum, and to advance research on care and educational program outcomes are critical to the future of the osteopathic medical profession. Recommendations: (1) Convene a task force of groups represented at the Summit to develop a succinct and consistent message defining osteopathic distinctiveness. (2) Demonstrate uniqueness of the profession through research demonstrating efficacy of care and patient outcomes, adding to the public good. (3) Harmonize GME and UME by beginning to align entrustable professional activities with UME milestones. (4) Convene representatives from osteopathic specialty colleges and certification boards to define curricular elements across GME, certification, and osteopathic continuous certification. (5) Build on the Project in Osteopathic Medical Education and Empathy study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-44
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Osteopathic Association
Volume120
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2020

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Osteopathic distinctiveness

Cite this

Gimpel, J. R., Belanger, S. I., Knebl, J. A., Labaere, R. J., Shaffer, D. C., Shannon, S. C., Shears, T., Steingard, S. A., Turner, M. D., & Williams, D. G. (2020). 2019 united states osteopathic medical regulatory summit: Consensus, recommendations, and next steps in defining osteopathic distinctiveness. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 120(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2020.005